Cover not available

In:Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 259–286

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

The (null) subject of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish

 | University of Vienna
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 17 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.09her
Abstract
In this paper, I present a corpus study of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish, investigating null and overt subjects with respect to their control properties. I provide quantitative as well as qualitative data which show that (i) some instances of (null) subjects in adjunct infinitives do not easily fall into a division of predicative vs. logophoric control (Williams 1992), but that topicality is a relevant factor as well (Landau 2013, 2019), and (ii) control in spoken Spanish adjunct infinitives is a scalar phenomenon, being located at the syntax-pragmatics interface.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Adjunct control between predication and logophoricity
  • 3.The (null) subject of Spanish adjunct infinitives – PRO or pro?
  • 4.A corpus study of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish
    • 4.1The data
    • 4.2Annotating controller choice for quantitative analysis
    • 4.3Results
    • 4.4Discussion
  • 5.Adjunct control in spoken Spanish data – some observations
  • 6.Towards an analysis: Discourse linking via C and preference scales for control
    • 6.1The case of null subjects in adjunct infinitives
    • 6.2The case of overt subjects in adjunct infinitives
    • 6.3On differences between types of adjunct infinitives
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (50)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1998. Parameterizing AGR: word order, V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 2009. A case for an Agree-based theory of control. In 11th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar Proceedings, 101–123. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (09 March 2021).
Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue / Tense and Point of View, Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 213–246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 69–109. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammatical classes. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 41–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina. 1987. Los infinitivos con sujetos léxicos en español. In Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas, Violeta Demonte & Marina Fernández Lagunilla (eds), 125–147. Madrid: Ediciones el arquero.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro – an interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2016. On some correlations between formal and interpretative properties of causal clauses. In Co- and Subordination in German and Other Languages, Ingo Reich, & Augustin Speyer (eds). Special issue of Linguistische Berichte 21: 153–179.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galán Rodríguez, Carmen. 1999. La subordinación causal y final. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 3597–3642. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Fernández, Luis. 1999. Los complementos adverbiales temporales. La subordinación temporal. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 3129–3208. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse – An introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Jeffrey J. 2019. A movement theory of adjunct control. Glossa – A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 87. 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. Topicalization, CLLD, and the left periphery. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003 [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35], Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 157–192. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbeck, Peter. 2015a. Overt PRO in Romance – Towards a unification of PRO and pro. In Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical Linguistics, Language Acquisition and Language Contact, [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4], Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras & Elena Valenzuela (eds), 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Unifying Pro-drop and Control – The Derivation of Spanish (Null) Subjects. PhD dissertation, University of Salzburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 1999. El infinitivo. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2197–2356. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, Nayudu, Aarti & Sheehan, Michelle. 2009. Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63(1): 59–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context, Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Noriko. 1993. Control and Arbitrary Interpretation in English. PhD dissertation, UMASS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. A Two-tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. A selectional theory of adjunct control. Ms, Ben Gurion University of the Negev.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23: 379–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2018. Reducing pro and PRO to a single source. The Linguistic Review 35(3): 463–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido. 2000. Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 2007. Observacions sobre la posició dels subjectes postverbals en català i castellà. Caplletra 42: 251–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paz, Justin. 2019. Revising the distribution of Control: Evidence from Spanish. Handout of talk presented at the workshop Crosslinguistic Variation in Control Phenomena, DGfS 41, University of Bremen.
Pérez Vázquez, Enriqueta. 2007. El infinitivo y su sujeto en español. Bologna: Gedit Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piera, Carlos. 1987. Sobre la estructura de las cláusulas de infinitivo. In Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas, Violeta Demonte & Marina Fernández-Lagunilla (eds), 148–166. Madrid: Ediciones el arquero.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pöll, Bernhard. 2007. On the licensing of overt subjects in Spanish infinitival clauses. Probus 19: 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PRESEEA. 2008. Marcas y etiquetas mínimas obligatorias. (Vers. 1.2. 17-02-2008). <[URL]> Consulted: 02.07.2019
R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]> (9 March 2021).
Rigau, Gemma. 1995. The properties of the temporal infinitive constructions in Catalan and Spanish. Probus 7: 279–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 1995. Construcciones concesivas con para. Revista Española de Lingüística 25: 99–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulte, Kim. 2007. Prepositional Infinitives in Romance – A Usage-based Approach to Syntactic Change. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–479Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42(2): 267–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol L. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 1 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2014. Making sense of silence: finiteness and the (OC) PRO vs. pro distinction – Commentary on Kissock (2013). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1998. Nominative subjects and pro-drop Infl. Syntax 1(2): 206–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderschueren, Clara. 2013. Infinitivo y sujeto en portugués y español. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1992. Adjunct control. In Control and Grammar, Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds), 297–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpora
PRESEEA (2014–): Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá. <[URL]> (4 February 2019).
REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: Banco de datos (CORPES XXI) [en línea]. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI (CORPES). <[URL]> (4 May & 18 November 2019).
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Krivochen, Diego Gabriel
2025. Subjecthood in Spanish meteorological verbs. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Landau, Idan
2024. Control, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue