Cover not available

In:Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages:
Edited by Annika Hübl and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247] 2018
► pp. 119–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

A centering theoretic account for the changing usage of anaphoric expressions in the history of German

 | Saarland University
Published online: 25 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.247.06spe
The Centering status of a referent and the coherence relation of the discourse unit in which the referent is used are potential factors for anaphor resolution. In Old High German, as exemplified with Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch, there is a strong tendency for this generalisation – Backward looking centers in Continue relations tend to be realised by personal pronouns, in Retain and Shift relations, they tend to be realised by demonstrative pronouns – but it is far from categorical. There are even blatant violations of generalizations that hold for Modern German, so the importance of Centering as a factor is higher today than in Old High German. In Early New High German of the 14th century, anaphora resolution was sensitive to Centering. The hierarchical structure of a text played a bigger role, as adjacency was defined not strictly linearly, but with respect to discourse units on the same hierarchical level.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Aims of this paper
    • 1.2Centering theory
  • 2.Anaphoric expressions in modern German from a centering perspective
  • 3.Old High German – does centering play a role for the choice of anaphoric expressions?
  • 4.Later periods
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Abraham, W. 2002. Pronomina im Diskurs: Deutsche Personal- und Demonstrativpronomina unter Zentrierungsperspektive. Grammatische Überlegungen zu einer Teiltheorie der Textkohärenz. Sprachwissenschaft 27: 447–491.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007a. Discourse binding. DPs and pronouns in German, Dutch, and English. In Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89], E. Stark, E. Leiss & W. Abraham (eds), 21–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007b. The discourse-functional crystallization of the historically original demonstrative. In Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89], 241–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahrenholz, B. 2007. Verweise mit Demonstrativa im gesprochenen Deutsch. Grammatik, Zweitspracherwerb und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, H. 1981. Formen der Herausstellung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing NP antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Text representation, T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord & W. Spooren (eds), 29–87. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Axel, K. & Weiß, H. 2011. Pro-drop in the history of German. From Old High German to the modern dialects. In Null Pronouns, P. Gallmann & M. Wratil (eds), 21–51. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bethke, I. 1990. Der, die, das als Pronomen. München: Judicium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosch, P. 2012. Parameters of anaphoric reference for German personal and demonstrative pronouns. Talk given at 34th DGfS Annual Meeting, Frankfurt, March 8, 2012.
Bosch, P., Rozario, T. & Zhao, Y. 2003. Demonstrative pronouns and personal pronouns. German der vs. er. Proceedings of the EACL 2003, Budapest.
Bosch, P., Katz, G. & Umbach, C. 2007. The non-subject bias of German demonstrative pronouns. In Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (eds), 145–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosch, P. & Umbach C. 2007. Reference determination for demonstrative pronouns. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 48: 39–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. & Ventola, E. (eds). 1999. Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 63]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. 1996. Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Vol. II, H. Thráinsson, S. D. Epstein & S. Peter (eds), 21–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiarcos, C., Claus, B. & Grabski, M. 2011. Introduction: Salience in linguistics and beyond. In Salience: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on its Functions in Discourse, C. Chiarcos, B. Claus & M. Grabski (eds), 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggenberger, J. 1961. Das Subjektpronomen im Althochdeutschen. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte des deutschen Schrifttums. Grabs: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellert, M. 2010. Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in L1 and L2 German and Dutch. PhD dissertation, MPI Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, B. & Sidner, C. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, B., Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21: 203–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski R. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nübling, D. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrova, S. & Solf, M. 2010. Pronominale Wiederaufnahme im ältesten Deutsch. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen, A. Ziegler & C. Braun (eds), 339–363. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, B. 2011. Animacy, generalized semantic roles, and different object marking. In Case, Word Order, and Prominence. Interacting Cues in Language Production and Comprehension, M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds), 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlachter, E. 2012. Syntax und Informationsstruktur im Althochdeutschen. Untersuchungen am Beispiel der Isidorgruppe. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaer, B. & Frey, W. 2004. ‘Integrated’ and ‘non-integrated’ left-peripheral elements in German and English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: 465–502.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Somers Wicka, K. 2009. From Phonology to Syntax: Pronominal Cliticization in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speyer, A. 2007. Die Bedeutung der Centering Theory für Fragen der Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 83–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speyer, A. 2016. Factors determining the choice of anaphora in Old High German – A survey of zero and personal pronoun usage in Otfrid. In Experimental Perspectives on Anaphora Resolution,A. Holler & K. Suckow (eds), 113–141. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Stark, E., Leiss, E. & Abraham, W. (eds) 2007. Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strube, M. & Hahn, U. 1996. Functional centering. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 270–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turan, Ü.D. 1998. Ranking forward-looking centers in Turkish: Universals and language-specific properties. In Centering Theory in Discourse, M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi & E. F. Prince (eds), 139–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dyke, J. 2012. The role of memory in language and communication. In Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: A Process-oriented Approach, R. Peach & L. Shapiro (eds), 94–120. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K. & Prince, E. F. 1998. Centering in naturally occurring discourse: An overview. In Centering Theory in Discourse, M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi & E. F. Prince (eds), 1–28. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Y. 2003. Parameter zur Bestimmung der Referenz von Demonstrativpronomina in Texten. Versuch einer Analyse mit Hilfe der Centering Theory. BA thesis, Osnabrück.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue