In:Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 229–251
Chapter 11An experimental study of children’s comprehension of lexical and productive causatives in Japanese
Published online: 12 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.12yam
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.12yam
This article experimentally investigates children’s comprehension of causative constructions in Japanese and compares the acquisition of lexical and productive causatives in Japanese. The results of our experiments show that children correctly comprehend direct causative meanings of lexical causative verbs quite early, but that they often misinterpret indirect causative meanings of productive causatives, which suggests that the acquisition of indirect causative meanings of productive causatives is delayed. We suggest the delay of the acquisition of productive causatives is due to children’s misplacement of the causative morpheme sase in the structure of productive causatives, which is compatible with the analysis of children’s natural speech data in Murasugi and Hashimoto (2004) and Murasugi, Hashimoto and Fuji (2007).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous acquisition studies of causatives in Japanese
- 2.1 Murasugi & Hashimoto 2004 and Murasugi, Hashimoto & Fuji 2007
- 2.2 Okabe (2008)
- 3.Experiments
- 3.1Experiment 1
- 3.1.1Method
- 3.1.2Results of Experiment 1
- 3.2Experiment 2
- 3.2.1Picture selection task
- 3.2.1.1Method
- 3.2.1.2Results of the picture selection task
- 3.2.2Truth value judgment task
- 3.2.2.1Method
- 3.2.2.2Results of the truth value judgment task
- 3.2.1Picture selection task
- 3.1Experiment 1
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgement Notes References
References (26)
De Villiers, J. & Roeper, T. 1996. Questions after stories: On supplying context and eliminating it as a variable. In Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax, D. McDaniel, C. McKee & H. S. Cairns (eds), 163–187. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2008. On the causative construction. In The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (eds), 22–53. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kuczaj, S. 1977. The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16(5): 589–600.
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1965a. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Matsumoto, Y. 2000. On the crosslinguistic parameterization of causative predicates: Implications from Japanese and other languages. In Argument Realization, M. Butt & T. H. King (eds), 135–169. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2012. Blocking and causatives revisited: Unexpected competition across derivations. In Case, Argument Structure, and Word Order, 195–216. Oxford: Routledge.
Murasugi, K. & Hashimoto, T. 2004. Three pieces of acquisition evidence for the v-VP frame. Nanzan Linguistics 1: 1–19.
Murasugi, K., Hashimoto, T. & Fuji, C. 2007. VP-shell analysis for the acquisition of Japanese intransitives verbs, transitive verbs, and causatives. Linguistics 45: 615–651.
Noji, J. 1974–1977. Youji no Gengoseikatsu no Jittai I-IV (Language use in childhood). Tokyo: Bunka Hyoron Shuppan.
Okabe, R. 2008. Child Causatives: Acquisition of Bi-clausal Structures in Japanese. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
1976. The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions, [Syntax and Semantics 6] M. Shibatani (ed.), 1–142. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Shibatani, M. & Chung, S. Y. 2001. Japanese and Korean causatives revisited. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 3: 112–135, Kobe University.
Shibatani, M. & Pardeshi, P. 2002. The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, M. Shibatani (ed.), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hein, Johannes, Imke Driemel, Fabienne Martin, Yining Nie & Artemis Alexiadou
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
