Cover not available

In:Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 112

References (38)
References
Boeckx, Cedric & Hornstein, Norbert. 2003. Reply to “Control is not Movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 34(2): 269–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 431–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. The virtues of control as movement. Syntax 9(2): 118–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo A. Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 69–109. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1984. On the Content of Empty Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343–434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burukina, Irina. 2020. Mandative verbs and deontic modals in Russian: Between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds. In Proceedings of the 3rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 3), Mark Cobler, Susannah MacKaye & Michael T. Westcoat (eds), 28–39. Stanford CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Emde Boas (eds), 1–31. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32(3): 493–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 1988. On obligatory control. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(1): 27–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Silke. 2018. Locality, control, and non-adjoined islands. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(82): 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. On control. In Minimalist Syntax, Rendall Hendricks (ed.). Malden MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert & Polinsky, Maria. 2010. Control as movement: Across languages and constructions. In Movement Theory of Control [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 154], Maria Polinsky & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar [Studies in Linguistics 2]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Culicover, Peter W. 2003. The semantic basis of control in English. Language 79(3): 517–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1984. On binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417–459.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1975. Super equi-NP deletion is a pseudo-transformation. In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 5, 29–44. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. A Two-tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita. 1983. On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2018. Reducing pro and PRO to a single source. The Linguistic Review 35: 463–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, Hazel A. 2016. The semantics of partial control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2): 691–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Potsdam, Eric. 2002. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33(2): 245–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ružicka, Rudolf. 1983. Remarks on control. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 309–324.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A. & Pollard, Carl. 1991. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67: 63–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2014. Portuguese, Russian and the theory of control. In Proceedings of NELS 43, Vol. 2, Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole & Amanda Rysling (eds), 115–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 2007. Towards a typology of complement control. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47: 1–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek. 2011. Modal Existential Wh-constructions. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The PRO-wh connection in modal existential wh-constructions. An argument in favor of semantic control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31: 1163–1205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1992. Adjunct control. In Control and Grammar, Richard Kurth Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds), 297–322. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2002. Syntactic vs. semantic control. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 95–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue