Cover not available

In:A Theory of Distributed Number:
Myriam Dali and Eric Mathieu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 269] 2021
► pp. 139–150

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Bibliography

Published online: 16 August 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.269.refs
Acquaviva, P. 2008. Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Singulatives. In Word Formation. An International Handbook for the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 1171–1192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Structures for plurals. Lingvisticae Investigationes 59: 217–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Categorization as noun construction: Gender, number, and entity types. In Gender and Noun Classification, E. Mathieu, M. Dali & G. Zareikar (eds), 41–63. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. 1991. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Nominalizations: A probe in the architecture of grammar, Part 1: The nominalization puzzle. Language and Linguistic Compass 4: 496–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anand, P., Andrews, C., Farkas, D. & Wagers, M. 2011. The exclusive interpretation of plural nominals in quantificational environments. In Proceedings of SALT 21, P. Saint-Dizier (ed.), 176–196. <[URL]> (19 February 2021).
Arad, M. 2005. Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 63]. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Locality constraints on the interpretations of roots. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arregi, K. & Nevins, A. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aspesi, F. 1990. Genre des noms et genre des morphèmes personnels en chamito-sémitique. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Hamito-Semitic Congress, Vol. 1, H. G. Mukařovski (Ed.), 11–28. Veröffentlichungen der Institute für Afrikanistik und Agyptologie der Universität Wien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bale, A., Gagnon, M. & Khanjian, H. 2010. Cross-linguistic representations of numerals and number marking. In Proceedings of SALT 20, Nan Li & David Lutz (eds), 1–15. <[URL]> (19 February 2021).
2011. On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness: The case of plural morphology. Morphology 21: 197–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bale, A. & Khanjian, H. 2014. Syntactic complexity and competition: The singular-plural distinction in Western Armenian. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C. 1992. Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics 9: 69–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeston, A. 1975. Some features of Modern Standard Arabic. Journal of Semitic Studies 20: 62–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belnap, K. 1991. Grammatical Agreement Variation in Cairene Arabic. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belnap, K. R. & Gee, J. 1994. Classical Arabic in contact: The transition to near-categorical agreement patterns. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics VI: Papers from the Sixth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 115], M. Eid, V. Cantarino & K. Walters (eds), 121–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belnap, K. R. & Shabaneh, O. 1992. Variable agreement and nonhuman plurals in Classical and Modern Standard Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics IV: Papers from the Fourth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 85], E. Broselow, M. Eid & J. McCarthy (eds), 245–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belnap, R. K. 1999. A new perspective on the history of Arabic variation in marking agreement with plural heads. Folia Linguistica 33: 169–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanc, H. 1970. Dual and pseudo-dual in the Arabic dialects. Language 46: 42–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bliss, H. 2004. The Semantics of the Bare Noun in Turkish. MA thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. 2017. Distributed morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Ouwayda, S. 2010. Men and their apples: Dividing plural and agreement plural. Paper presented at GLOW in Asia VIII, Beijing Language and Culture University.
Boris, G. 1945–1948. Sur l’emploi des pluriels féminins dans un parler arabe moderne. Comptes Rendus du Groupe Linguistique d’ Études Chamito-Sémitiques (GLECS), 21–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S. & Gaskell, M. G. 2002. A re-examination of the default system for Arabic plurals. Language and Cognitive Processes 17(3): 321–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brocklemann, C. 1908. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen. Berlin: Reuther Reichard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brustad, K. 2000. The Syntax of Spoken Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunt, H. 1985. The formal representation of (quasi-)continuous concepts. In J. Hobbs & R. Moore (eds), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, 37–70. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The minds response to repetition. Language 82: 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstens, V. 2000. Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against phi- (in)completeness. Syntax 4: 147–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caubet, D., Simeone-Senelle, M.-C. & Vanhove, M. 1989. Genre et accord dans quelques dialectes arabes. LINX 21: Genre et langage. Actes du colloque tenu à Paris X – Nanterre, les 14–16 décembre 1988.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, C.-Y. 1973. Response to Moravcsik. In Approaches to Natural Language, J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik & P. Suppes (eds), 286–288. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagerka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 1964. Remarques sur la dérivation nominale par affixes dans quelques langues sémitiques. Semitica 14: 73–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1975. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language 51(4): 406–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. Derivation, inflection, and semantic change in the development of the Chukchi verb paradigm. In Historical Semantics and Historical Word Formation, J. Fisiak (Ed.), 85–96. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Hybrid nouns and their complexity. In Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective, J. Fleischer, E. Rieken & P. Widmer (eds), 191–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowell, M. 1964. A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic (Based on the Dialect of Damascus). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dali, M. 2015. The Feminine Operator in Arabic. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. On the contrastive use of plurals in Tunisian Arabic. Ms, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Gender and Number in Tunisian Arabic: A Case of Allosemy. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dali, M. & Mathieu, E. 2016. Les pluriels internes féminins de l’arabe tunisien. Lingvisticae Investigationes 59: 253–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Broken plurals and (mis)matching of φ-features in Tunisian Arabic. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 12(2): 164–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., Mchombo, S. & Peters, S. 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Anna, L. 2017. Agreement in plural controllers in Fezzānī Arabic. Folia Orientala LIV: 101–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danon, G. 2011. Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14: 297–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Agreement alternations with quantified nominals in Modern Hebrew. Journal of Linguistics 49: 55–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, M. 2008. Size matters: Towards a syntactic decomposition of countability. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), Los Angeles, UCLA, 16–18 May, 116–122. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14(3): 173–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deal, A. R. 2017. Countability distinctions and semantic variation. Natural Language Semantics 25: 125–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. 1999. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, M. 2001. Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diakonov, I. M. 1965. Semito-Hamitic Languages: An Essay in Classification. Moscow: Central Department of Oriental Literature.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diertani, C. E. A. 2011. Morpheme Boundaries and Structural Change: Affixes Running Amok. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G. 1983. The Turkana Language. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 214–261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doetjes, J. 2012. Count/mass distinctions across languages. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Part III, C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds), 2559–2580. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donabédian, A. 1993. Le pluriel en arménien moderne. Faits de Langue 2: 179–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, E. & Müller, A. 2013. The cognitive basis of the mass-count distinction: Evidence from bare nouns. In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, C. Hofherr & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 73–101. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Driver, G. R. 1948. Gender in Hebrew numbers. Journal of Jewish Studies 1: 90–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, D. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, D. & Marantz, A. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, D. & Noyer, R. 2001. Movement after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 595–595.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enger, H. 2004. Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 3: 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36: 275–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erwin, W. M. 2004. A Short Reference Grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. 2010. The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. 1988. Agreement in Arabic, binding and coherence. In Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Description, M. Barlow & C. Ferguson (eds), 107–158. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 182]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Constructing Feminine to Mean: Gender, Number, Numeral, and Quantifier Extensions in Arabic. New York NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Multiple facets of constructional Arabic gender and ‘functional universalism’ in the DP. In Gender and Noun Classfication, É. Mathieu, M. Dali & G. Zareikar (eds), 67–92. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Féghali, M. & Cuny, A. 1924. Du genre grammatical en sémitique. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. 1989. Grammatical agreement in Classical Arabic and the modern dialects: A response to Versteegh’s Pidginization Hypothesis. Al-’Arabiyya 22(1–2): 5–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrando, I. 2006. The plural of paucity in Arabic and its actual scope: On two claims by Siibawayhi and Al-farraa. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XVI: Papers from the Sixteenth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Cambridge, March 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 266], S. Boudelaa (ed.), 39–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, W. 2002. A Grammar of Classical Arabic, 3rd edn, J. Rodgers (transl.). New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleisch, H. 1961. Traité de philologie Arabe. Beirut: Dar El-Machreq.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gebhardt, L. 2009. Numeral Classifiers and the Structure of DP. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghaniabadi, S. 2012. Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 112–128. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, J. 2003. Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 57: 47–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillon, C. 2015. Innu-aimun plurality. Lingua 162: 128–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Görgülü, E. 2012. Semantics of Nouns and the Specification of Number in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, J. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1966. Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies [Janua Linguarum Series Minor]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1972. Numeral classifers and substantive number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9: 2–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1974. Studies in numeral systems, I: Double numeral systems. Working Papers in Language Universals 14: 75–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimm, S. 2012a. Inverse number marking and individuation in Dagaare. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 75–98. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012b. Number and Individuation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 2005. Extended projection. In Words and Structure, J. Grimshaw (ed.), 1–74. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haelewyck, J.-C. 2016. Grammaire comparée des langues sémitiques. Bruxelles: Éditions Safran.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. 1997. Fission and impoverishment. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–449.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection, 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology, 275–288. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamedani, L. 2011. The Function of Number in Persian. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammerly, C. 2018. Limiting gender. In E. Mathieu, M. Dali & G. Zareikar (eds), Gender and Noun Classification, 93–118. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammond, M. 1988. Templatic transfer in Arabic broken plurals. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(2): 247–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbour, D. 2008. Mass, non-singularity, and augmentation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49: 239–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Valence and atomic number. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 561–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90: 185–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Impossible Persons. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, H. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4): 225–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, A. C. & Campbell, L. 1995. Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20: 271–287.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselbach, R. 2014a. Agreement and the development of gender in Semitic (Part I). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlāndischen Gesellschaft 164: 33–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014b. Agreement and the development of gender in Semitic (Part II). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlāndischen Gesellschaft 164: 319–344.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hetzron, R. 1967. Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies 12: 169–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hieda, O. 2006. On singulative languages in Nilotic languages. Nilo-Ethiopian Studies 10: 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. 1983. Plurality and conjunction. In Studies in Model-Theoretic Semantics, A. ter Meulen (ed.), 63–83. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holes, C. 1990. Gulf Arabic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, M. 1900. A Grammar of the Classical Arabic Language, Part I. Published under the authority of the Northwest Provinces and the Government of Oudh. Allahabad.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivlevia, N. 2013. Scalar Implicatures and the Grammar of Plurality and Disjunction. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. 1984. Yup’ik Eskimo Dictionary. Fairbanks AK: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienast, B. 2001. Historische semitische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kihm, A. 2003. Les pluriels internes de l’arabe: Système et conséquences pour l’architecture de la grammaire. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 32: 109–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Noun class, gender, and the lexicon-syntax-morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutsoukos, N. 2018. Constructional change on the contentful-procedural gradient. The case of the -idz(o) construction in griko. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language], K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé & G. Vanderbauwhede (eds), 263–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutsoukos, N. & Ralli, A. 2013. Elements with ambiguous morphological status: The marker -idz(o) in griko. Quaderns de Filologia 18: 13–23. Special issue on Theoretical and Empirical Advances in Word-formation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, R. 2009. Definite Markers, Phi-features, and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. PhD dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. A split analysis of plurality: Evidence from Amharic. Linguistic Inquiry 47(3): 226–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. A split analysis of plurality: Number in Amharic. Linguistic Inquiry 47(3): 527–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, R. & Winchester, L. 2018. Number and gender agreement in Saudi Arabic: Morphology vs. syntax. In The Proceedings of the 17th Texas Linguistic Society, F. Cooley, M. Everdell, H. Al Bulushi, A. Gutierrez Lorenzo, L. Orjuela & S. D. Gualapuro Gualapuro (ed.), 39–53. <[URL]> (25 February 2021).
Krifka, M. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds), 75–111. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of English and Chinese. In The Generic Book, M. Krifka, G. Carlson & J. Pelletier (eds), 389–411. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51: 55–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. 1980. On the notion affective in the analysis of negative-polarity items. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahrouchi, M. & Lampitelli, N. 2015. On plurals, noun phrase and num(ber) in Moroccan Arabic and Djibouti Somali. In The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in Honor of Jean Lowenstamm [Language Faculty and Beyond 12], S. Bendjaballah, N. Faust, M. Lahrouchi & N. Lampitelli (eds), 303–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahrouchi, M. & Ridouane, R. 2016. On diminutives and plurals in Moroccan Arabic. Morphology 26(3):453–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, I. 2015. DP-internal semantic agreement: A configurational analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 975–1020. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langdon, M. 1992. Yuman plurals: From derivation to inflection to noun agreement. International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 405–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lecarme, J. 2002. Gender “polarity”: Theoretical aspects of Somali nominal morphology. In Many Morphologies, P. Boucher & M. Plénat (eds), 109–141. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, M. M. 1971. The Plural of the Noun in Modern Standard Arabic. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. 1999. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Link, G. 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice-theoretic approach. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, R. Buerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds), 302–323. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipinski, E. 2001. Semitic Languages Outline of a Comparative Grammar, 2nd edn. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. 2008. On little n, ROOT, and types of nouns. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, J. Hartmann, V. Hegedus & H. van Riemsijk (eds), 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): Article 14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Words. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, S.-H. Choe, D.-W. Yang, Y.-S. Kim, S.-H. Kim & A. Marantz (eds), 191–222. Seoul: Dong-In Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martí, L. 2018. Inclusive plurals and the theory of number. lingbuzz/003528.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Inclusive plurals and the theory of number. Linguistic Inquiry 51(1): 37–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. 2009. On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. Article presented at the Mass/count workshop, University of Toronto, 7–8 February.
2012. Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 650–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. On the plural of the singulative. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Many a plural. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219], A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. L. Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 157–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. & Zareikar, G. 2015. Measure words, plurality, and cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Variation 15(2): 169–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. The syntax of higher plurals. Ms, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, O. 2013. Gender confusion. In Diagnosing Syntax, L. L.-S. Cheng & N. Corver (eds), 271–294. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. 1990a. Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(2): 209–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990b. Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics, II: Papers from the Second Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Salt Lake City, Utah 1988 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 72], Mushira Eid & John McCarthy (eds), 1–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1968. Review of ‘Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 3: Theoretical Foundations’. Language 44: 556–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975. Lexicography and the count-mass distinction. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 314–321.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1921. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Genève/Paris: Slatkine/Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinhof, C. 1912. Die Sprachen der Hamiten. Hamburg: L.R. Friederischsen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 1956. An Introduction to Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, M. 1988. Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds), 211–233. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The reordering of morphemes. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 43], J. Wohlgemuth & M. Cysouw (eds), 231–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammad, M. A. 1990. The problem of subject-verb agreement in Arabic: Towards a solution. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics, 1: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Salt Lake City, Utah 1987 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 63], Mushira Eid (ed.), 95–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murtonen, A. 1964. Broken Plurals, Origin and Development of the System. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, A. 2011. Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42(3): 413–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noyer, R. 1992. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ÓhAnluain, L. A. 1999. Graiméar Gaeilge na mBráithre Críostaí. Dublin: An Gúm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ojeda, A. 1992. The semantics of number in Arabic. In Proceedings of SALT 2, Chris Barker & David Dowty (eds), 303–326. <[URL]> (25 February 2021).
1995. The semantics of the italian double plural. Journal of Semantics 12(3): 213–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouwayda, S. 2014. Where Number Lies: Plural Marking, Numerals, and the Collective-distributive Distinction. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, H., Khan, M. & Snedeker, J. 2011. Even more evidence for the emptiness of plurality: An experimental investigation of plural interpretation as a species of scalar implicature. In Proceedings of SALT 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds). <[URL]> (26 February 2021).
Percus, O. 2011. Gender features and interpretation: A case study. Morphology 21(2): 167–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. 2014. On number and numberlessness in languages with andwithout articles. In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, P. Cabredo-Hofherr & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 52–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, O. 2014. Agreement and its Failures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, E. 1993. Where is gender? Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 795–803.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 1985. Agreement parameters and the development of english modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A. 1999. A formal approach to grammaticalization. Linguistics 37(6): 1011–1041. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. 2010. Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3): 343–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rullmann, H. & You, A. 2006. General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in mandarin chinese. In Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, K. von Heusinger & K. Turner (eds), 175–196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, U. 2003. A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of SALT 13, R. Young & Y. Zhou (eds), 258–275. <[URL]> (26 February 2021)..
Sauerland, U., Andersen, J. & Yatsuhiro, K. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), 413–433. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sağ, Y. 2016. On the semantics of classifiers: A new perspective from an optional classifier language, Turkish. lingbuzz/002999.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, R. 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Proceedings of NELS 39, S. Lima, K. Mullin & B. Smith (eds), 661–678. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siddiqi, D. 2018. Distributed morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory, J. Audring & F. Masin (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigler, M. 1996. Specificity and Agreement in Standard Western Armenian. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, P. 2015. Feature Mismatches: Consequences for Syntax, Morphology and Semantics. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, P. W. 2017. The syntax of semantic agreement in English. Journal of Linguistics 53(4): 823–863. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spector, B. 2007. Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher order implicature. In Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (eds), 243–281. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speiser, E. A. 1936. Studies in Semitic formatives. Journal of the American Oriental Society 56: 22–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E. 1962. The singular-plural contrast opposition in the Slavic languages. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 5: 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steriopolo, O. & Wiltschko, M. 2010. Distributed GENDER hypothesis. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics. Proceedings of Formal Description of Slavic Languages 7, G. Zybatow, P. Dudchuk, S. Minor & E. Pshehotskaya (eds), 155–172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, T. 2001. Singulative-collective: Natural morphology and stable classes in Welsh number inflexion on nouns. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 54: 52–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieu, L., Cory, B., Romoli, J. & Crain, S. 2014. Plurality inferences are scalar implicatures: Evidence from acquisition. In Proceedings SALT 24, T. Snider, S. D’Antonio & M. Weigand (ed.), 122–136. <[URL]> (26 February 2021).
Tsoulas, G. 2009. On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman & D. Hill (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57], 131–146. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, V. 2000. Pro properties, contra generalized kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 10, B. Jackson & T. Matthews (eds), 221–238. <[URL]> (26 February 2021).
Vásquez-Rojas, V. 2012. The Syntax and Semantics of Purépecha Noun Phrases and the Mass/count Distinction. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vries, H. 2013. Distributivity and agreement: New evidence for groups as sets. In Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, M. Aloni, M. Franke & F. Roelofsen (eds), 241–248. Amsterdam: ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Shifting Sets, Hidden Atoms: The Semantics of Distributivity, Plurality and Animacy. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, A. 2010. Vague quantity, numerals, and natural numbers. Syntax 13: 37–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, S. & Zlatić, L. 2003. The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford CA: CLSI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiltschko, M. 2008. The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 639–694. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Decomposing the mass/count distinction. Evidence from languages that lack it. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 120–146. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Y. 2001. Plural predication and the strongest meaning hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18: 333–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, J. 2012. Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, W. 1967. A Grammar of the Arabic Language, Vol. I. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2015. Does gender depend on number? Snippets 30: 14–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. 1987. System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology 10: 59–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zabbal, Y. 2002. The semantics of number in the Arabic noun phrase. MA thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zareikar, G. 2019. The Distribution and Function of Number in Azeri. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeuss, J. C. 1853. Grammatica Celtica. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, N. 2012. Countability and numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 220–237. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwarts, J. 2004. Competition between word meanings: The polysemy of around. Sinn und Bedeutung 8: 349–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zweig, E. 2009. Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 353–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue