In:Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew
Edited by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Yael Reshef and Moshe Taube
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 256] 2019
► pp. 179–200
From written to spoken usage
The contribution of pre-revival linguistic habits to the formation of the colloquial register of Modern Hebrew
Published online: 18 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.256.07res
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.256.07res
The formation of the colloquial register of Modern Hebrew has been
customarily attributed to the effects of speech revival. Based on an
extensive textual examination of pre-modern texts, this paper suggests that
some of the most conspicuous features of contemporary colloquial usage in
fact reflect continuity with pre-existing linguistic habits which were
well-rooted among Jewish writers prior to speech revival. These features
were naturally transferred to speech by first generation L2 speakers, but
due to their incompatibility with the classical models (on which literary
language as well as linguistic education were based), they were interpreted
by native-born L1 speakers as bearing a colloquial flavor. Recognition of
this process sheds new light on the formation processes of Modern Hebrew.
Moreover, it may have more general implications for our understanding of the
mechanisms of language change, as it indicates that colloquial language does
not have to be formed by actual speakers, but can be the result of language
development that occurred in periods where the language was only used for
writing.
Keywords: colloquial register, speech and writing, language genesis
Article outline
- 1.Theoretical background
- 2.The scope of the study
- 3.Grammatical agreement
- 3.1Existential and possessive constructions
- 3.2Unaccusative verbs
- 3.3Numerals
- 3.4Non-specificity determiner
- 4.Definiteness
- 4.1The definite construct chain
- 4.2Numerals
- 4.3Noun + adjective
- 5.Morphology
- 5.1Future tense instead of the imperative
- 5.2Conjugation of prepositions
- 5.3Morphological alternations
- 6.Function words
- 6.1Word order in adjective grading
- 6.2Specific lexical items
- 7.Summary
Notes References
References (51)
Berman, Ruth A. 2011. Revisiting impersonal constructions in Modern
Hebrew. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic
Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 323–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Betzer, Zvi. 2001. History of the Hebrew Language: The Medieval Division – Unit 7:
Rabbinic Hebrew. Tel Aviv: The Open University. (in Hebrew)
Blanc, Haim. 1965. Yiddish influences in Israeli Hebrew. In The Field of Yiddish: Studies in Language, Folklore and
Literature (Second Collection), Uriel Weinreich (ed.), 185–201. The Hague: Mouton.
Britain, David & Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Migration, new-dialect formation and sociolinguistic
refunctionalisation: Reallocation as an outcome of dialect
contact. Transactions of the Philological Society 97: 245–256.
Doron, Edit (ed.). 2016. Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew [Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 84]. Leiden: Brill.
Doron, Edit & Meir, Irit. 2013a. Degrammaticalization as linguistic change: The case of
the definite article in Modern Hebrew. Leshonenu 75: 317–358. (in Hebrew)
Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1996. The emergence of a native Hebrew culture in Palestine,
1882–1948. In Essential Papers on Zionism, Jehuda Reinharz & Anita Shapira (eds), 727–744. London: Cassell.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. On the VS word order in Israeli Hebrew: Pragmatics and
typological change. In Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: The
Transformational-Generative Approach, Peter Cole (ed.), 153–181. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Glinert, Lewis. 1987. Hebrew-Yiddish diglossia: Type and stereotype
implications of the language of Ganzfried’s “Kitzur”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 67: 39–55.
. 1988. Did pre-revival Hebrew literature have its own “langue”?
Quotation and improvization in Mendele Mokher
Sefarim. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 51(3): 413–427.
. 1991. On the sources of colloquial Modern Hebrew: The covert
syntax of Yellin’s Primer lefi hataf
. Leshonenu 55: 107–126. (in Hebrew)
. 2006. The Hasidic tale and the sociolinguistic modernization of
the Jews of Eastern Europe. In Ma’aseh Sippur: Studies in Jewish Narrative, Rella Kushelevsky & Avidov Lipsker (eds), 7–36. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press.
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1996. Hebrew as a living Semitic language. In Evolution and Revival: Trends in the Development of the Hebrew
Language, Joshua Blau (ed.), 148–168. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. (in Hebrew)
Gonen, Einat & Rubinstein, Doron. 2016. The numerals in a spontaneous corpus of colloquial
Hebrew. In Studies in Spoken Hebrew [Te‘uda: The Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies Research
Series 27], Einat Gonen (ed.), 369–395. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press. (in Hebrew)
Goshen-Gottstein, Moshe. 2006. Syntax and Vocabulary of Medieval Hebrew. Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute. (in Hebrew)
Harshav, Benjamin. 1993. Language in Time of Revolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Kaddari, Menahem Zvi. 1991. Post-Biblical Hebrew Syntax and Semantics: Studies in Diachronic
Hebrew, Vol. 1. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press.
Kahn, Lily. 2015. A Grammar of the Eastern European Hasidic Hebrew Tale [Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 77]. Leiden: Brill.
Khan, Geoffrey (ed.). 2013. Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vols. 1–3. Leiden: Brill.
Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a new town koine: Children and language change
in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29: 65–115.
Kuzar, Ron. 2002. The simple impersonal construction in texts represented
as colloquial Hebrew. In Speaking Hebrew: Studies in the Spoken Language and in
Linguistic Variation in Israel [Te‘uda: The Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies Research
Series 18], Shlomo Izreʾel (ed), 329–352. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press. (in Hebrew)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics
Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Meir, Irit. 2005. The vulnerability of gender marking in Modern Hebrew
numerals. Balšanut ʿIvrit 55: 31–42. (in Hebrew)
Melnik, Nurit. 2006. A constructional approach to verb-initial constructions
in Modern Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 153–198.
Rabin, Chaim.1985. The continuum of modern literary Hebrew. In The Great Transition: The Recovery of the Lost Centers of Modern
Hebrew Literature, Glenda Abramson & Tudor Parfitt (eds), 11–25. Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Ravid, Dorit. 1995a. Neutralization of gender distinctions in Modern Hebrew
numerals. Language Variation and Change 7: 79–100.
. 1995b. The acquisition and processing of inflected prepositions:
Psycholinguistic principles. In Hadassah Kantor jubilee book, Ora (Rodrigue) Schwarzwald & Yitzhak Shlesinger (eds), 184–195. Ramat-Gan: Xen. (in Hebrew)
Reshef, Yael. 2013. ‘The language that follows speech will not be the same as
the one that preceded it’: Spoken Hebrew in the pre-state
period. Journal of Jewish Studies 64: 157–186.
. 2016. Written Hebrew of the revival generation as a distinct
phase in the evolution of Modern Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies LXI: 187–213.
Sharvit, Shimon. 1995. The cardinal number in Rabbinic Hebrew: The weakening of
gender correlation. In Studies in Hebrew Language [Te‘uda: The Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies Research
Series 9], Aharon Dotan (ed.), 49–63. (in Hebrew)
Shatil, Nimrod. 2014. Developments in Contemporary Hebrew. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language. (in Hebrew)
Shulman, Ahuvah. 2001. Imperative and second person indicative forms in Biblical
Hebrew prose. Hebrew Studies 42: 271–287.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Reshef, Yael
2020. Historical overview of Modern Hebrew. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 27 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
