In:New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 17–76
Finiteness, opacity, and Chinese clausal architecture
Published online: 13 April 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.02hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.02hua
Abstract
Although languages differ considerably in the way they encode finiteness syntactically or morphonology, the
‘finiteness distinction’ exists as a universal grammatical phenomenon. This chapter will re-affirm the claim that the distinction
exists in Chinese, with robust clustered properties that diagnose the different clause types on several scales, with respect to
temporal (in)dependence, clausal opacity/transparency, inter-clausal integration, etc. I address how finiteness is encoded,
considering the hypothesis that finiteness is related to surface clause sizes (e.g., CP, IP, vP). As for the origin of the clause size
differences it is suggested that they arise from the fundamental (in)ability of a clause to make deictic temporal reference. Under a
pronominal theory of tense semantics, the nature of a syntactic T0 (being an anaphor, a pronominal or an r-expression)
determines its binding properties as well as its possible clause size, with ensuing signature properties that mark the finiteness
distinction.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Finiteness distinctions in Chinese and properties that diagnose
them
- 2.1Scale of independence
- 2.2Scale of opacity
- A.Aspect lowering
- B.Before-collocation
- C.Internal topicalization
- D.Verb copying
- E.Focus fronting
- F.Clitic climbing of suo
- G.Long distance passivization
- H.Scope skipping of you ‘again’
- 2.3Scale of integration
- 3.Finiteness and clausal architecture
- 3.1Finiteness as clause size
- 3.2On C-selection and clause-size reduction
- 4.Finiteness and syntactic coding
- 4.1Finiteness in nominal complementation
- 4.2Finiteness beyond complement types
- 4.3Finiteness and syntactic encoding
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (132)
Abusch, Dorit. 1988. Sequence of tense, intensionality and
scope. WCCFL 7:1–14. CSLI, Stanford University.
Amritavalli, R. 2014. Separating tense and finiteness: anchoring in
Dravidian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32:283–306.
Bartos, Huba. 2019. The V-copy construction in Mandarin: A case
temporarily reopened. In Interfaces in Grammar, Jianhua Hu and Haihua Pan (eds), 167–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric
anchoring. In Temps et Point de Vue [tense and point
of view], Jacqueline Gueron and L. Tasmovski (eds), 213–246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric Agr. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth Safir (eds), 69–110. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cheng, Lisa. 2007. Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In The Copy Theory of Movement, Jairo Nunes & Norbert Corver (eds), 151–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds), 1–31. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chiu, Bonnie. 1993. The Inflectional Structure of Mandarin
Chinese. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
. 1995. An object clitic projection in Mandarin
Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4:77–117.
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal
Syntax, Peter Culicover, A. Akmajian, and T. Wasow (eds), 71–133. New York: Academic Press.
Chomksy, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its nature, Origins and
Use. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: a Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Costa, João. 2004. Subjects in Spec,vP: locality and
agree. In Romance Op. 47, A. Castro, M. Ferreira, V. Hacquard and A. Pablo Salanova (eds), 1–15. MITWPL.
Ernst, Thomas, and Chengchi Wang. 1995. Object preposing in Mandarin
Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4:235–260.
Fu, Jingqi. 1994. SOV word order in Chinese and IP
specifier. Paper presented at the NACCL-6 conference, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Givon, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of
complements. Studies in Language 4:333–377.
. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gouguet, Jules. 2006. Adverbials in Mandarin argument
structure. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds), 155–173.
Grano, Thomas. 2012. Control and Restructuring at the Syntax-Semantics
Interface. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
. 2014. Control without finiteness contrasts: Aspect and
complement size in Mandarin Chinese. Ms., Indiana University.
. 2017. Finiteness contrasts without Tense? A view from
Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26: 259–299.
Gu, Yang. 2008. Shitai, shizhi lilun yu Hanyu shijian canzhao
yanjiu [Studies of tense, aspect and Chinese time
reference], in Dangdai yuyanxue lilun he Hanyu yanjiu [Contemporary
linguistic theories and Chinese language research], Yang Shen and Shengli Feng (eds), 97–119. Beijing: Commercial Press.
He, Yuyin. 2020. Time in Mandarin: the Fingerprints of Tense and
Finiteness. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Henry, Alison. 1992. Infinitives in a for-to
dialect. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10: 279–301.
. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation
and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan & Liejiong Xu. 2001. Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in
Chinese? Linguistics 39:1117–1148.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982 [1998]. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of
Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT. [Published under the same title by Garland Publishers,
1998.]
. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control
theory. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo A. Jaeggli and Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative
perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29:423–509.
. 2016. The syntax and semantics of pre-nominals:
construction or composition? Language and Linguistics 17:431–475.
. 2017. On finiteness and the architecture of complements
in verbal and nominal domains. Paper presented at the 11th Workshop on Theoretical East
Asian Linguistics (TEAL-11), Academia Sinica.
. 2018. Argument structure, lexical decomposition, and
light verb syntax. Studies in Prosodic Syntax 2:1–31.
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Yafei Li. 2000. Relativization: order and
structure. Paper presented at IACL-9, Singapore National University.
Huang, C.-T. James and C.-S. Luther Liu. 2001. Logophoricity, attitudes and
ziji at the interface. In Long distance reflexives, Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & James Huang (eds), 141–195. New York: Academic Press.
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, Hsin-Lun. 2018. The Head-Quarters of Mandarin
Arguments. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
. 2018. Control complements in Mandarin Chinese:
implications for restructuring and the Chinese finiteness
debate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27:347–376.
Huang, X.-Y. Kevin. 2009. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese:
A view from cartography and MP. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
Huang, Yan. 1994. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: a Study with
Special Reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1992. Review of: Li, Audrey Yen-hui. 1990. Order and
constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Journal of Linguistics 28. 251–256.
Kaplan, Aidan, Eliza Scruton & Jim Wood. 2017. For-to infinitives. Yale
Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North
America. (Available online at [URL].)
Klein, Wolfgang, Ping Li & Hemriette Hendriks. 2000. Aspect and assertion in Mandarin
Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18: 723–770.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2007. Verbal and nominalized finite clauses in
Turkish. In Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical
foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed), 305–332. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and
tenses. SALT Proceedings 8:92–110.
Lai, Yan Ki Jackie. 2021. The Nature of the Postverbal Field in Mandarin
Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1985. Abstract Case in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
. 2017. Comments on the papers on
finiteness. Presented at the 11th Workshop on Theoretical
East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-11), Academia
Sinica.
Liao, W.-W. Roger and Y.-Y. Iris Wang. 2021. Attitude, control and finiteness distinction in
Chinese. Ms., Academia Sinica and Ming Chuan University.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2003. Temporal reference in Mandarin
Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12:259–311.
. 2010. A tenseless analysis of Mandarin Chinese
revisited: A response to Sybesma 2007. Linguistic Inquiry 41:305–329.
. 2012. Tenselessness. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed), 669–695. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in
Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14:48–73.
. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese
and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48:151–186.
. 2013. QR and finiteness. In Deep Insights, Broad Perspectives: Essays in Honor of
Mamoru Saito, Y. Miyamoto, D. Takahashi, H. Maki, M. Ochi, K. Sugisaki & A. Uchibori (eds), 275–291. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Liu, Na and C.-T. James Huang. 2016. Control and raising passives, and why Mandarin
does not smuggle. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25:385–404.
Liu, Yuyang. 2020. ‘Again’ skipping in Mandarin
Chinese. Ms. Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
McFadden, Thomas and Sandhya Sundaresan. 2014. Finiteness in South Asian Languages: An
Introduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32:1–27.
Müller, Gereon. 2020. Rethinking restructuring. In Syntactic architecture and its consequences II: Between
syntax and morphology, András Bárány, Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas & Sten Vikner (eds), 149–190. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2007. Introduction. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1989. Temporal Reference in Japanese and
English. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Ogihara. Toshiyuki. 1995. Double-access sentences and reference to
states. Natural Language Semantics 3:177–210.
Paul, Waltraud. 2002. Sentence-internal topics in Mandarin Chinese: The
case of object preposing. Language and Linguistics 3:695–714.
. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin
Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 33:111–133.
. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final
particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68:77–115.
Paul, Waltraud & Victor Pan. 2017. What you see is what you get: Chinese
sentence-final particles as head-final
complementisers. In Discourse particles: Formal approaches to their syntax
and semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 49–77. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pesestsky, David. 2017–2021. Exfoliation: Towards a derivational theory of
clause size. Ms., MIT., available at Lingbuzz.
Qu, Yanfeng. 1994. Object Noun Phrase Dislocation in Mandarin
Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Raposo, Eduardo. 1987. Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: the inflected
infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 85–109.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left
periphery. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rochette, Anne. 1988. Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Romance
Sentential Complementation. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
. 1990. On the restructuring classes of verbs in
Romance. In Binding in Romance: Essays in honour of Judith
McA′Nulty, Anna Maria Di Sciullo and Anne Rochette (eds), 96–128. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Linguistic Association.
Satik, Deniz. 2021. The maximal size of infinitives: a truncation
theory of finiteness. Ms. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University. Available at Lingbuzz.
Sells, Peter. 2007. Finiteness in non-transformational syntactic
frameworks. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed), 59–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shen, Li. 2004. Aspect agreement and light verbs in Chinese: A
comparison with Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13:141–179.
Shlonsky, Ur. 1988. Complementizer-cliticization in Hebrew and the
Empty Category Principle. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6:191–205.
Shyu, Shu-Ing. 1995. The Syntax of Focus and Topic in Mandarin
Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Sun, Hongyuan. 2014. Temporal Construals of Bare Predicates in
Mandarin Chinese. PhD dissertation, Universities of Leiden and Nantes, available at: [URL]
. 2017a. Finiteness. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and
Linguistics, Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds), Leiden: Brill, Vol II, 233–237. Online at [URL].
. 2017b. Tense. Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and
Linguistics, Brill. Online at [URL].
. 2019. Xiandingxing he hanyu zhuju ‘[Finiteness and
Chinese main clauses]’. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:325–344.
Sybesma, Rint and Boya Li. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of
Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117:1739–1783.
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended
X’-Theory. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1977. Guoyu bianxing yufa diyiji: yiwei
bianxing. [Chinese transformational grammar,
V1: movement transformations.] Taipei: Student book Co.
Ting, Jen. 1998. Deriving the bei construction in
Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7:319–354.
. 2010. On the climbing of the particle
suo in Mandarin Chinese and its
implications for the theory of clitic
placement. The Linguistic Review 27:449–483.
. 2019. Hanyu de yuqi xianzhuxing he yinxing motai
fanchou [Mood prominence in Chinese and covert
modalities]. Yuyankexue 18 (1):1–12.
Ussery, Cherlon, Lydia Ding & Yining Rebecca Liu. 2016. The typology of Mandarin
infinitives. Processings of Linguistic Society of America, Vol 1, Article 28:1–15.
Wei, Wei Haley and H.-Y. Audrey Li. 2018. Adverbial clauses in Mandarin
Chinese. Linguistic Analysis 42:163–330.
Wurmbrand, Susi, and Maddalena Lohninger. 2020. An implicational universal in complementation:
theoretical insights and empirical progress. Ms., to appear in Propositionale Argumente im
Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie
[Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research:
Theoretical and Empirical Issues], Jutta M. Hartmann & Angelika Wöllstein (eds). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Wurmbrand, Susi, Iva Kovač, Magdalena Lohninger, Caroline Pajančič, and Neda Todorović. 2020. Finiteness in south Slavic complement clauses:
Evidence for an implicational finiteness
universal. Linguistica 60:119–137.
Xu, Liejong. 2003. Choice between the overt and the
covert. Transactions of the Philological Society 101:81–107.
Xu, Ting. 2011. You again: How is its ambiguity
derived? In Logic, language and meaning, Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit Weidman Sassoon, Katrin Schulz, and Matthijs Westera (eds), 470–480. Berlin: Springer.
. 2016. Almost again: On the Semantics and Acquisition of
Decomposition Adverbs. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Xue, Ping and Paul McFetridge. 1996. Complement structure in Chinese. CLS Proceedings 32. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Xue, Ping, and Paul McFetridge. 1998. Verb complementation, null pronominals and
binding. WCCFL Proceedings 17: 479–493.
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2008. Gapless relative clauses as clausal licensers of
relational nouns. Language and Linguistics 9:1005–1028.
. 2016. Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the
forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25:275–311.
. 2019. Sentence-final aspect particles as finite markers
in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 57:967–1023.
Zhao, Chen and Alain Rouveret. 2019. Chinese objects and the labeling of symmetric
structures. Ms., Université de Paris and Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Chen, Fulang
Lam, Chit‐Fung
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
He, Yuyin
Hu, Bo & Hong Chen
2024. On the finiteness of complement clauses in Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Huang, Nick
Lee, Tommy Tsz-Ming & Ka-Fai Yip
Huang, Rui-heng Ray
Tang, Sze-Wing
Tang, Sze-Wing
2022. On the syntax of incompleteness. In New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 272], ► pp. 395 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
