Cover not available

In:Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 331341

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (23)
References
Ahn, S. 1998. An Introduction to Korean Phonology. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research, W. Strange (ed.), 167–200. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C. & Mehler, J. 1999. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology-human Perception and Performance 25(6): 1568–1578.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Speech perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research, W. Strange (ed.), 233–277. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, P. & Jang, S. 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25, 437–470.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hisagi, M. 2007. Perception of Japanese Temporally-cued Phonetic Contrasts by Japanese and American English Listeners: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Measures. PhD dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. L. & Park, S. -G. 1997. Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics 25: 343–370.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 2004. Cross-linguistic perceptual differences emerge from the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Coarticulation in Speech Production and Perception, A. Agwuele, W. Warren & S. -H. Park (eds.) 26–41. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, Y. 2003. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20: 219–273.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. A corpus-based study of positional variation in Seoul Korean vowels. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N. & Lindblom, B. 1992. Linguistic experiences alter phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606–608.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, C. 1999. Eoneo (language). Seoul: Tapchulpansa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2010. Perception and production of English front vowels by Korean speakers. Journal of Korean Society of Speech Sciences 2(1): 51–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitsuya, T., MacDonald, E. N., Purcell, D. W. & Munhall, K. G. 2010. A cross-language study of compensatory response to formant-shifted feedback. Paper presented at The Second Language Studies – Acquisition, Learning, Education and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S. 2005. A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, M. Ettlinger, N. Fleischer & M. Park-Doob (eds.), 341–352. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, M. J. Solé, D. Recasens & J. Romero (eds.), 367–370. Adelaide: Causal Productions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vedelin, I., & Nakamura, K. (2008). On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: Experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology 25: 129–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9: 289–328.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., & Nishi, K. 2001. Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 1691–1704.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szpyra-Kozłowska J. & Radomski, M. 2015. Perception versus spelling in loanword adaptation from English into Polish: The case of /æ/ and /ɪ/. Paper presented at Approaches to Phonetics and Phonology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H. & Flege, J. 2005. A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics 33: 263–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vance, T. 2008. The Sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, T., Kang, Y., Han, S., Maeng, H., Lee, J., & Kim, K. 2015. A corpus-based approach to dialectal variation in Korean vowels. Proceedings of ICPhS 2015.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue