Cover not available

In:Thetics and Categoricals
Edited by Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss and Yasuhiro Fujinawa
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262] 2020
► pp. 179–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Adjectives and mode of expression

Psych-adjectives in attributive and predicative usage and implications for the thetic/categorical discussion

 | Waseda University
Published online: 22 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.262.07mur
Abstract
The German psych-adjectives glücklich (happy) and traurig (sad) and their Japanese counterparts shiawase and kanashii are considered here with regard to their semantics, the hierarchy of thematic roles, and the mode of expression. The attributive usage has a semantic structure with broad focus on the entire structure, which shows a similarity to thetic judgments despite its nonpropositional status. By contrast, the predicative usage with the subject/topic as the stimulus denotes a permanent property of the entity evoking the emotion and consists of two components respectively with narrow focus, which corresponds to the double judgment of categoricals. This structure is possible owing to the property of the copulative predication that it gives the sentence definiteness, but does not give any semantic role to the arguments.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data
    • 2.1Attributive usage
    • 2.2Predicative usage
  • 3.Mode of expression and semantics
    • 3.1Contradiction with polysemy theory
    • 3.2Attribution and predication
    • 3.3Types of predication
    • 3.4Reorganization of the semantic structure
    • 3.5Implications for the thetic-categorical discussion
  • 4.Summary and prospects
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (18)
References
Aoki, Haruo. 1986. Evidentiality in Japanese. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 223–238. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holl, Daniel. 2001. Was ist modal an Modalen Infinitiven? In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 9], Reinmar Müller & MargaReis (eds), 217–238. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 2009. Gengo no kôzôseiyaku to jojutsukinô (Structural constraints and predication functions in language). Gengo Kenkyu 136: 1–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book, Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9(2): 153–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1994. Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In Proceedings of SALT 4, Mandy Harvey & Lynn Santelmann (eds), 220–229. Ithaca NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2002. Explizite und implizite Kodierung von Deontizität und Epistemizität. Jezikoslovlj 3(1–2): 69–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2003. Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Event semantics. In Semantics, Vol. 1 [HSK 33.1], Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 802–829. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muroi, Yoshiyuki. 2016a. Adjektive und Nomina – Deutsch und Japanisch im Vergleich. In Wie gleich ist, was man vergleicht?, Akio Ogawa (ed.), 240–262. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. Gefühlsadjektive – ihre Semantik und Konstruktion im Deutschen und Japanischen. In Akten Des XIII. Internationalen Germanistenkongresses Shanghai 2015 – Germanistik zwischen Tradition und Innovation, Band 2, Jianhua Zhu, Jin Zhao & Michael Szurawitzki (eds), 155–160. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020a. Zustand und Eigenschaft, Subjektstärke und Salienz: Thetik-Kategorik beim Gefühlsadjektiv im Deutschen und Japanischen. In Zur Architektur von Thetik und Kategorik. Deutsch, Japanisch, Chinesisch und Norwegisch [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 97], Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss & Shin Tanaka (eds), 242–265. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. Semantik und Konstruktion der Gefühlsadjektive im Deutschen und Japanischen. In Form, Struktur und Bedeutung, Hiroyuki Miyashita, Yasuhiro Fujinawa & Shin Tanaka (eds), 119–234. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muroi, Yosiyuki. Forthcoming. Detransitivität und Modalität im Deutschen und im Japanischen. Jahrbuch für Internationale Germanistik, Reihe A, Kongressberichte. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25(3): 511–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerfeldt, Karl-Ernst & Schreiber, Herbert. 1974. Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Adjektive. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide. 1985. Der Dativ im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue