Cover not available

In:Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 103–125

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
The information status of late subjects in passive main clauses in Old English

 | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.06dre
Abstract
This paper investigates properties of late subjects, i.e. subjects that occur after the VP, in Old English (OE), focusing on passive main clauses. Specifically, I test the hypothesis presented by Biberauer & van Kemenade (2011) that the late subject position in OE is reserved for new subjects. First, an analysis of the information status of late subjects shows that the majority of them are indeed new to the discourse, although they are nevertheless often cognitively accessible for the reader. Second, a comparison of subjects in three positions in the clause – high, medial and late – provides further evidence for the effect of weight (length) on late placement of subjects, while the effects of definiteness and clause-initial element are less straightforward.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject positions for IA subjects in OE and their information-structural properties
  • 3.The information status of late passive subjects in OE
    • 3.1Data and method of selection
    • 3.2The information status of late subjects in passive main clauses
  • 4.Other factors influencing subject placement: Weight, definiteness and clause-initial element
    • 4.1Weight
    • 4.2Definiteness
    • 4.3Clause-initial element
  • 5. Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (35)
References
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans. 2011. Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 17–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2005. Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 5–46.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Cascading parameter changes: internally driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113], Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), 79–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, Betty & Ward, Gregory. 1998. Information Status and Canonical Word Order in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language 70: 72–131.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, William. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreschler, Gea. 2015. Passives and the Loss of Verb Second: A Study of Syntactic and Information-Structural Factors. PhD Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed), 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle & Michaelis, Laura. 2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1665–1706.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 2002. Observations on the loss of Verb Second in the history of English. In Studies in Comparative Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 45], Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 245–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haug, Dag, Eckhoff, Hanne & Welo, Eirik. 2014. The theoretical foundations of givenness annotation. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 17–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120: 315–328.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. V2 and Embedded topicalisation in Old and Middle English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemnade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 326–352. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 224–248. Oxford: Blackwell.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Milićev, Tanja. 2012. Syntax and discourse in Old English and Middle English word order. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Donas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 239–255. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: V2 variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], María Anneli Meurmann-Solin, José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Komen, Erwin, Hebing, Rosanne, van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou. 2014. Quantifying information structure change in English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 81–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Komen, Erwin. 2009. Corpus Studio. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen. <[URL]>
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Dreschler, Gea. 2012. The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to permissive subjects. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elisabeth C. Traugott (eds), 859–871. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McColl Millar, Robert. 2000. Some suggestions for explaining the origin and development of the definite article in English. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 275–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 18–20, 157–189. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–54. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randall, Beth. 2005–2007. CorpusSearch 2. <[URL]>
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of Linguistics, University of York. <[URL]>
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2011. The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 71–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], María Anneli Meurmann-Solin, José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 47–65. Oxford: OUP.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Testing the theory: Information structure in Old English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 53–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony. 2007. Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11: 81–111.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behavior. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue