In:The Determinants of Diachronic Stability
Edited by Anne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert and Melissa Farasyn
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 254] 2019
► pp. 245–262
Chapter 10A variational theory of specialization in acquisition and diachrony
Published online: 20 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.254.10wal
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.254.10wal
Abstract
This article presents an empirical case study in the diachronic specialization of morphosyntactic forms for different syntactic contexts, and uses it to develop a theory of variational specialization. This theory links specialization in diachrony to specialization in language acquisition, sociolinguistic coordination in a speech community, and a general understanding of evolutionary dynamics. The case study illustrates these relationships with the specialization of melted and molten in Early Modern English, and tests the hypothesis that even diachronic specialization in a lexical domain will not take the same trajectory for different speakers, but that the community will nevertheless coordinate on a direction of specialization given multiple generations. In doing so, it answers a question referred to as Yang’s Paradox: how can we reconcile diachronic results showing that specialization is slow, with experimental results on acquisition showing that it’s fast? The study ultimately shows that specialization in a speech community is orders of magnitude slower than specialization for an individual child in an experimental setting, due to the problem of coordinating the dimension and direction of specialization among many speakers. I also show how Yang’s (2000) variational grammar learning model can be extended to the problem of specialization, and that children plausibly do not play an active role in specializing linguistic forms: they only need to identify potential contexts that the forms could specialize for, and the learning analog of natural selection does the rest.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Variational specialization
- 2.1A General Principle of Contrast
- 2.2Yang’s paradox
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Choice of phenomenon
- 3.2Study design
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (23)
Bailey, Laura, Wallenberg, Joel C. & van der Wurff, Wim. 2012. Embedded yes/no questions: reanalysis and replacement. Paper presented at Presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (LAGB), University of Salford.
Baker, Mark. 2008. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, Walker, Steven, Bojesen Christensen, Rune Haubo, Singmann, Henrik, Dai, Bin, Grothendieck, Gabor, Green, Peter & Maintainer Ben Bolker. 2014. Package ‘lme4’. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Bion, Ricardo A. H., Borovsky, Arielle & Fernald, Anne. 2013. Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30 months. Cognition 126: 39–53.
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The Principle of Contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, The 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Brian MacWhinney (ed.), 1–33. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ecay, Aaron. 2015. The Penn-York Computer-annotated Corpus of a Large amount of English based on the TCP (PYCCLE-TCP). Public release 1. <[URL]>
Fruehwald, Josef & Wallenberg, Joel C. 2013. Optionality is stable variation is competing grammars. Presented at 25th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Formal Ways of Analyzing Variation (FWAV) Workshop.
In preparation. Optionality is stable variation is competing grammars.
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English, release 3. Size 1.8 Million Words.
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.
Kroch, Anthony S., Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2010. Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. Size 950000 words.
Kroch, Anthony S. & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English. CD-ROM. 2nd edn. Size 1.3 million words.
Larson, Richard K. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3: 217–264.
Markman, Ellen M. & Wachtel, Gwyn F.. 1988. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20:121–157.
Moran, Patrick Alfred Pierce. 1958. Random processes in genetics. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 54: 60–71.
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. <[URL]>
Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York NY: Springer. <[URL]>
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Zimmermann, Richard
2024. How fear developed from an object to a subject experiencer verb. Journal of Historical Linguistics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
