Cover not available

In:The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 55–88

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Verum focus, sentence mood, and contrast

 | University of Wuppertal
Published online: 30 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.02loh
Abstract
Verum focus is a phenomenon which results from accentuation of a specific component (finite verb, complementizer, relative or wh-element) in the left peripheral position of a clause. It invokes the effect of emphasizing the expression of truth of a proposition as Höhle (1988; 1992), who coined the term, characterized the phenomenon. In German, verum focus typically appears in the left periphery in main as well as in embedded clauses. The distribution of the accent at the surface is driven by rather sophisticated conditions which relate the syntactic surface position of the accent to its PF and LF effects in systematic ways.
The close connection of the phenomenon with the concepts of truth, contrast, and sentential force calls for a theory which interrelates these notions. This leads to a perspective that connects verum focus to the part of the sentence that spells out the intention (not the intension) of the sentence meaning: sentence mood. The proposed line of reasoning intends to promote the view that verum focus can be derived from the systematic interaction of sentence mood with the regular properties of focus assignment. Since focus assignment relates accent and contrast, ‘truth’ is achieved by verum focus, if the sentence mood function is fulfilled.
Article outline
  • 1.The phenomenon
  • 2.Höhle’s theoretical reconstructions
    • 2.1Illocution type operator analysis
    • 2.2VERUM as a truth predicate
      • 2.2.1Segmental localization of VERUM
      • 2.2.2Non-segmental localization of VERUM
    • 3.Sentential force and sentence mood
  • 4.Verum focus in discourse situations
  • 5.Verum focus in embedded clauses
    • 5.1Verum focus in the left periphery
    • 5.2Verum effects at the right periphery
  • 6.Deriving the intuition about ‘truth’
  • 7.The sentence mood theory of verum focus
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Altmann, Hans. 1987. Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen. In Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, Jörg Meibauer (ed.), 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Satzmodus. In Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 1006–1029. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antomo, Mailin. 2012. Abhängige Sätze in einem fragebasierten Diskursmodell. PhD dissertation, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. <[URL]> (14 December 2017).
Aristoteles. 2007. Metaphysik. Schriften zur Ersten Philosophie. Übersetzt und herausgegeben von Franz F. Schwarz. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2010. What is verb second? <[URL]> (16 June 2017).
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1980. Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, John F. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Bierwisch (eds), 1–35. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik. 2012. Faktizität, Wahrheit, Erwünschtheit: Negation, Negationsfokus und „Verum“-Fokus im Deutschen. In Lohnstein & Blühdorn (eds), 137–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik & Lohnstein, Horst. 2012. Verumfokus im Deutschen: Versuch einer Synthese. In Lohnstein & Blühdorn (eds), 171–261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt, Margareta, Reis, Marga, Rosengren, Inger & Zimmermann, Ilse. 1992. Satztyp, Satzmodus und Illokution. In Satz und Illokution I, Inger Rosengren (ed.), 1–90. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 2000. A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In Epistemology: An Anthology, Ernest Sosa & Jaegwon Kim (eds), 154–163. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka & Bruce, Kim. 2010. On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27 (1): 81–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1919[1956]. The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind 65(259): 289–311.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1919[1986]. Der Gedanke – Eine logische Untersuchung. In Logische Untersuchungen, 3rd edn, 30–53. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Nachgelassene Schriften und wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Schriften zur Logik und Sprachphilosophie. Aus dem Nachlass, 4th edn. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärtner, Hans Martin. 2001. Are there V2 relative clauses in German? The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3(2): 97–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2): 175–233.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2010. Betonte Modalpartikeln und Verumfokus. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Elke Hentschel & Theo Harden (eds), 119–138. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Wahrheitstheorien. In Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag, Helmut Fahrenbach (ed.), 211–265. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1976. Questions in Montague English. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed.), 247–259. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1935. On the logical positivists’ theory of truth. Analysis 2(4): 49–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1986. The semantics of questions. In Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Shalom Lappin (ed.), 361–383. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. 1982. Explikationen für “normale Betonung” und “normale Wortstellung”. In Satzglieder im Deutschen: Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Werner Abraham (ed.), 75–153. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. Vorwort und Nachwort zu Verumfokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5(1): 1–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 3–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3–4): 243–276.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David K. 1970. General semantics. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed.), 1–50. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst. 2000. Satzmodus – kompositionell: Zur Parametrisierung der Modusphrase im Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. On clause types and sentential force. Linguistische Berichte 209: 63–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Verumfokus – Satzmodus – Wahrheit. In Lohnstein & Blühdorn (eds), 31–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Verum Focus. In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 290–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst & Stommel, Hildegard. 2009. Verum focus and phases. Linguistic Analysis (Special Issue. Phase Edge Investigations), 35 (1–4): 109–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst & Blühdorn, Hardarik (eds). 2012. Wahrheit – Fokus – Negation. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1997. Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Sprache im Fokus: Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, Christa Dürscheid, Karl-Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds), 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga & Rosengren, Inger. 1992. What do Wh-imperatives tell us about Wh-movement. Linguistic Theory and Natural Language 10(1): 79–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 75–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold & Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy F. Shopen (ed.), 155–196. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenius, Erik. 1967. Mood and language game. Synthese 17(1): 254–274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stommel, Hildegard. 2011. Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. Marburg: Tectum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan. 2012. Negation der Negation. In Lohnstein & Blühdorn (eds), 105–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1944. Die semantische Konzeption der Wahrheit und die Grundlagen der Semantik. In Wahrheitstheorien, Gunnar Skirbekk (ed.), 140–188. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006a. On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3): 257–306.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Replies to the Comments by Gärtner, Plunze and Zimmermann, Portner, Potts, Reis, and Zaefferer. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3): 377–410.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 1979. Sprechakttypen in einer Montague-Grammatik: Ein modelltheoretischer Ansatz zur Behandlung illokutionärer Rollen. In Sprechakttheorie und Semantik, Günther Grewendorf (ed.), 386–417. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2025. A guide to construct non-canonical wh-questions. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Mitkovska, Liljana, Eleni Bužarovska & Fevzudina Saračević
2024. The role of biased polar question particles in discourse: the case of Macedonian zar and neli . Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Zimmerling, Anton V.
2023. Really: syntactics without semiotics?. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 14:3 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Matthewson, Lisa
2021. Verum in Gitksan. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue