In:Romance Interrogative Syntax: Formal and typological dimensions of variation
Caterina Bonan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 266] 2021
► pp. 131–162
Chapter 4More on Trevisan wh-in situ
Published online: 17 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.266.c4
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.266.c4
Article outline
- Organisation of this chapter
- 4.1On wh-in situ in indirect wh-questions
- 4.1.1Thoughts on the syntax of se wh and wh-doubling
- 4.1.2Functional elements in the lower Left Periphery
- 4.1.3Se wh licenses an interrogative operator in SpecIntP
- 4.1.4Concluding remarks
- 4.2On wh-in situ within islands
- 4.2.1Trevisan strong islands and the puzzling optionality of subject-clitic inversion
- 4.2.2Massive pied-piping of strong islands
- 4.2.2.1Application to Trevisan strong islands
- 4.2.3Wh-phrases are bare within strong islands, but not within weak islands
- 4.2.4English limited pied-piping vs Trevisan tlingit-like syntax
- 4.2.5Concluding remarks
Notes
