Cover not available

In:On the Syntax of Missing Objects: A study with special reference to English, Polish, and Hungarian
Marta Ruda
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 244] 2017
► pp. 179–192

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 16 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.244.refs
Abels, Klaus. 2001. The Predicate Cleft Construction in Russian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 9, Steven Franks & Michael Yadroff (eds), 1–19. Bloomington, IN: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. & Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. Predicate doubling and parallel chains. Lingua 119: 1035–1065. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alberti, Gábor & Farkas, Judit. 2013. Nouns: Characterization and classification. Ms., University of Pécs and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Preliminary version of a chapter to be published in Comprehensive Grammar Resources – Hungarian: The Noun Phrase. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2013. Manner vs. result complementarity in verbal alternations: A view from the clear alternation. In Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the North East Linguistics Society, Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds), 39–52. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Schäfer, Florian & Spathas, Giorgos. 2013. Delimiting Voice in Germanic: On object drop and naturally reflexive verbs. Handout, Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop 28, University of Leipzig, 3–5 October.
Allerton, David J. 1975. Deletion and proform reduction. Journal of Linguistics 11: 213–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
AnderBois, Scott. 2012. Indefiniteness and the typology of implicit arguments. In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds), 43–53. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph & Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2008. Ellipsis and missing objects. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 251–273. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc P. 1989. Arbitrary null objects and unselective binding. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 45–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1979. Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–581.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2011. Kak tebe lingvistika? Nenavižu! How (not) to analyze Russian verb-stranding constructions. Handout, Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 20, MIT, 13–15 May.
Bárány, András. 2015. Inverse agreement and Hungarian verb paradigms. In Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference [Approaches to Hungarian 14], Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds), 37–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 2017. Pro as a minimal nP: Towards a unified approach to pro-drop. Ms, University of Minho.
Bartos, Huba. 1999. Morfoszintaxis és Interpretáció. A Magyar Inflexiós Jelenségek Szintaktikai Háttere (Morphosyntax and Interpretation. The Syntactic Background of the Hungarian Inflectional Phenomena). PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.
Beavers, John. 2011. On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 335–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Aspectual classes and scales of change. Linguistics 51: 681–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2012. Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 331–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bende-Farkas, Ágnes. 2001. Verb-Object Dependencies in Hungarian and English: A DRT-Based Account. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Bender, Emily. 1999. Constituting context: Null objects in English recipes revisited. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 53–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2012. Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6: 267–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bird, Steven, Klein, Ewan & Loper, Edward. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobrowski, Ireneusz. 1981. Zasady subkategoryzowania czasowników przechodnich występujących w zdaniach bez dopełnień bliższych (Subcategorisational rules of transitive verbs used in sentences without direct objects). Polonica VII: 97–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Cechy Subkategoryzacyjne Polskich Czasowników Przechodnich (Subcategorisational Properties of Transitive Verbs in Polish). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich/Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Pomiędzy koniecznością a przydatnością kategorii gramatycznej (na przykładzie elipsy) (Between the necessity and usefulness of grammatical categories (based on ellipsis)). Polonica XVI: 5–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondaruk, Anna. 2009. Constraints on predicate clefting in Polish. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 65–79. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Copy deletion in Polish predicate clefting. In Sound, Structure and Sense. Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann, Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds), 55–70. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the North East Linguistics Society, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 101–114. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 179–242. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1978. A realistic Transformational Grammar. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan & George A. Miller (eds), 1–59. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. Polyadicity. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed), 149–172. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browne, Wayles. 1971. Verbs and unspecified NP deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 259–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2009. Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP Hypothesis is wrong. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 26–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bułat, Ewa. 2004. The correlation between the type of object, aspect and genericity. Rozprawy Komisji Językowej XXX: 159–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Towards symmetry in the classification of null categories. In PASE Papers 2008, Bożena Rozwadowska & Marek Kuźniak (eds), 35–44. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo ATUT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory Norman. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1998. On dummy objects and the transitivity of run . Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998: 81–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Vicente, Luis. 2013. Verb doubling in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22: 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1994. Syntactic bootstrapping and the acquisition of noun meanings: The mass-count issue. In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, Barbara Lust, Margarita Suñer & John Whitman (eds), 301–318. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The variability of impersonal subjects. In Quantification in Natural Language, Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 107–143. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. 2004. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of arb . Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521–581.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Gawron, Jean Mark. 1996. The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In Quantifiers, Deduction and Context, Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher Piñón & Henriette de Swart (eds), 1–32. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppock, Elisabeth & Wechsler, Stephen. 2012. The objective conjugation in Hungarian: Agreement without phi features. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 699–740. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2013. A semantic solution to the problem of Hungarian object agreement. Natural Language Semantics 21: 345–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 1990. The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.
Costa, João, Martins, Ana Maria & Pratas, Fernanda. 2012. VP ellipsis: New evidence from Capeverdean. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010, Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds), 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cote, Sharon Ann. 1996. Grammatical and Discourse Properties of Null Arguments in English. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culy, Christopher. 1996. Null objects in English recipes. Language Variation and Change 8: 91–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummins, Sarah & Roberge, Yves. 2004. Null objects in French and English. In Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 258], Julie Auger, J. Clancy Clements & Barbara Vance (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax 8: 44–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Lopes, Ruth. 2012. Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. Handout, International Workshop ‘ELLIPSIS2012’, University of Vigo, 9–10 November.
Cyrino, Sonia & Matos, Gabriela. 2002. VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese. A comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 177–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte. 1998. Object agreement in Hungarian. Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar 5: 91–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. Bare noun phrases. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1088–1108. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva. 2011. A Profile of the Hungarian DP: The Interaction of Lexicalization, Agreement and Linearization with the Functional Sequence. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Depiante, Marcela Andrea. 2000. The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Complement Anaphora and Stripping/Bare Argument Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. When Hungarians agree (to disagree)–the fine art of ‘phi’ and ‘art’. Ms, CUNY Graduate Center.
Doron, Edit. 1990. V-movement and VP-ellipsis. Ms, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duguine, Maia. 2014. Argument ellipsis: A unitary approach to pro-drop. The Linguistic Review 31: 515–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dvořák, Věra. 2015. Syntax of generic null objects revisited. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Anna E. Jurgensen, Hannah Sande, Spencer Lamoureux, Kenny Baclawski & Alison Zerbe (eds), 71–97. Berkeley, CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The inverse agreement constraint in Hungarian. A relic of a Uralic-Siberian Sprachbund? In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Jan Koster, Riny Huybregts & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds), 108–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Null pronominal objects in Hungarian: A case of exaptation. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44: 192–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic languages. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 2: 2–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reis (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erterschik-Shir, Nomi. 1977. On the Nature of Island Constraints. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Ibnbari, Lena & Taube, Sharon. 2013. Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua 136: 145–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline. 2013. A comparative perspective on intervention effects on left branch extractions in Slavic. In Non Progredi est Regredi. Festschrift für Alla Paslwaska, Wolodymyr Sulym, Mychajlo Smolij & Chrystyna Djakiw (eds), 266–295. Lwiw: Pais.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 1987. DO pro in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 2, István Kenesei (ed), 191–209. Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & de Swart, Henriëtte. 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane & Rapoport, Tova. 2013. A lexical and information structure account of English instrument-subject constructions. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory, Valentina Apresjan, Boris Iomdin & Ekaterina Ageeva (eds), 41–49. Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 2005. On accumulating and having it all: Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on Aspect. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed), 217–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Lexical aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed), 721–751. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 95–107.
Fodor, Jerry A. & Fodor, Janet. 1980. Functional structure, quantifiers, and meaning postulates. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 759–770.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kučera, Henry. 1979. Brown Corpus manual. Tech. rep. Department of Linguistics, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce & Ross, John Robert. 1970. Idioms and unspecified NP deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 264–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Portero Muñoz, Carmen. 2002. Understood objects in Functional Grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76: 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Merchant, Jason. 1997. On the interpretation of null indefinite objects in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 17: 141–155.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillon, Brendan S. 2012. Implicit complements: A dilemma for model theoretic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 313–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2001. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted. Language Sciences 23: 503–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Constructions, lexical semantics, and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 215–236. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gribanova, Vera. 2013a. A new argument for verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 145–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 91–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej. 1972. Znaczenie polskiego czasownika: Aktualne, potencjalne, habitualne, uniwersalne – w świetle kategorialnego znaczenia form czasu teraźniejszego (The meaning of the Polish verb: Present, potential, habitual, universal – in the light of the categorial meaning of present tense forms). Studia Semiotyczne 3: 161–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groefsema, Marjolein. 1995. Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata. 1978. O generycznym użyciu nazw (On the generic use of names). Polonica IV: 73–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1987a. Complement ellipsis in English: Or how to cook without objects. In Studies in Honour of René Derolez, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (ed), 248–261. Ghent: University of Ghent.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987b. Register variation in English: Some theoretical observations. Journal of English Linguistics 20: 230–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Proceedings of the 9th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 127–144. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Roberts, Ian. 1993. Middle constructions in Dutch and English. In Knowledge and Language, Vol. II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, Eric Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds), 183–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhn, Georg F.K. 2016. Unagreement is an illusion: Apparent person mismatches and nominal structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 543–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Remarks on the status of null objects. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Robert Freidin (ed), 56–76. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husband, Edward Matthew. 2011. Rescuing manner/result complementarity from certain death. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society , 111–124. Chicago, IL: CLS.
Hyams, Nina & Wexler, Kenneth. 1993. On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 421–459.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 1993/1994. Input and learnability: Direct object omissibility in English. Language Acquisition 3: 95–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2011. On development of antipassive function: What do Australian and Slavonic languages have in common? In Formalization of Grammar in Slavic Languages: Contributions of the Eighth International Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL VIII, University of Potsdam, December 2–5, 2009, Peter Kosta & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 207–220. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Li. 2012. Nominal Arguments and Language Variation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Kardos, Éva Aliz. 2012. Toward a Scalar Semantic Analysis of Telicity in Hungarian. PhD dissertation, University of Debrecen.
Karolak, Stanisław. 1984. Składnia wyrażeń predykatywnych (The syntax of predicates). In Gramatyka Współczesnego Języka Polskiego. Składnia (The Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Syntax), Zuzanna Topolińska (ed), 11–211. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2011. Semantics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmilan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert M. & Fenyvesi, Anna. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keresztes, Júlia. 2013. On Hungarian Object-Drop. MA thesis, Pázmány Péter Catholic University.
Keyser, S. Jay & Roeper, Thomas. 1992. Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1990. Noun incorporation in Hungarian. Ms, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Published as Kiefer, Ferenc. 1990–1991. Noun incorporation in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 40: 149–177).
. 1994. Aspect and syntactic structure. In The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 415–464. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Alaktan (Morphology). In Új Magyar Nyelvtan (New Grammar of Hungarian), Ferenc Kiefer, Péter Siptár & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 189–284. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Aspektus és Akcióminőség Különös Tekintettel a Magyar Nyelvre (Aspect and Aktionsart with Special Reference to Hungarian). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Soowon. 1999. Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 255–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowaluk, Agnieszka. 1999. Null objects in Polish: Pronouns and determiners in Second Language Acquisition. RCEAL Working Papers 6: 135–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2005. Building resultatives. In Events in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds), 177–212. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 187–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lamontagne, Greg & Travis, Lisa. 1987. The syntax of adjacency. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 6, Megan Crowhurst (ed), 173–186. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2006. Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)-fronting. Syntax 9: 32–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 357–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. Implicit arguments in situation semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 169–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard (with Marcela Depiante and Arthur Stepanov). 2000. Syntactic Structures Revisited. Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2013. Null and cognate objects and changes in (in)transitivity. Evidence from the history of English. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 60: 69–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Chi Wai (Patrick). 2014. Learning and Unlearning Object Drop in Nonanaphoric and Anaphoric Contexts in L2 English. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1970. Verbs and deletable objects. Lingua 25: 227–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Proceedings of the 35th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle & Aaron M. Griffith (eds), 223–247. Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Verb classes within and across languages. Ms, Stanford University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1999. Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 199–223. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Edward L. Keenan (ed), 178–188. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 457–489. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó. 2012. V-stranding ellipsis and verbal identity. The role of polarity focus. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012: 82–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The syntax of emphatic positive polarity in Hungarian: Evidence from ellipsis. Lingua 128: 72–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés & Lipták, Anikó. 2016. Movement and deletion after syntax: Licensing by inflection reconsidered. Studia Linguistica 70: 66–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Dilin. 2008. Intransitive or object deleting? Classifying English verbs used without an object. Journal of English Linguistics 36: 289–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. On little n, √, and types of nouns. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedűs & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Bingfu, Zhang, Guohua & Bisang, Walter. 2015. Valency classes in Mandarin. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 709–764. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marelj, Marijana. 2004. Middles and Argument Structure across Languages. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 2006. Emphatic affirmation and polarity: Contrasting European Portuguese with Brazilian Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan and Galician. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2004 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 278], Jenny Doetjes & Paz González (eds), 197–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Double realization of verbal copies in European Portuguese emphatic affirmation. In The Copy Theory of Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 77–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Emphatic polarity in European Portuguese and beyond. Lingua 128: 95–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa. 2015. Grammar versus pragmatics: Carving nature at the joints. Mind & Language 30: 437–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massam, Diane & Roberge, Yves. 1989. Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 134–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85: 259–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McShane, Marjorie J. 1999. The ellipsis of accusative direct objects in Russian, Polish and Czech. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 7: 45–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Hierarchies of parallelism in elliptical Polish structures. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 83–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. A Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 1999. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Mittwoch, Anita. 1971. Idioms and unspecified NP deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 255–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. On the difference between eating and eating something: Activities versus accomplishments. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 113–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Unspecified arguments in episodic and habitual sentences. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 237–254. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montalbetti, Mario M. 1984. After Binding. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Mykhaylyk, Roksolana & Sopata, Aldona. 2016. Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian. Applied Psycholinguistics 37: 1051–1082. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans. 2012. The linguistic expression of causation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Tal Siloni, Martin Everaert & Marijana Marelj (eds), 20–51. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Németh T., Enikő. 2000. Occurrence and identification of implicit arguments in Hungarian. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1657–1682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Az implicit alanyi és tárgyi igei argumentumok előfordulásának lexikai-szemantikai jellemzői (The lexical-semantic properties of the occurrence of implicit subject and direct object arguments). Ms, University of Szeged. (Published as Németh T., Enikő. 2008. Az implicit alanyi és tárgyi igei argumentumok előfordulásának lexikai-szemantikai jellemzői. In Stukturális Magyar Nyelvtan, 4: A Szótár Szerkezete (Structural Grammar of Hungarian, 4: The Structure of the Lexicon), Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 71–128. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó).
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case Effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 273–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A Theory of Selection and Reconstruction in the Minimalist Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Olsen, Mari Broman & Resnik, Philip. 1997. Implicit object constructions and the (in)transitivity continuum. In Proceedings of the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society , 327–336. Chicago, IL: CLS.
Otani, Kazuyo & Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 345–358.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos. 2003. Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 381–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pedersen, Walter. 2011. Implicit arguments, paychecks and variable-free semantics. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds), 155–175. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2013. Noun phrase structure in article-less Slavic languages: DP or not DP? Language and Linguistics Compass 7: 201–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Pirvulescu, Mihaela & Roberge, Yves. 2008. Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua 118: 370–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Roberge, Yves & Castilla, Anny. 2013. On the development of null implicit objects in L1 English. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 58: 443–464.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, Manuela. 2013. Tracking reference with null subjects. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2013: 131–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pisarkowa, Krystyna. 1968. Zaimek w polskim zdaniu: 3. Obserwacje zaimka odmiennego w grupie orzeczenia (The pronoun in the Polish sentence: 3. Observations about the inflecting pronoun in the verb phrase). Język Polski XLVIII: 187–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. Funkcje Składniowe Polskich Zaimków Odmiennych (Syntactic Functions of the Polish Inflecting Pronouns). Wrocław: Zakład Narowowy Imienia Ossolińskich/Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1969. On so-called pronouns in English. In Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar, David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds), 201–224. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potashnik, Joseph. 2012. Emission verbs. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Tal Siloni, Martin Everaert & Marijana Marelj (eds), 251–278. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Determiner phrase in a language without determiners (with apologies to Jim Huang 1982). Journal of Linguistics 34: 165–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam, Bańko, Mirosław, Górski, Rafał L. & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (eds). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (National Corpus of Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo P. 1986. On the null object in European Portuguese. In Studies in Romance Linguistics, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalán (eds), 373–390. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal structure of events. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan Rothstein (ed), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2007. It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 123–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The Theta System: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Resnik, Philip. 1993. Selection and Information: A Class-Based Approach to Lexical Relationships. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
. 1996. Selectional constraints: An information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Cognition 61: 127–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, Sally. 1988. Unlikely lexical entries. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 202–212. Berkeley, CA: BLS.
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1995. On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 405–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa. 2000. Impersonal SIĘ in Polish: A Simplex Expression anaphor. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 199–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa & Milojević Sheppard, Milena. 2003. Indefinite reflexive clitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 89–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 58–87. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On the nature of syntactic parameters: A programme for research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds), 319–334. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rocquet, Amélie. 2013. Splitting Objects. A Nanosyntactic Account of Direct Object Marking. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
Ross, John Rober. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 252–286. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruda, Marta. 2013a. Dopełnienia domyślne a elipsa frazy werbalnej: Analiza składniowa kontekstów konfirmatywnych w ujęciu minimalistycznym (Null objects and VP ellipsis: Syntactic analysis of polar contexts within the minimalist framework). Polonica XXXIII: 193–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Wypowiedzi emfatyczne i topikalizacja V(P) z powtórzeniem czasownika jako elipsa VP i realizacja akustyczna dwóch kopii V (Verb doubling emphatic affirmation and V(P) topicalisation as VP ellipsis and accoustic realisation of two copies of V). Polonica XXXIII: 213–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014a. The impersonal subject -􀨎/􀨔 construction in Polish and the typology of Voice heads. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9: 203–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. Missing objects in special registers: The syntax of null objects in English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 59: 339–372.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014c. On the V-stranding VP ellipsis analysis of missing objects in Polish. In Proceedings of the Third Central European Conference in Linguistics for Postgraduate Students, Balázs Surányi & Gergő Turi (eds), 60–85. Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. NP ellipsis (effects) in Polish and Hungarian: FFs on Fs, Agree, and Chain Reduction. The Linguistic Review 33: 649–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Syntactic representation of null arguments: [NP e] as [ np n] (minimally). In Understanding Null Subjects. A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Runić, Jelena. 2013. A new look at clitics: Evidence from Slavic. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Third Indiana Meeting 2012, Steven Franks, Markus Dickinson, George Fowler, Melissa Witcombe & Ksenia Zanon (eds), 275–288. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef. 2004. The Interaction of Valence and Information Structure. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
. 2005. Regularities in null instantiation. Ms, Saarland University.
Ruppenhofer, Josef & Michaelis, Laura A. 2010. A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2: 158–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English. Ms, Hildesheim University and University of Colorado.
Rutkowski, Paweł. 2002. Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish. Jezikoslovlje 3: 159–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saloni, Zygmunt. 1976. Cechy Składniowe Polskiego Czasownika (Syntactic Features of the Polish Verb). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2006. When less is more: Implicit arguments and relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 139–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Şener, Serkan & Takahashi, Daiko. 2010. Ellipsis of arguments in Japanese and Turkish. Nanzan Linguistics 6: 79–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 267–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sopata, Aldona. 2016. Null objects in adult and child Polish: Syntax, discourse and pragmatics. Lingua 183: 86–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher Damian. 1992. Deletion, Deaccenting and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Thoms, Gary. 2010. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. Ms, University of Strathclyde (Published as Thoms, Gary. 2011. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis. Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2010, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed), 252–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2003. The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its crosslinguistic implications. In The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 61], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 321–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Topolińska, Zuzanna. 1977. Wyznaczoność (tj. charakterystyka referencyjna) grupy imiennej w tekście polskim, II (Reference (i.e. referential properties) of noun phrases in Polish texts, II). Polonica III: 59–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Składnia grupy imiennej (The syntax of noun phrases). In Gramatyka Współczesnego Języka Polskiego. Składnia (The Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Syntax), Zuzanna Topolińska (ed), 301–389. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trinh, Tue. 2009. A constraint on copy deletion. Theoretical Linguistics 35: 183–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tryzna, Marta Maria. 2015. Acquisition of object clitics in child Polish: Evidence for three developmental stages. Lingua 161: 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1977. A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step towards Discourse Analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Papadopoulou, Despina. 2006. Aspect and argument realization: A study on antecedentless null objects in Greek. Lingua 116: 1595–1615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turkowska, Maria. 1981. O wyznaczoności (On reference). Polonica VII: 47–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vicente, Luis. 2007. The Syntax of Heads and Phrases: A Study of Verb (Phrase) Fronting. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Wang, Qi, Lillo-Martin, Diane, Best, Catherine T. & Levit, Andrea. 1992. Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2: 221–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86: 332–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Word Meaning and Syntax: Approaches to the Interface. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2012. Null Complement Anaphors as definite descriptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Anca Chereches (ed), 125–145. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Arguments in Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Step by Step. Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 319–346. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Event, Individuation and Countability. A Study with Special Reference to English and Polish. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On the feature valuation/interpretability biconditional in Minimalist Theory. The case of (un)interpretable gender. In Sound, Structure and Sense. Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann, Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds), 761–806. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2004. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343–360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue