Cover not available

In:Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 207–226

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
Possessive nominal phrases in Lamaholot

 | Ibaraki University
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.11nis
This paper analyzes the synchrony and diachrony of possessive noun phrases in Lamaholot (Austronesian). On the assumption that the clause architecture and the nominal architecture are parallel, the loss of verb movement at the clausal level (Aldridge 2010) is argued to be equivalent to the loss of movement of NP at the nominal level. This captures the possessor – possessed order in languages in eastern Indonesia (including Lamaholot), as opposed to the possessed – possessor order in western Indonesia. Lamaholot also has the possessed – possessor order, and this involves focus movement of NP. The complementary distribution of a genitive pronoun and a nominal suffix is accounted for by contextual allomorphy. As driving force of word order change, an internal factor (within Austronesian) and an external factor (contact with Papuan languages) are suggested.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The Austronesian word order
  • 2.The Lamaholot language and its clausal and nominal architectures
  • 3.Prenominal possessors
  • 4.Postnominal possessors, focus movement, and contextual allomorphy
  • 5.Diachrony and the role of language contact
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aldridge, E. 2010. Directionality in word order change in Austronesian languages. In Continuity and Change in Grammar, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 159] A. Breitbarth, C. Lucas, S. Watts & D. Willis (eds.), 169–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. 2005. Possessors and (in)definiteness. Lingua 115: 787–819.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. & Roberts, I. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 169–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blust, R. 1993. Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics 32: 241–293.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The Austronesian languages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, G. L. 1995. Compendium of the World’s Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, S. 2008. Indonesian clause structure from an Austronesian perspective. Lingua 118(10): 1554–1582.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, G. 1994. On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, G. Cinque, J. Koster, J. -Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi & R. Zanuttini (eds.), 85–110. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dardjowidjojo, S. 1978. Sentence Patterns of Indonesian. Honolulu HI: The University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donohue, M. 2005. Word order in New Guinea: dispelling a myth. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2): 527–536.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Word order in Austronesian from north to south and west to east. Linguistic Typology 11(2): 349–391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (eds.), 110–181. London: Routledge/Curzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudak, T. J. 1990. Thai. In The World’s Major Languages, B. Comrie (ed.) 757–775. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klamer, M. 1998. A Grammar of Kambera. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Typical features of Austronesian languages in central/eastern Indonesia. Oceanic Linguistics 41: 363–383.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. A Grammar of Teiwa. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. A Short Grammar of Alorese(Austronesian). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Papuan-Austronesian language contact: Alorese from an areal perspective. In Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st century [Language Documentation & Conservation. Special Publication No. 5], N. Evans & M. Klamer (eds.), 72–108. < [URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forthcoming From Lamaholot to Alorese: Simplification without shift. In Austronesian Undressed: How and Why Languages Become Isolating, D. Gil, J. McWhorter & S. Paauw (eds.).
Klamer, M., Reesink, G. & van Staden, M. 2008. East Nusantara as a linguistic area. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, [Studies in Language Companion Series 90] P. Muysken (ed.), 95–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, J., Ross, M. & Crowley, T. 2002. Typological overview. In The Oceanic Languages, J. Lynch, M. Ross & T. Crowley (eds.), 34–53. London: Routledge/Curzon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your lexicon., In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistic Colloquium University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagaya, N. 2011. The Lamaholot Language of Eastern Indonesia. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. -H. 1990. Vietnamese. In The World’s Major Languages, B. Comrie (ed.), 777–796. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiyama, K. & Kelen, H. 2007. A Grammar of Lamaholot, Eastern Indonesia: The Morphology and Syntax of the Lewoingu Dialect. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiyama, K. 2011. Conjunctive agreement in Lamaholot. Journal of Linguistics 47: 381–405.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tryon, D. T. (ed.). 1995. Comparative Austronesian Dictionary, Part I: Fascicle 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. 1983/84. The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3: 89–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, A. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax . In R. S. Kayne & G. Cinque (eds.), 806–838. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue