In:Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 139–160
Chapter 7Causativity alternation in the lower field
Published online: 12 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.267.07naj
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.267.07naj
Abstract
We will argue in this paper that the lower field
of the sentence, little vP, is endowed with a new
functional category cause phrase (causP). We will severet
anticausativity from voice. We will propose that anticausative
morphology in standard Arabic (SA) is projected in syntax closer to
the root, between the root and v°. Our proposition has two important
consequences. The first one, it denies the existence of the strict
locality between a root and its categorizer. The second one, it
confirms that agentive and causer subjects will occupy different
hierarchical positions inside of the sentence (IP). We will see that
transcategorial derivations of derived nominals from the verb
conserves anticausative morphology, but it cannot do so with passive
morphology. This is a strong fact confirming the different syntactic
status of the two kinds of morphology. Moreover, the distribution of
agentive and causer subjects with subject oriented adverbs (SOA) and
manner adverbs (MA) shows an asymmetry between the two in linking
SOA and MA. We will explain this asymmetry between agent and causer
subjects by their different syntactic positions into the structure
of IP. Thereafter, we will extend our analysis to nominal events
too.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The morpho-syntactic nature of non-active morphology
- 2.1The multiples ways of anticausatives realization in SA
- 2.2Non-active morphology in SA
- 2.2.1On the difference between voice and anticausative morphology
- 2.2.2The homonymy of voice morphology
- 3.Anticausative morphology is not a part of the root
- 3.1Locality between roots and little v
- 4.Anticausative morphology and transcategorial derivation
- 5.Adverb distribution within anticausatives
- 5.1Repetitive and restitutive adverbs
- 5.2PP instruments and goals
- 6.Causativity and agentivity in event nominals
- 6.1Adverbs distribution in nominal domains
- 6.2Agentivity in event nominals
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References
References (68)
Alexiadou, Artemis & Lohndal, Terje. 2017. On the division of labor between roots and
functional structure. In The Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alexandro, Irene Franco & Àngel J. Gallego (eds), 85–104. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Spathas, Giorgos & Lechner, Winfried. 2015. On deriving the typology of repetition and
restitution. Paper presented at Glow 2015, Paris 8 and CNRS. Paris.
. 2013. Where is non-active morphology? In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Head-driven Phrase
Structure Grammar, Stefan Müller (ed.), 244–262. Stanford CA: CSLI.
. 2010. On the morpho-syntax of (anti-) causative
verbs. In Syntax Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edith Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 177–203. Oxford: OUP.
. 2009. On the role of syntactic locality in
morphological processus: The case of (Greek) derived
nominals. In Quantification, Definitness and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou & Monika Rathert (eds), 253–280. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäffer, Florian. 2006. The properties of anticausatives
cross-linguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (eds), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Everaert, Martin. 2004. The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Studies on the Syntax-Lexicon
Interface, 1–21. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb Placement. A Case Study in Antisymmetric
Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Alkaabi, Maera. 2015. The Anatomy of Arabic Words: The Role of the Root
in Representation and Processing. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Ayyat, Amjed Ahmed, Sultan, Fazal Mohamed & Yasin, Mohamed Subakir Mohd. 2013. A minimalist approach to short passive in
Standard Arabic. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
Sciences 7 (9): 375–382.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2014. Roots and domains, some remarks “On the Identity
of Roots”. Theoretical Linguistics 40: 299–310.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Samioti, Yota. 2014. Domaine within words and their meanings: A case
study. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds). Oxford: OUP.
. 2003. Locality constraints on the interpretation: The
case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778.
Aronoff, Mark. 2013. The roots of language. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology, Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Bayrou, Ahn. 2016. Severing internal arguments from their
predicates: An English case study. Paper presented at Swarthmore College, 8 January 2016.
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2013. In defense of the reflexivization analysis of
anti-causatives. Lingua 131: 199–216.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in
Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freiden, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowics (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Walthan MA: Ginn.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2014. On diagnosing complement-taking
roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40: 361–373.
Danbolt Ajer, Hanna. 2017. The middle voice, valency and Aktionsart in the
Arabic verb. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 10: 1–21.
De Belder, Marijke & van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2015. How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry 46(4): 625–655.
Doron, Edith. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of the semitic
templates. Natural Language Semantics 11: 1–67.
Dubinsky, Stanley & Simango, Sylvester Ron. 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for
modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72: 497–781.
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1988. Arabic passive affixes as aspectual predicates. Ms, MIT & Faculty of Letters, University of Rabat.
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi. 2008. Teleology and animacy in external
arguments. Lingua 118(2): 190–202.
. 2007. Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On
the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38(2): 197–238.
. 2005. Flavours of v: Consuming results in Italian &
English. In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds). Dordrecht: Springer.
Harley, Heidi. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate
functions of little v. In The Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Angél J. Gallego (eds). Oxford: OUP.
. 2013. External arguments and the mirror principal: On
the distinctness of voice and v. Lingua 125(1): 34–57.
. 2005. How do verbs take their names? Denominal verbs,
manner incorporation and the ontology of roots in
English? In Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect. Oxford: OUP.
Horvarth, Julua & Siloni, Tal. 2013. Anticausatives have no causer: Arejoindre to
Beavers and Koontz-Garboden. Lingua 131: 217–230.
Jason, Merchant. 2016. Roots don’t select: A novel argument from
category-dependent I-selection. Paper presented at 42nd meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, February 2016.
Kalluli, Dalina. 2006. A unifed analysis of passives, anticausatives and
reflexives. In Emperical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofher (eds), 201–225. <[URL]> (28 January 2021).
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew & Beavers, John. 2017. Change of state verbs and the semantics of
roots. In the Proceedings of 34th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics, Aaron Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds), 347–354. Somerville MA: The Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its
verb. In Phrase Structure and Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Levinson, Lisa. 2008. Deriving verb classes: Where roots semantics meets
syntax. Okland University, The Linguistics Department Colloquium Series.
Marantz, Alec. 2013a. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across
the interfaces. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris
Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 95–116. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2013c. Locating the verbal roots. Talk given at the 25th Scandinavian Conference of
Linguistics. Reykjavik, 13 May.
. 2007. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong-In Publishing.
. 2000. Words. Paper presented at the 20th West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics,
University of Southern California, 23–25 February.
Mccawley, James. D. 1968. The role of semantics in grammar. In Universals of Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds). New York NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Naji, Mohamed. 2016. On the ontology of roots and their
complements. In the Proceedings of The Japanese Society of Language
Sciences (JSLS), Conference Handbook. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
. 2010. Categorization and semantic function: The case of
the Arabic verb. Paper presented at the III Conference on The Representation of Event, Paris.
Maison de la Recherche, Université de la Nouvelle
Sorbonne, Paris III.
Piñón, Christopher. 2010. What to do with agent-oriented
adverbs. The 7th Workshop on Inferential Mechanisms and their
Linguistic Manifestation, Göttingen. Göttingen 4–5 June.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments [Linguistics Inquiry Monograph 49]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
von Stechow, Armin. 2007. Syntactic and Lexical Causativization: Become and Cause
Again. Ms., University of Tübingen.
