In:Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 107–136
Get fulltext
On the obligatory versus no control split in Korean
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 17 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.04lee
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.04lee
Abstract
In Korean, Obligatory Control may, under certain
conditions, fail to obtain. We present non-canonical cases of
logophoric object control where (1) movement of the control clause,
and (2) an overt infinitival subject give rise to configurations
unexpectedly lacking the Obligatory Control signature; complements
to logophoric object control verbs thus exhibit an alternation
between Obligatory Control and No Control. In the No Control case,
however, the embedded subject remains subject to the restriction
that it cannot refer to the matrix author. We model the
Obligatory versus No Control split derivationally, and show that
control complementizers encode information sensitive to attitudinal
function.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 2.1Control complementizers
- 2.2Base and inverse order
- 2.3The orientation of control complementizers towards
attitudinal function
- 2.3.1The anti-AUTHOR restriction
- 2.3.2The AUTHOR restriction
- 2.3.3Conditions on the anti-AUTHOR restriction
- 2.4Overt infinitival subjects
- 2.5Interim summary
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1The control clause in the inverse order has moved
- 3.1.1The inverse control clause is selected by the control verb
- 3.1.2Extraction patterns
- 3.1.3The anti-reconstruction of control clause movement
- 3.2The OC-NC split
- 3.2.1PRO as a bound minimal pronoun
- 3.2.2Derivations
- 3.2.3The presence vs absence of obligatory de se
- 3.1The control clause in the inverse order has moved
- 4.Open issues
- 4.1Subject control
- 4.2Lifting the anti-AUTHOR restriction
- 4.3Outlook
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (49)
Ahn, Dorothy & Charnavel, Isabelle. 2017. Perspective
on Korean anaphors: Comparing inanimate cachey vs. animate
caki-casin. In Proceedings
of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics(WCCFL 34), Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds), 16–23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Barbosa, Pilar. 2009. A
case for an Agree-based Theory of
Control. In Proceedings
of the 11th Seoul International Conference on Generative
Grammar, Sun-Woong Kim (ed.), 101–123. Seoul: Hankuk.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2001. Scope
reconstruction and
A-movement. Natural Language
& Linguistic
Theory 19(1): 503–548.
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric
AGR. In The
Null Subject Parameter [Studies in
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
15], Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 69–109. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cho, Jai-Hyoung. 1994. Scrambling
in Korean: Crossover, Reconstruction and Binding
Theory. PhD
dissertation, The University of Connecticut.
Choe, Hyun-Sook. 2006. On
(backward) object control in
Korean. In Harvard
Studies in Korean Linguistics
XI, Susumu Kuno (ed.), 373–386. Cambridge MA: Harvard University, Department of Linguistics.
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella & Sung, Li-May. 1990. Principles
and parameters of long-distance
reflexives. Linguistic
Inquiry 21(1): 1–22.
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil. 2004. Backward
control in Korean and
Japanese. In University
College of London Working Papers in Linguistics
16, Ad Neelemn & Mary Pearce (eds), 57–83. London: UCL.
Doliana, Aaron & Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2021. Proxy
Control: A new species of control in
grammar. Natural Language
& Linguistic Theory.
Gamerschlag, Thomas. 2007. Semantic
and structural aspects of complement control in
Korean. In Studies
in Complement Control [ZAS Papers in
Linguistics 47], Barbara Stiebels (ed.), 61–123. Berlin: Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS).
Grewendorf, Günther & Sabel, Joachim. 1999. Scrambling
in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus multiple
specifiers. Natural Language
& Linguistic
Theory 17(1): 1–65.
Ha, Iljoo. 2004. Specificity
and intervention effects in
Korean. In Proceedings
of the 4th Workshop in General Linguistics (WIGL
4), Nathan Culwell-Kanarek (ed.), 21–31. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Heck, Fabian & Müller, Gereon. 2007. Extremely
local
optimization. In Proceedings
of the 26th Western Conference on Linguistics
(WECOL26), Erin Bainbridge & Brian Agbayani (eds), 170–183. Fresno CA: California State University.
. 2003. On
control. In Minimalist
Syntax [Generative Syntax
7], Randall Hendrick (ed.), 6–81. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kang, Arum. 2015. (In)definiteness,
Disjunction and Anti-specificity in Korean: A Study in the
Semantics-pragmatics
Interface. PhD
dissertation, The University of Chicago.
Kim, Ji-Hye & Yoon, James Hye Suk. 2009. Long-distance
bound local anaphors in Korean. An empirical study of the
Korean anaphor
cakicasin. Lingua 119(5): 733–755.
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2010. The
structures of modality in
Korean. In Proceedings
of the 6th Workshop on Altaic Formal
Linguistics, Hiroki Maezawa & Azusa Yokogoshi (eds), 171–180. Cambridge: MITWPL.
Kim, Sun-Hee. 1994. Division
of Labor between Grammar and Pragmatics: The Distribution
and Interpretation of
Anaphora. PhD
dissertation, Yale University.
Ko, Heejeong. 2018. Scrambling
in Korean
syntax. In Oxford
Research Encyclopedia of
Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making
a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of
pronouns. Linguistic
Inquiry 40(2): 187–237.
Kwon, Jongil. 2010. Scrambling
of Korean embedded
clauses. Studies in
Generative
Grammar 20(2): 229–249.
Kwon, Nayoung, Monahan, Philip & Polinsky, Maria. 2010. Object
control in Korean: A backward control
impostor. In Movement
Theory of Control [Linguistik
Aktuell/Linguistics Today
154], Norbert Hornstein & Maria Polinsky (eds), 299–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lee, Young-Suk. 1993. Scrambling
as Case-Driven Obligatory
Movement. PhD
dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Madigan, Sean William. 2008. Control
Constructions in Korean. PhD
dissertation, University of Delaware.
Mensching, Guido. 2000. Infinitive
Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis
of the Romance
Languages. Oxford: OUP.
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete
Category Cronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant
Movement in
German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mun, Bokyung. 2016. The
Interaction of Modality and Tense in
Korean. PhD
dissertation, Georgetown University.
Park, Jong Un. 2011. Clause
Structure and Null Subjects: Referential Dependencies in
Korean. PhD
dissertation, Georgetown University.
Polinsky, Maria. 2007. Object
control in Korean: Obligatory vs nonobligatory
control. In Studies
in Complement Control [ZAS Papers in
Linguistics 47], Barbara Stiebels (ed.), 197–217. Berlin: Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS).
Polinsky, Maria & Kwon, Nayoung. 2006. Object
control in Korean: Structure and
processing. In Proceedings
of the 15th Japanese/Korean Linguistics
Conference, Naomi McGloin & Junki Mori (eds), 249–262. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Polinsky, Maria, Monahan, Philip & Kwon, Nayoung. 2007. Object
control in Korean: How many
constructions? Language
Research 43(1): 1–33.
Royer, Justin. 2020. Binding
and coreference in mayan: Evidence for object
raising. Ms, McGill University. Talk given at
the 51st Annual Meeting of the
North East Linguistic Society at McGill
University.
Sisovics, Milena. 2018. Embedded
Jussives as Instances of Control: The case of Mongolian and
Korean. PhD
dissertation, MIT.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009. Overt
nominative subjects in infinitival complements
cross-linguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary
analyses. In Papers
in Syntax [NYU Working Papers in
Linguistics 2], Patricia Irwin & Violeta Vasquéz Rojas Maldonado (eds). New York NY: New York University, Department of Linguistics.
Uegaki, Wataru. 2011. Controller
shift in centered-world
semantics. Ms, MIT. Talk given
at Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Sprachwissenschaft 33 at the University of
Göttingen.
. 1985. On
the integrity of control
theory. In Proceedings
of the 15th North East Linguistic
Society, Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe & Joyce McDonough (eds), 389–408. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rastelli, Stefano, Giada Antonicelli, Beatrice Iaria, Pietro Mingardi & Francesca Pagliara
2025. Adult second language acquisition under negligible exposure and no instruction. Journal of Second Language Studies
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
