Cover not available

In:Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 127–153

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Position-related subject properties change in English

 | Radboud University Nijmegen and SIL-International
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.07kom
Abstract
Subjects in Old English can occur in a number of different positions. Their distribution changes over time, especially during and after the loss of the non-obligatory verb-second word order that characterised Old English. A question that has not been raised is whether the disappearance of subject positions is preceded by a loss of subject-specific properties connected with these positions. This paper investigates two such properties: subject-deletion under coordination, and subject-position related verb type selection. The decrease of the Middle Field and Post Field subject positions is, indeed, preceded by a steeper decline in the former property, while the latter property reveals an increasing specificity in terms of the types of verbs associating with the Post Field position.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject positions
  • 3.Subject properties
  • 4.Method
  • 5.The change in subject properties per subject position
    • 5.1Changing subject positions
    • 5.2Subject elision under coordination
      • 5.2.1The global picture
      • 5.2.2The Middle Field position “3”
      • 5.2.3The Post Field position “4”
      • 5.2.4The Post Field position “5”
      • 5.2.5 The Fore Field position “1”
      • 5.2.6The Fore Field position “2”
    • 5.3Subject-verb relations
      • 5.3.1 Subject type distribution in the Fore Field
      • 5.3.2 Subject type distribution in the Middle Field
      • 5.3.3Subject type distribution in the Post Field
      • 5.3.4Subject type specificity
  • 6.Conclusions and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Allen, Cynthia. 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25:110–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans. 2011. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boag, Scott, Chamberlin, Don, Fernández, Mary, Florescu, Daniela, Robie, Jonathan & Siméon, Jérôme. 2010. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, 2nd edn. W3C Recommendation. <[URL]>
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht MA: Reidel.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Harbert, Wayne, Hermon, Gabriella & Sridhar, S. N. 1980. The acquisition of subjecthood. Language 56: 719–743.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2013. On German modal particles and their interaction with illocutionary force and clause type. In The Role of Modal Particles in Speech Acts. Ms, Venice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1964. From comparative word-order studies. Brno Studies in English 4: 111–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Ronald & van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. The interaction between syntax, information structure and prosody in word order change. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), 803–821. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & van Kemenade, Ans. 1993. Subjects, nominative case, agreement and functional heads. Lingua 89: 181–215.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1975. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 303–333. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Sentential negation and word order in Old English. In Negation in the History of English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Gunnel Tottie & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 147–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and Information Structure: Verb second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 1, Bettelou Los, María José López-Couso & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Komen, Erwin. 2013. Finding Focus: A Study of the Historical Development of Focus in English. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. <[URL]>
. 2010. Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. <[URL] >
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn. <[URL]>
Lambrecht, Knud. 2010. Constraints on the subject-focus mapping in French and English. In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 165], Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds), 77–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen. 2009. Self-instruction Materials on Narrative Discourse Analysis. San Antonio TX: SIL-International. <[URL] >
Los, Bettelou & Dreschler, Gea. 2012. The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to permissive subjects. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), 859–872. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou, López-Couso, María José & Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2012. On the interplay of syntax and information structure. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 1, Bettelou Los, María José López-Couso & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds), 3–18. Oxford: OUP.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund Raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra A. Thompson & William Mann (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Isn’t it? or is it not? On the order of postverbal subject and negative particle in the history of English. In Negation in the History of English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Gunnel Tottie & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 189–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin. 2010. German Vorfeld-filling as constraint interaction. In Constraints in Discourse, Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds), 267–290. Berlin: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Athony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. <[URL]>
Warner, Anthony. 2007. Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11: 81–111.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue