Cover not available

In:The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 203–226

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Two kinds of VERUM distinguished by aspect choice in Russian

 | University of Leipzig
Published online: 30 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.07mue
Abstract
The paper proposes a direct tie between the existential use of imperfective aspect in Russian and the expression of VERUM. It is argued that the kind of VERUM expressed in these cases differs from the kind of VERUM that utterances based on perfective verb forms convey. In the former cases the speaker invites the addressee to infer the truth of a generic proposition, whereas in the latter cases she invites the addressee to infer the truth of an episodic proposition. It is also shown that in the imperfective cases VERUM may be indicated by verum focus, whereas for perfective aspect to express VERUM verum focus is mandatory.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On aspect choice in Russian
  • 3.Varieties of “completed imperfectives”
  • 4.The semantics and pragmatics of perfective and imperfective aspect
  • 5.What is relevant instead of the target state?
  • 6.What is relevant instead of the target state?
  • 7.Existential imperfectives express VERUM
  • 8.(More or less) open issues
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (59)
References
Alvestad, Silje. 2013. Beware of Fakes! Fake Imperfectives in the Slavic Imperative. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breu, Walter. 2009. Verbale Kategorien: Aspekt und Aktionsart. In Die slavischen Sprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Band 1, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 209–225. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory. 1980. Reference to Kinds in English. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Truth conditions of generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In The Generic Book, Gregory Carlson & Francis Pelletier (eds), 224–237. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In The Generic Book, Gregory Carlson & Francis Pelletier (eds), 176–223. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen. 2000. Parameters of Slavic Aspect. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forsyth, James. 1970. A Grammar of Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gasparov, Boris. 1990. Notes on the ’metaphysics’ of Russian aspect. In Verbal Aspect in Discourse, Nils Thelin (ed.), 191–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glovinskaja, Marina J. 1982. Semantičeskie tipy vidovych protivopostavlenij russkogo glagola. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grønn, Atle. 2001. The semantics of the “experiential imperfective” in a unified account of the imperfective in Russian. Scando-Slavica 47(1): 81–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The Semantics and Pragmatics of the Russian Factual Imperfective. Oslo: Acta Humaniora.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. An amazing come-back: A counterfactual imperfective in Russian. Scando-Slavica 54(1): 5–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel & Castroviejo Miró, Elena. 2011. The dimensions of VERUM. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 143–165. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.. 1988. VERUM-Fokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5: 1-7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe. 1995. Funktionale Kategorien im russischen Satz. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slawistik aus Deutschland und Österreich, II: JungslawistInnen-Treffen Leipzig 1993 [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 37], Uwe Junghanns (ed.), 167–203. Wien: Gesellschaft zur Förderung slawistischer Studien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Informationsstrukturierung in slavischen Sprachen: Zur Rekonstruktion in einem syntax-zentrierten Modell der Grammatik. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe & Zybatow, Gerhild. 2009. Grammatik und Informationsstruktur. In Die slavischen Sprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Band 1, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 684–707. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Syntax and information structure in Russian clauses. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting 1995, Wayles Browne (ed.), 289–319. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71(4): 669–695.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. In Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Aspect, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate. 2012. Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In The Expression of Information Structure, Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds), 1–44. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leinonen, Marja. 1982. Russian Aspect, Temporal’naja lokalizacija, and Definiteness/indefiniteness. Helsinki: Neuvostoliittoinstituutin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2011. Event semantics. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 1, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 802–829. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij. 1948. Vid i leksičeskoe značenie glagola v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke. Izvestija Akademii nauk SSSR, Otdelenie literatury i jazyka 8: 303–316.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1959. Glagol'nyj vid v sovremennom bolgarskom jazyke. In sVoprosy grammatiki bolgarskogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moskva: Akademija nauk SSSR, 157-312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Zur Semantik der Perfektivitätsopposition. Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch 20: 107–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, Grit. 2002. Kontrastierte Konstituenten im Russischen. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Informationsstruktur. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The prosodic pattern of contrastive topic in Russian. In Information Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects, Anita Steube (ed), 241-258. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehlig, Hans Robert. 1991. Ėkzistencial’nye i ėksplikativnye voprosy. Russian Linguistics 15: 117–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Obščefakticeskoe i edinično-faktičeskoe značenija nesoveršennogo vida v russkom jazyke. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta 9(4): 19–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Negation und Verbalaspekt im Russischen. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 77: 229–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 2008. The English resultative perfect and its relationship to the experiential perfect and the simple past tense. Linguistics & Philosophy 31(3): 323–351.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2): 15–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mueller-Reichau, Olav. 2016. Das Rätsel allgemeinfaktischer Interpretationen im Aspektsystem des Russischen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. General-factual Perfectives: On an Asymmetry in Aspect Choice Between Western and Eastern Slavic Languages. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mueller-Reichau, Olav & Gehrke, Berit. 2015. Event kind formation within the VP: Comparing Russian factual imperfectives and German adjectival passives. In Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective, Gerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Maria Yastrebova (eds), 367–382. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V. 1996. Semantičeskie issledovaniia: Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom jazyke, semantika narrativa. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paslawska, Alla & von Stechow, Arnim. 2003. Perfect readings in Russian. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 307–362. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungjan, Vladimir A. 2011. Vvedenie v grammatičeskuju semantiku: Grammatičeskie značenija i grammatičeskie sistemy jazykov mira. Moskva: RGGU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rassudova, Olga P. 1968/1982. Upotreblenie vidov glagola v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo “Russkij jazyk”.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung-hye. 2004. On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5): 609–658.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šatunovskij, Il‘ja B. 2009. Problemy russkogo vida. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskich kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1995. Participal Passive and Aspect in Russian. Utrecht: OTS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šeljakin, Michail. 2008. Kategorija aspektual’nosti russkogo glagola. Moskva: LKI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonnenhauser, Barbara. 2006. Yet there’s method in it. Semantics, pragmatics, and the Interpretation of the Russian Imperfective Aspect. Munich: Sagner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stunová, Anna. 1991. In defense of language-specific invariant meanings of aspect in Russian and Czech. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 16: 291–313.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Švedova, Natalija J. 1980. Russkaja grammatika, 2: Sintaksis. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, Oscar. 1977. The mystery of the imperfective-completive. The Slavic and East European Journal 21(4): 517–525.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2011. Severing perfectivity from the verb. Scando-Slavica 57(2): 216–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Severing imperfectivity from the verb. In Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective, Gerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Maria Yastrebova (eds), 465–494. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. In Linguistics in Philosophy, Zeno Vendler (ed.), 97–121. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2008. Zur innerslavischen Variation bei der Aspektwahl und der Gewichtung ihrer Faktoren. In Deutsche Beiträge zum 14. Internationalen Slavistenkongreß, Ohrid 2008, Karl Gutschmidt, Ulrike Jekutsch, Sebastian Kempgen & Ludger Udolph (eds), 383–409. Munich: Sagner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Šmelev, Aleksej D. 1997. Lekcii po russkoj aspektologii. Munich: Otto Sager.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zybatow, Gerhild. 1999. Informationsstruktur im Russischen. In Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung, Monika Doherty (ed.), 61–89. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zybatow, Gerhild & Mehlhorn, Grit. 2000. Experimental evidence for focus structure in Russian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Philadelphia Meeting 1999, Tracy King & Irina Sekerina (eds), 414–434. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue