In:The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 109–128
Veridicality and sets of alternative worlds
On embedded interrogatives and the complementizers that and if
Published online: 30 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.04ohl
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.04ohl
Abstract
This paper explores three related phenomena. First, not all embedded formal interrogatives (i.e. clauses introduced by if or whether) have the function of an indirect question. Second, the complementizers if and that may occur in identical syntactic contexts. Third, if-clauses may be licensed by certain (discourse) semantic factors, like negation, modality, and also verum focus, where otherwise that-clauses are preferred. The approach taken is based on epistemic logic, especially on the notion of relativized veridicality, the notion of possible worlds and the formal semantics of the complementizers that and if.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Embedding clause types
- 2.1The use of that and if
- 2.2Interrogative clauses as syntactic objects
- 2.3Polarity and relativized veridicality
- 2.4Scope of the nonveridical operation
- 3. That vs. if: What do the complementizers denote?
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (31)
Adger, David & Quer, Joseph. 2001. The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 77(1): 107–133.
Altmann, Hans. 1987. Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen. In Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, Jörg Meibauer (ed.), 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bayer, Josef. 2004. Decomposing the left periphery. Dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 59–95. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1980. Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In Speech Act Theorie and Pragmatics, John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, Manfred Bierwisch (eds), 1-35. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Yes/no questions are not alternative questions. In Questions, Henry Hiz (ed.), 87–105. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Eckardt, Regine. 2007. The syntax and pragmatics of embedded yes/no questions. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 447–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. Inquisitive assertions and nonveridicality. In The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of Phi, ?Phi, and Possibly Phi. A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof and Frank Veltman, Maria Aloni, Michael Franke & Floris Roelofsen (eds), 115–126. Amsterdam: ILLC Publications.
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2): 175–233.
Hamblin, Charles L. 1976. Questions in Montague English. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed)., 247–259. New York NY: Academic Press.
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1994. The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30(2): 411–439.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1978. Semantik der Rede. Kontexttheorie – Modalwörter – Konditionalsätze. Königstein im Taunus: Scriptor.
Krifka, Manfred. 2011. Questions. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning Vol. 2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1742–1758. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lohnstein, Horst. 2005. Sentence connection as quantificational structure. In Event Arguments. Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 113–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2016. Verum focus. In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 290–313. Oxford: OUP.
Meibauer, Jörg, Altmann, Hans & Steinbach, Markus. 2013. Kontroversen in der Forschung zu Satztypen und Satzmodus. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Hans Altmann & Markus Steinbach (eds), 1–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Montague, Richard. 1969[1974]. On the nature of certain philosophical entities. In Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), 148–187. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Öhl, Peter. 2007. Unselected embedded interrogatives in German and English: S-Selection as dependency formation. Linguistische Berichte 212: 403–437.
. 2009. Sprachwandel und kognitive Ökonomie: Zur Grammatikalisierung und Substitution von Satzkonnektoren. Linguistische Berichte 220: 393–438.
. 2017. Zur Akzeptanz der Einbettung von ob-Sätzen unter veridischen Prädikaten. Eine Hypothese bezogen auf epistemische Weltenmodelle – mit einem Seitenblick auf das Persische. In Deutsch als Bindeglied zwischen Inlands- und Auslandsgermanistik. Beiträge zu den 23. GeSuS-Linguistik-Tagen in Sankt Petersburg, 22.–24. Juni 2015, Sergej Nefedov, Ljubov Grigorieva & Bettina Bock (eds), 385–394. Hamburg: Kovač.
. 2018. Zum Denotat von Subjunktionen. In Sprachen verbinden. Beiträge der 24. Linguistik- und Literaturtage, Brno/Tschechien, 2016, Vera Janikova, Alice Brychová, Jana Veličková & Roland Wagner (eds), 107–118. Hamburg: Kovač.
Reis, Marga. 1999. On sentence types in German: An enquiry into the relationship between grammar and pragmatics. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 4: 195–236.
Schwabe, Kerstin. 2016a. Irritierende ob-Sätze. Paper presented at Wuppertaler Linguistisches Forum, 28 Januar.
. 2016b. Towards a typology of German ob-interrogatives embedding predicates. Paper presented at SLE 2016, University of Naples, 1 September.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Zuchewicz, Karolina
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
