Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (31)
References
Adger, David & Quer, Joseph. 2001. The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 77(1): 107–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, Hans. 1987. Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen. In Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, Jörg Meibauer (ed.), 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2004. Decomposing the left periphery. Dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 59–95. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1980. Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In Speech Act Theorie and Pragmatics, John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, Manfred Bierwisch (eds), 1-35. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Yes/no questions are not alternative questions. In Questions, Henry Hiz (ed.), 87–105. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borchert, Donald M. 2006. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7. Detroit MI: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2007. The syntax and pragmatics of embedded yes/no questions. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 447–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Inquisitive assertions and nonveridicality. In The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of Phi, ?Phi, and Possibly Phi. A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof and Frank Veltman, Maria Aloni, Michael Franke & Floris Roelofsen (eds), 115–126. Amsterdam: ILLC Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Janet. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 279–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2): 175–233.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1976. Questions in Montague English. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed)., 247–259. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. 1988. Vorwort und Nachwort zu Verumfokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5(1): 1–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1994. The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30(2): 411–439.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 3–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1978. Semantik der Rede. Kontexttheorie – Modalwörter – Konditionalsätze. Königstein im Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2011. Questions. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning Vol. 2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1742–1758. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahiri, Utpal. 2002. Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst. 2005. Sentence connection as quantificational structure. In Event Arguments. Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 113–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. On clause types and sentential force. Linguistische Berichte 209: 63–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Verum focus. In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 290–313. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg, Altmann, Hans & Steinbach, Markus. 2013. Kontroversen in der Forschung zu Satztypen und Satzmodus. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Hans Altmann & Markus Steinbach (eds), 1–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1969[1974]. On the nature of certain philosophical entities. In Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), 148–187. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Öhl, Peter. 2007. Unselected embedded interrogatives in German and English: S-Selection as dependency formation. Linguistische Berichte 212: 403–437.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Sprachwandel und kognitive Ökonomie: Zur Grammatikalisierung und Substitution von Satzkonnektoren. Linguistische Berichte 220: 393–438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Zur Akzeptanz der Einbettung von ob-Sätzen unter veridischen Prädikaten. Eine Hypothese bezogen auf epistemische Weltenmodelle – mit einem Seitenblick auf das Persische. In Deutsch als Bindeglied zwischen Inlands- und Auslandsgermanistik. Beiträge zu den 23. GeSuS-Linguistik-Tagen in Sankt Petersburg, 22.–24. Juni 2015, Sergej Nefedov, Ljubov Grigorieva & Bettina Bock (eds), 385–394. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Zum Denotat von Subjunktionen. In Sprachen verbinden. Beiträge der 24. Linguistik- und Literaturtage, Brno/Tschechien, 2016, Vera Janikova, Alice Brychová, Jana Veličková & Roland Wagner (eds), 107–118. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1999. On sentence types in German: An enquiry into the relationship between grammar and pragmatics. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 4: 195–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwabe, Kerstin. 2016a. Irritierende ob-Sätze. Paper presented at Wuppertaler Linguistisches Forum, 28 Januar.
. 2016b. Towards a typology of German ob-interrogatives embedding predicates. Paper presented at SLE 2016, University of Naples, 1 September.
Spector, Benjamin & Egré, Paul. 2015. A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: An answer, not necessarily the answer. Synthese 192(6): 1729–1784.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Zuchewicz, Karolina
2024. Zu scheinbar überraschenden Einbettungskonstellationen im Polnischen, die sich als doch nicht so überraschend erweisen. In Bulletin der deutschen Slavistik 2024 [Bulletin der deutschen Slavistik, ],  pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Schwabe, Kerstin
2019. Misfits: On Unexpected German Ob-Predicates. In Language, Logic, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11456],  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue