Cover not available

In:Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 97–109

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6
On gender and number

A psycholinguistic review

 | Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.06lor
Abstract
In the theory of agreement developed by Chomsky (2000, 2001) φ features are undifferentiated, they are organized in a bundle of features, despite the intrinsically different information that each of them carries. However, while person is found to have an autonomous status in many psycholinguistic studies, number and gender show contrasting results: some studies show a crucial difference in the processing of number and gender, others, mainly ERP, do not. We will review the different psycholinguistic findings and we will propose that number and gender simply denote different nominal classes. The difference found in some experiments for number and gender maybe linked to when the feature is made available in the comprehension of the sentence (early/late cues).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the Feature Strength Hypothesis: Number over gender
  • 3.Inflectional noun class morphology
  • 4.Possible explanations for the different status of number and gender in comprehension tasks
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Acuña Fariña, Carlos. 2008. The linguistics and psycholinguistics of agreement: A tutorial overview. Lingua 119: 389–424.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arosio, Flavia, Adani, Flavia & Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2009. Processing grammatical features by Italian children. In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, Jose Maria Brucart, Anna Gavarrò & Jaume Sola (eds), 138–155. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barber, Horacio & Manuel Carreiras. 2005. Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(1): 137–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barber, Horacio, Salillas, Elena & Carreiras, Manuel. 2004. Gender or genders agreement? In On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension; Eye-tracking, ERP and Beyond, Manuel Carreiras & Charles Clifton (eds), Psychology Press, 309–327, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carminati, Maria. 2005. Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 115: 259–285.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness, and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Girard, Raphaël, Mudzingwa, Raphaël, & Martina Wiltschko. 2014. The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences 43: 18–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vincenzi, Marica. 1999. Differences between the morphology of gender and number: Evidence from establishing coreferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 537–553.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Domenico, Elisa & De Vincenzi, Marica. 1995. Gender and number in the retrieval of pronoun antecedents: Differences in use and representation. In Actes du deuxième colloque Langues et grammaire, Lea Nash, George Tsoulas & Anne Zribi-Herts (eds), 95–109, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2015. N Class and its interpretation: The neuter in central Italian varieties and its implications. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages, 41–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gow, David W. & Gordon, Peter C. 1995. Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21(2): 344–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Universals of language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Universals of Human Language, Joseph H., Greenberg (ed), 73–113. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Rotondi, Irene, Vernice, Mirta & Franck, Julie. 2012. The processing of center embedded relative clauses in French and Italian. Poster at AMLaP, Riva del Garda, Italy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunter, Thomas C., Friederici, Angela D. & Schriefers, Herbert. 2000. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 556–568.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, Peter & Brown, Collin M. 1999. Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28(6): 715–728.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Richard & Vasishthb, Shravan. 2005. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29: 375–419.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mancini, Simona, Molinaro, Nicola, Rizzi, Luigi & Carreiras, Manuel. 2011. A person is not a number: Discourse involvement in subject-verb agreement computation. Brain Research 1410: 64–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, 3 Vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Studies in Romance and Albanian Varieties. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Case as denotation: Variation in Romance. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata XXXIX(3): 409– 438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. From Latin to Romance: Case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus 26(2): 217–248.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinaro, Nicola, Vespignani, Francesco, & Job, Remo. 2008. A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations. Brain Research 1228: 161–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, Dillon, Brian, Malhotra, Shiti & Collin Phillips. 2007. The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research 1164: 81–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osterhout, Lee & Linda A. Mobley. 1995. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 739–773.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Hutchins, Sean. 2004. Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30(2): 431–450.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Hartsuiker, Robert, Jarema, Gonia & Herman H. J. Kolk. 1996. One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes 11: 407–442.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Franco, Ludovico & Lorusso, Paolo. 2017. Digging-in effects in Italian relative clauses, talk presented at Experimental psycholinguistic conference, Minorca 28 June.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Pienie. 1989. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition 32: 25–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zawiszewski, Adam, Santesteban, Mikel & Laka, Itziar. 2016. Phi-features reloaded: An ERP study on person and number agreement processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 37: 601–626.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lorusso, Paolo
2025. Agreement features in the nominal domain as classifiers: theoretical and experimental perspectives. Frontiers in Language Sciences 4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue