Cover not available

In:Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 161–180

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
Another argument for the differences among wa-marked phrases

 | Meio University
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.267.08nak
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to argue that the focal stress and structural position determine the interpretation of wa-marked phrases in a Japanese sentence. Namely, our argument is, based on, and extended out of Nakamura (2017: 356–359), that in sentence initial position, wa-marked phrases denote Thematic Topic (tt) or Contrastive Topic (ct). Besides, our claim is that within vP domain, focally-stressed wa-marked phrase, denoted here as wa-marked phrase, signals Contrastive Focus (cf). In (1a), wa-marked phrase denotes exhaustivity. On the other hand, wa-marked phrase in (1b), which occurs below the VP adverb majimeni (=seriously), signals contrast.
(1)
a.
Iya,
no,
demo
but
ano-ronbun-wa
that paper-ei Focus
Taro-ga
T-Nom
yon-da
read-Past
(yo).
Par
‘Not, but Taro read that paper, and he read nothing more.’
b.
Majimeni
seriously
Taro-wa
t-tt
hon-4-satu-wa
book-4-cl-cf
yon-da
read-Past
‘Taro seriously read the four books (, opposed to four papers).
Through the examples of the scopal interactions between negation, verbs and focus particles and wa-marked phrases, we demonstrate that the wa-marked phrase in vP domain denotes contrastive focus (cf). We go on to propose the following elaborated left peripheries for both CP and vP territories.
(2)
a.
[TopP [FocP [TopP [TP [ vP [VP ….]]]]]: CP periphery
b.
[TopP [FocP [TopP [ vP [VP ….]]]]: vP periphery
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous analyses on the Japanese particle wa
  • 3.Japanese data
    • 3.1Types of adverbs and their structural positions
    • 3.2 wa-marked phrases and their structural positions
    • 3.3Scopal interactions between negation and wa-marked phrases
    • 3.4Scopal interactions between verbs and wa-marked phrases
    • 3.5Scopal interactions between focus particle and wa-marked phrases
    • 3.6Scopal interactions between DPs in DOC
  • 4.Hungarian and German data
    • 4.1Hungarian data
    • 4.2German data
  • 5.Elaborated left periphery in both CP and vP domains
  • 6.Conclusion, apparent problems, and theoretical implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (26)
References
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. ‘Inversion’ as focalization. In Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletii, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the Low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Shlonsky, Ur. 1995. The order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 489–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2007. Locality and Information Structure. A Cartographic Approach to Japanese. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujimaki, Kazuma. 2009. On the relative structural position of high adverbs and the interpretation of Ga-marked subject. Paper Presented at the 139th Meeting of the Linguistic Society of Japan.
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hara, Yurie. 2006. Grammar of Knowledge Representation. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2008. Japanese -Wa, -Ga, and information structure. In The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds), 54–83. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1977. Suuryoosi-no sintakkusu (Syntax of numeral quantifiers). Gengo 6(8): 83–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István. 1998. Adjuncts and arguments in VP-focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 61–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Identificational focus revisited: The issue of exhaustivity. Paper Presented at CLS 50.
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of Wa and Ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14: 1–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Namura, Koichiro. 2017. Japanese particle Wa with a focal stress provokes exhaustive identificational focus. In Studies on Syntactic Cartography: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Syntactic Cartography 2015, Fuzhen Si (ed.), 352–370. Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakamura, Koichiro. 2020. Types and functions of Wa-marked DPs and their structural distribution in a Japanese sentence. In Information Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series 213], Pierre-Yves Modicom & Olivier Duplâtre (eds), 161–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noda, Hisasi. 1984. Fukusi-no Gozyun. Nihongo Kyooiku 52: 79–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sano, Masaki. 2006. Toritate-si o Meguru Ninka Zyooken to Kara-setu (Licensing conditions on the focus particles and kara-clause). Scientific Approaches to Language 5: 49–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2010. Contrastive topic operates on speech act. In Information Structure: Theoretical Typological, and Experimental Perspective, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 115–138. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Embedded Wa-phrases, predication, and judgment theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 267–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomoioka, Satoshi. 2016. Information structure in Japanese. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 753–773, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 2006. Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 241–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue