Abe, Jun. 2014. Make short answers shorter: Support for the in-situ approach. Ms, Tohoko Gakuin University.
. 2015. The In-situ Approach to Sluicing [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 222]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abe, Jun & Tancredi, Christopher. 2013. Non-constituent deaccenting and deletion: A phase-based approach. Ms, Tohoku Gakuin University and Keio Tancredi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne, Bîlbie, Gabriela & Mouret, François. 2014. A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 15], Hans C. Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds), 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus. 2012a. Don’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. Presented at Islands in Contemporary Linguistic Theory. < [URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 229–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Locality of covert operations: Lessons from multiple sluicing. Paper presented at the Ellipsis across Borders Conference, 20–21 June, Sarajevo University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad. 2009. Universal 20 without the LCA. In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró & Joan Solà (eds). Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch. 2004. The Morphosyntax of Complement – Head Sequences. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2003. Core Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2011. The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. What ellipsis can do for phases, and what it can’t, but not why. Linguistic Review 33(4): 453–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1989. Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
An, Duk-Ho. 2007. Syntax at the PF Interface: Prosodic Mapping, Linear Order, and Deletion. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1997. Clitic left disloation and contrastive left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds), 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 1, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 519–581. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angelopoulos, Nikos and Dominique, Sportiche 2017. Scrambling(s)+clitics=CLLD (The case of French). Paper presented at the 2016 Going Romance conference at Goethe Universität FrankfurtGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1): 31–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 539–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Astruc, Lluisa. 2004. Right dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Haegeman, Liliane. 2015. French adverbial clayses, rescue by ellipsis and the truncation vs intervention approach. Probus 27: 33–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2008a. German right dislocation and afterthought in discourse. In Constraints in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 172], Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds), 225–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In ‘Subordination’ vs. ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Catherine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria & Buecking, Sebastian. 2008. Dislocating NPs to the right: Anything goes? Semantic and pragmatic constraints. In Proceedings of SuB12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 32–46. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Horn, George. 1976. Remarks on ‘Conditions on Transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 265–299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 2012. Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 614–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrenechea, Ana María. 1973. A propósito de la elipsis en la coordinación. In Studia Hispanica in Honorem R. Lapesa, Vol. II, 105–121. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew. 2014. Sluicing and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew, Elliott, Patrick & Thoms, Gary. 2014. There is no island repair. Ms, Rutgers, UCL & University of Edinburgh.
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 2009. Foco oracional y polaridad: En torno a una asimetría entre el español y el catalán. In Actas del VIII cogreso internacional de historia de la lengua española, Emilio Montero Cartelle (ed.), 2621–2636. Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1998. Inversion as focalization. Ms, University of Siena.
. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & J.-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belloro, Valeria A. 2015. To the Right of the Verb: An Investigation of Clitic Doubling and Right Dislocation in Three Spanish Dialects. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 2001. The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, G. 1985. Dislocazioni a sinistra e grammatica dell’italiano parlato. In Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria e applicazioni descrittive, Annalisa Franchi de Bellis & Leonardo Maria Savoia (eds), 59–82. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2(1): 43–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bleam, Tonia. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Bocci, Giuliano. 2013. The Syntax-prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 63]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1984. Aproximació a l’entonació del català central. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
. 1990. Subjects in Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boone, Enrico. 2015. The Syntax and Licensing of Gapping and Fragments. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Gallego, Ángel. 2014. Reconsidering subextraction: Evidence from Spanish. Borealis 3: 223–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Picallo, Carme. 1996. Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics 32: 349–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brucart, José M. 1987. La elisión sintáctica en español. Bellaterra: Publicacions de la UAB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. La elipsis. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2787–2863. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brucart, José M., Gallego, Ángel & Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2019. Ellipsis (in Romance languages). Ms, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Uniwersytet Gdański.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2009. Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP hypothesis is wrong. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 27–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21(1): article 5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunetti, Lisa. 2003. “Information” focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds), 95–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buell, Leston. 2008. VP-internal DPs and right-dislocation in Zulu. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 25, Marjo van Koppen & Bert Botma (eds), 37–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2002. Wh-doubling: Implications for the syntax of wh movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 157–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The coarse structure of the center periphery. Ms, Rutgers University.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56: 29–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53: 40–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12(1): 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Chierchia, Gennaro. 1999. Reconstruction in dislocation constructions and the syntax/semantics interface. In WCCFL 17: The Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Kinary N. Shahin, Susan Blake & Eun-Sook Kimpp (eds), 132–146. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2015. Please do not move that remnant too much! In Remnant Movement, Günther Grewendorf (ed.), 179–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, P. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (eds). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honour of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, Robert Freidin & Carlos Peregrín Otero (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 2005. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Rebecca Cover & Yuni Kim (eds), 73–91. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, Ladusaw, William & McCloskey, James. 2011. Sluicing(:) Between structure and inference. In Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds), 31–50. San Diego CA: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397–412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Topic constructions in some European languages and connectedness. In Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsijk (eds), 7–41. Tilburg: KUB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Types of A-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. In CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition, Vol.2, Vicenzo Moscati (ed.), 43–59. Siena: Università degli Studi di Siena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Constantini, Francesco. 2005. On obviation in subjunctive clauses: The state of the art. Annali di CaFoscari 44(1-2): 97–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2001. Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Mary Andronis (ed.), 133–147. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crocco, Claudia. 2013. Is Italian clitic right dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of YN-questions and statements. Lingua 133: 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 120: 50–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cat, Cécile. 2002. French Dislocation. PhD dissertation, University of York.
De Cat (2007) French dislocation without movement, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 485–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cat, Cécile. 2007. French Dislocation. Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussaire, Elisabeth, Doetjes, Jenny & Sleeman, Petra. 2004. Dislocation. In Handbook of French Semantics, Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds), 505–530. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Depiante, Marcela. 2000. The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
. 2004. Dos casos de elipsis con partícula de polaridad en español: Evidencia a favor de una visión no uniforme de la elipsis. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística 1: 53–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2005. A comment on the topic of topic-comment. Lingua 115: 691–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1990. Clitic doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3): 351–397.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Döring, Sandra. 2015. Parentheticals are – presumably – CPs. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 109–145. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. (2011). The prosody of dislocation in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 121: 722–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duarte, Ineŝ & Figuereido-Silva, M. Cristina. 2016. The null subject parameter and the structure of the sentence in EP and BP. In The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, W. Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds), 234–253. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The architecture of topic and focus. In The Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 33–58. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escobar, Linda. 1995. Lefthand Satellites in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Espinal, Maria Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2016. Complementizer phenomena in Spanish: Information structure and its syntactic manifestation. Borealis 5(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2006. On pure syntax (uncontaminated by information structure). In A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuss (eds), 137–157. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo. 2008. The Prosody-Syntax Interface in Catalan. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Sentential Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 168]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Lagunilla, Marina. 1983. El comportamiento de "un" con sustantivos y adjetivos en función de predicado nominal. Sobre el llamado "un" enfático. In Serta Philologica F. Lázaro Carreter, 195–208. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Rubiera, Francisco J. 2014. When phonology undergenerates: Evidence from Asturian enclitic structures. In Proceedings of the 40th Berkeley Linguistics Society, 85–101. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2012. The Syntax of PredNPs. MA thesis, University College London.
. 2013. How left is right? Locating Romance CLRD. In XXIII Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Topics at the left edge of infinitive clauses in Spanish and Catalan. Borealis 5(2): 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Embedded gapping isn’t gapping. Ms, UAB/CLT.
. 2019. Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 55(1): 53–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert & May, Robert. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortin, Catherine. 2007. Indonesian Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Fox, Danny. 1999a. Focus, parallelism and accomodation. In Proceedings of the 9th SALT, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 70–90. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999b. Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francesconi, Armando. 2005. La dislocación en la sintaxis italiana y española. Aspectos textuales y traductivos. Actas del XXIII AISPI (Associazione ispanisti italiani), 202–222.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 2005. What is “that”? Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 33–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-phonology Interface in Topic and Focus Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality. A comparative analysis or left and right topic constructions in Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds), 99–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Dislocations and framings. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elizabeth Stark (eds), 472–501. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Generalizations across Languages [Linguitstik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Ramaglia, Francesca. 2013. (Pseudo)clefts at the syntax-prosody-discourse interface. In Cleft Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 208] Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 97–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn & Clifton Jr, Charles. 2005. The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8(2): 121–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2004. Notes on the syntax and pragmatics of German left dislocation. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 203–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2012. El margen derecho del enunciado. Revista Española de Lingüística 42(2): 63–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukaya, T. 2007. Sluicing and Stripping in Japanese and Some Implications. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Gallego, Ángel. 2009a. Defective C-T in Romance. Probus 21: 163–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Ellipsis by phase. Paper presented at the XIX CGG, EHU-UPV.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1996. Is there a FocusP and a TopicP in the noun phrase structure? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6(2): 105–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gracanin-Yuksek, Martina. 2007. On Sharing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther. 2002. Left dislocation as movement. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 31–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, James. 2013. Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers and constituent modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(1): 191–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. On appositives. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the P-stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement. Glossa 4(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, James & Lipták, Anikó. 2014. Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax 17(3): 189–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2000. A movement approach to contrastive left dislocation. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 25: 3–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2002. Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure: A Study of Word Order and the Left Periphery in Mexican Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & González-Rivera, Melvin. 2013. Spanish PredNPs and the left periphery. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th HLS, Jennifer Cabrelli-Amaro (ed.), 1–14. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbial: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Nawada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 640–649. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverb Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2006. Mittelfeld phenomena (Scrambling in Germanic). In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 204–274. Malden MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian. 2004. Hallidays Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument Licensing and Agreement in Zulu. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Halpert, Claire & Zeller, Jochen. 2013. Right dislocation and raising-to-object in Zulu. Ms, University of Minnesota and University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Deletion in Coordinate Structures. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harizanov, Boris. 2014. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4): 1033–1088. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katherina. 2000. Right Node Raising and Gapping. Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2008. Morphology at the Interfaces. Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herburger, Elena. 2000. What Counts. Focus and Quantification. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 2001. En bonito lío me he metido! Notas sobre la afectividad en español. Moenia 7: 93–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007a. Emphatic polarity and C in Spanish. In Studies in Spanish Syntax, Laura Brugè (ed.), 105–150. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. From polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries between bien and sí in Spanish. In Coreference, Modality and Focus, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 111], Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds), 133–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Brucart, José M. 1987. La sintaxis, 1: Principios teóricos. La oración simple. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Suñer, Avellina. 1999. La predicación no copulativa. Las construcciones absolutas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española,Vol.2, Ch.39, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herringa, Herman. 2012. A multidominance approach to appositional constructions. Lingua 122(6): 554–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Syntax: Theory and Analysis, Vol. 1, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 324–383. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Iatridou, Sabine. 1995. Clitics and island effects. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Roumyana Izvorski & Victoria Tredinnick (eds), 11–30. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irurtzun, Aritz. 2007. The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
. 2009. Why Y: On the centrality of syntax in the architecture of grammar. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 141–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. On the nature and distribution of split wh-questions in Basque. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop at the UAB, November.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 39–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2014. A feature Inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2006. Gapping. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 407–435. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 289–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalbertodt, Janina, Primus, Beatrice & Schumacher, Petra. 2015. Punctuation, prosody and discourse: Afterthought vs. right dislocation. Frontiers in Psychology 6. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Why there are no directionality parameters? In WCCFL 28: Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), 2–23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula. 1986. Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 2009. What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119(12): 1788–1810. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimura, Hiroko. 2010. A wh-in-situ strategy for sluicing. English Linguistics 27: 43–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies. 2014. Who, me? Ellipsis in inquisitive fragment answers. Paper presented at the TINdag 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies, Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark (eds). 2015. Parenthesis and Ellipsis: Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies & de Vries, Mark. 2013. Cumulative rightward processes. In Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 200], Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer & Heike Walker (eds), 281–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kölbel, Max. 2003. Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1978. Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, Samuel J. Keyser (ed.), 53–64. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms, University of Groningen.
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 593–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Féry, Caroline. 2008. Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Unity and Diversity of Languages, Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1978. Danwa-no Bunpoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert D. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981. Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond II:6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Eva. 1979. La dislocation en français. Étude de syntaxe générative. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31, Vol.2, Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds), 301–320. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Multiple sluicing in English? Syntax 17(1): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Stowell, Tim. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4): 687–720.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurens, Frédéric. 2008. French predicative verbless utterances. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Muller (ed.), 152–172. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Shik. 2009. A verb initial single clause analysis of right dislocated constructions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 57: 127–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell, Victoria. 2009. Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, Tommi. 2014. The preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 332–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Language Sound Structure, Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (eds), 157–233. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Vivian. 2002. Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, Luis. 1999. VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Probus 11(2): 263–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Dislocations. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 402–421. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luján, Marta. 1999. A unified approach to control and obviation. In Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Papers in Honor of Mario Saltarelli . [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 187], Jon A. Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martín, 104–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita. 1994. Syntactic dependencies and their properties: A note on strong islands. Ms, University College London.
Mayol, Laya. 2007. Right dislocation in Catalan. Languages in Contrast 7(2): 203–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Resumptive pronouns, A-bar binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 199–248. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Resumption. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 94–117. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. Resumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 24: 471–481.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Revisiting syntactic identity conditions. Handout given at the Workshop on ellipsis, University of California, Berkeley.
. 2010. Three kinds of ellipsis. In Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity, Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds), 141–192. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion of ’sentence’. In Issues in Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Henry and Renée Kahane, Braj Kachru (ed.), 719–751. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko. 2002. Prominence mismatches and differential object marking in Bantu. In Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 292–314. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. 2016. Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa. A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi, Kriszta. 2004. Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 149–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko (eds). 2012. The Syntax of Topic, Focus and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neijt, Anneke. 1979. Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1998. Multiple sluicing in Japanese and the functional nature of wh-phrases. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 121–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nykiel, Joanna. 2013. Clefts and preposition omission in sluicing. Lingua 123: 74–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation. English Language and Linguistics 21: 127–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, New York.
. 1998. Postverbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 313–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela. 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormazábal, Javier & Romero, Juan. 2011. Object clitics and agreement. Ms, University of the Basque Country, University of Extremadura.
Ortega-Santos, Iván. 2016. Focus-related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, Iván, Yoshida, Masaya & Nakao, Chizuru. 2014. On ellipsis structures involving a wh-remnant and a non-wh-remnant simultaneously. Lingua 138: 55–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis. 2008. Notes on noun ph(r)ases. Ms, Harvard University.
. 2012. Movement and ellipsis in contrastive left-dislocation. In WCCFL 30: Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennet (eds), 281–291. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark. 2012. Thinking in the right direction: An ellipsis analysis of right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands 29: 123–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Right dislocation as deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(2): 641–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis & Struckmeier, Volker. 2016. Deletion in clausal ellipsis: Remnants in the middle field. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 22: 225–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padilla, Xavier. 2001. El orden de palabras en el español coloquial. València: Publicaciones Universitat de València.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Myung-Kwan & Kim, Sun-Woong. 2009. The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and Delete. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 17: 25–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana. 2006. Great coffee, that Maxwell House. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana & Stainton, Robert. 2006. Really Intriguing, that Pred NP! Philosophy Publications, paper 24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Bello, G. 1998. Uso de las dislocaciones a la derecha y a la izquierda en castellano e italiano. Interlingüística 9: 253–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philippova, Tatiana. 2014. P-omission under sluicing, P-clitic and the nature of P-stranding. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XXII, Martin Kohlberg, Kate Bellamy & Eleanor Dutton (eds), 133–155. Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Picallo, Carme. 1985. Opaque Domains. PhD dissertation, CUNY.
Planas-Morales, Sílvia & Villalba, Xavier. 2013. The right periphery of interrogatives in Catalan and Spanish: Syntax/prosody interactions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2004. On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 251–296. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, Omar. 2009. Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 619–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar. 2002. Entonació. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, M. Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 393–462. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1984. Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional analysis. In Discourses in Reading and Linguistics, Sheila White & Virginia Teller (eds), 213–225. New York NY: Anyas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reich, Ingo. 2006. Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. In Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, Pascal Denis (ed.), 69–78. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2008. Phi-agree and theta-related case. In Phi Theory, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 83–129. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria L. 1980. On left dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 363–393.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–557.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Relativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Structures and Beyond, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano. 2016. The left periphery of the clause – primarily illustrated for Italian. Ms, to appear in Blackwell Companion to Syntax,2nd edn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca, Francesc. 1999. La determinación y la modificación nominal en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Rodman, Robert. 1974. On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 7: 437–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene, Nevins, Andrew & Vicente, Luis. 2009. Cleaving the interaction between sluicing and P-stranding. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], Danièle Torck & W. Leo Wetzels (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene & Saab, Andrés. 2018. The limits of pseudo-sluicing. Paper presented at the VIII Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the 5th RegionalMeeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert Binnick et al.. (eds), 252–286. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Heidolph (eds), 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, M. 1999. L’intonation. Le système du français: description et modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubio, Carlos. 2014. Syntactic Constraints on Topicalization Phenomena. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Sæbø, Kjell J. 1997. Topic, focus and quantifier raising. In Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, Paul Dekker & Michael Franke (eds), 67–72. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Judgement ascriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 327–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sailor, Craig & Schütze, Carson T. 2014. Is there repair by ellipsis? Ms, University of Groningen and UCLA.
Sailor, Craig & Thoms, Gary. 2014. On the non existence of non constituent coordination and non constituent ellipsis. In WCCFL 31: Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 361–370. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. When right dislocation meets the left periphery. Lingua 116: 687–755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Information structure in Italian clauses. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop, UCL, November.
. 2009. Topic, focus and background in Italian clauses. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jakob (eds), 359–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Interaction of Focus and Givenness. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santos, Ana Lucía. 2009. The problem of fragment answers. Iberia 1(1): 115–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20: 339–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1977. Constraints on coordination. Language 53: 86–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Stefan. 2007. Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints in the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes. 2012. Dislocación a la izquierda y a la derecha: Semejanzas y diferencias. In Cum corde et in nova grammatica: Estudios ofrecidos a Guillermo Rojo, Tomás Jiménez-Juliá et al.. (eds), 791–805. Santiago de Compostela: Servizio de Publicacións da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Dislocación a la izquierda y derecha en España y Latinoamérica. Lingüística 29(2): 153–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1978. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Nordic Prosody, Torsten Fretheim (ed.), 128–149. Trondheim: TAPIR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In Papers in Optimality Theory, Vol. 18, Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne C. Urbanczyk (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith & Alan C. L. Yu (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin. 2009. German and English left-peripheral elements and the ‘orphan’ analysis of non-integration. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 366–397. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin, Cook, Philippa, Frey, Werner & Maienborn, Claudia (eds). 2009. Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner. 2003. Integrated and non-integrated left peripheral elements in German and English. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, 435–484. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko, Drummond, Alex, Schwarz, Bernhard & Wagner, Michael. 2015. Movement and ellipsis in afterthought right dislocation, sluicing and fragments. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association. Ottawa: CLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shopen, T. 1972. A Generative Theory of Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Sportiche, Dominique. 2006. Reconstruction, binding, and scope. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 35–93. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197–214. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stepanov, A. 2001. Cyclic Domains in Syntactic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Stigliano, Laura. 2018. Revisiting the interaction between P-stranding and clausal ellipsis in Spanish. Ms, The University of Chicago.
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Stoyanova, Marina. 2008. Unique Focus: Languages without Multiple Wh-questions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 123]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 391–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczegielniak, Adam. 2008. Islands in sluicing in Polish. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 404–412. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shiochi & Husley, Sarah. 2009. Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/A’-distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 387–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takita, Kensuke. 2012. Pseudo-right dislocation and the bare-topic construction in Japanese. Nauzan Linguistics 8: 147–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2001. Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics 37: 551–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher. 1992. Deletion, Deaccenting and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Temmerman, Tanja. 2013. The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(1): 235–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S. 1986. Basic Word Order. Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toosarvandani, Maziar. To appear. Embedding the antecedent in gapping: Low coordination and the role of parallelism. Linguistic Inquiry.
Torrego, Esther. 1998. Pronouns and determiners: A DP analysis of Spanish nominals. University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Torrence, Harold. 2005. On the Distribution of Complementizers in Wolof. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
. 2013. The Clause Structure of Wolof: Insights into the Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 198]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. The syntax-phonology interface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Paul de Lacy (ed.), 435–456. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Some distinctions in the German Nachfeld. Ms, ZAS Berlin.
. 2015. Intonation phrases and speech acts. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 301–349. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause. In: Innersentential Propositional Proforms. Syntactic Properties and Interpretative Effects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 232], Werner Frey, André Meinunger & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 105–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umbach, Carla. 2016. Evaluative propositions and subjective judgements. In Subjective Meaning, Cécile Meier & Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink (eds), 127–168. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valmala, Vidal. 2007. The syntax of little things. Ms, UPV/EHU.
. 2014. Island repair by ellipsis: Handle with care. In XI Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Phonology, 5–6 June, Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (ed.). 2009. Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Merchant (eds). 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 701–745. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vat, Jan. 1981. Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20: 80–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vicente, Luis. 2008. Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Villalba, Xavier. 1996. Sobre la dislocació a la dreta. Llengua i Literatura 7: 209–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, Olga Fultana & Fransesc Roca (eds), 227–241. Girona: University of Girona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Nihil est in LF quod prius non fuerit in SS. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 239–252.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Syntax of the Sentence Periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
. 2007. La dislocació a la dreta en català i castellà: Microvariació en la intefície sintaxi/pragmàtica. Caplletra 42: 273–302.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier & Bartra-Kauffman, Anna. 2009. Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua 120(4): 819–849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse. 1991. French non-verbal exclamative constructions. Probus 3: 77–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2009. Specifying coordination: An investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. In Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, Cynthia R. Dreyer (ed.), 37–98. New York NY: Nova.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. Locality and right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands 30: 160–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. Unconventional mergers. In Ways of Structure Building, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 143–166. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Parenthetical main clauses – or not? On appositives and quasi-relatives. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Lliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 177–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
. 2013b. Multidominance and locality. Lingua 134: 149–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Arthur. 2007. Sluicing and resumption. In NELS 37: Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew. 2012. Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16: 105–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wells, John C. 2006. English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitman, John. 2000. Right dislocation in English and Japanese. In Syntactic and Functional Explorations in Honor of Susumu Kuno, Kenichi Takami, Akio Kamio & John Whitman (eds), 445–470. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris. 1995. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13]. Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1978. Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne. 2005. Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2017. Stripping and topless complements. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2): 341–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagiu, Rodica. 2013. Information structure. In The grammar of Romanian,Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), 568–574. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2012. Object marking in Zulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2): 219–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zerbian, Sabine. 2007. Phonological phrasing in Northern Sotho (Bantu). The Linguistic Review 24: 233–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1994. Grammatical representation of topic and focus: Implications for the structure of the clause. Cuadernos de Lingüística 2: 181–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2001. Backgrounding (right-dislocation) in Dutch. Ms, University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue