Cover not available

In:Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte
Edited by Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo Miró and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 239] 2017
► pp. 1–24

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

Boundaries, phases and interfaces

 | Ikerbasque and UPV/EHU
 | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
 | Universidad de Alcalá
Published online: 14 June 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.01cas
Article outline
  • 1.Boundaries: cycles and phases
    • 1.1Phases and grammatical theory
    • 1.2The propositional nature of phases. From phases to interfaces
  • 2.Syntax and its interfaces
    • 2.1The Syntax-Phonology interface
    • 2.2The Syntax-Semantics interface
    • 2.3The Syntax-Discourse interface
    • 2.4The Lexicon-Syntax interface
    • 2.5The Syntax-Morphology interface
  • 3.Interfaces meet phases (and the other way around)
    • 3.1.The left periphery
    • 3.2Parameters
    • 3.3(In)Definiteness
    • 3.4Tense, aspect, and modality
  • 4.Structure of the book
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (127)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive Cyclicity, Antilocality and Adposition Stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Morphology ≠ syntax. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 325–352. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33: 238–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adger, David & Borer, Hagit. 2009. General preface. In InterPhases: Phase-theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, Kleanthes K. Grohmann (ed.), vii. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. 1992. Amorphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 1998. VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio. 2015. Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013. Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8], Enoch Aboh, Aafke Hulk, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr. 2009. The Phase Model and Adverbials. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005a. Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Structuring Sense, Vol. II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking Form. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2010. Phases beyond clauses. Ms, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 39–103. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention [Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics 2]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, Fox, Danny & Spector, Benjamin. 2012. The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 3], Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2297–2331. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language [Current Studies in Linguistics 36], Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Foreword. In Phases, Developing the Framework, Angel J. Gallego (ed.), 1–8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Halle, Morris & Lukoff, Fred. 1956. On accent and juncture in English. In For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, 11 October 1956, Morris Halle, Horace G. Lunt, Hugh McLean & Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (eds), 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guggielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citko Barbara. 2014. Phase Theory. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & van Oostendorp, Marc. To appear. When imperfections are perfect: Prosody, phi-features and deixis in Central and Southern Italian vocatives. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dehé, Nicole. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 2006. Qué es sintáctico y qué es léxico en la interficie entre sintaxis y léxico-semántica. Signo y Seña 15: 17–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Parámetros y variación en la interfaz léxico-sintaxis. In Panorama de sintaxis, Angel J. Gallego (ed.), 383–421. Madrid: AKAL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1990. Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobashi, Yoshihiko. 2003. Phonological Phrasing and Syntactic Derivation. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drummond, Alex, Hornstein, Norbert & Lasnik, Howard. 2010. A puzzle about P-stranding and a possible solution. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 689–692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka. 2008. An overview of theories of the syntax-phonology interface. Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 42: 209–286.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka & Irurtzun, Aritz. 2012. Movimiento y prosodia. In El movimiento de constituyentes, José María Brucart & Ángel J. Gallego (eds), 213–234. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Ralph. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 289–325. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rapoport, Tova R. 2004. Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Alexander Lecarme (eds), 217–234. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo. 2016. Inter-speaker variation, optimality theory and the prosody of clitic left-dislocations in Spanish. Probus 28(2): 293–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann & Gabriel, Christoph (eds). 2016. Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J. 2012: Introduction: A framework of phases for linguistic theory. In Phases, Developing the Framework, Angel J. Gallego (ed.), 9–44. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 2010. Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (ed.). 2009. InterPhases: Phase-theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers at the Interface [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis, 425–449. Cambridge MA: MITWpl.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds), 275–288. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar [Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistic 13]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1992. Aspect and theta theory. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Iggy M. Roca (ed.), 145–174. Berlin: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek. 1996. Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and its Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Event semantics in the lexicon–syntax interface: Verb frame alternations in Dutch and their acquisition. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 239–282. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2006. Pragmatics [Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out (Map, FI, MSO). The Linguistic Review 24: 2–3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2002. Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. New York NY: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The relation between morphology and syntax. In The The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 209–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2005. Towards a phase-based theory of sentential stress. In Perspectives on Phases [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49], Martha McGinnis & Norvin Richards (eds), 125–46. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard C. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cabridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Prepositional complementizers as attractors. Probus 11: 39–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Prepositions as probes. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 192–212. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth. 2012. The syntax/pragmatics interface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, Keith Allan & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds), Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71(4): 669–695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2015. The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds, and Content: New Approaches in Word Semantics, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Reiser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika & Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2007. Phase Theory and prosodic spell-out: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24: 93–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven Guy. 1980. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 2011. Clauses, propositions and phases. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, Anna Maria Di Sciulo & Cedric Boeckx (eds), 366–391. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 23]. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax. Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Words. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–220. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, Robert. 1978. The Grammar of Quantification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 12]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1973. Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4): 509–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6(2): 203–300.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014a. The history of formal semantics: Changing notions of semantic competence. Paper presented at the 2014 Annual Joshua and Verona Taylor Whatmough Lecture Whatmough Lecture in Linguistics , Harvard University, Cambridge MA: April 28. <[URL]> (1 January 2016).
. 2014b. A brief history of the syntax-semantics interface in Western formal linguistics. Semantics-Syntax Interface 1(1): 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. The Garden of Eden period for deep structure and semantics. In 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 77], Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds), 187–198. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Asking what a meaning does: David Lewis’s contributions to semantics. In A Companion to David Lewis, Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds), 328–344. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 1997. Aspect and Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gilliam & Reiss, Charles (eds). 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randall, Janet H. 2010. Linking: The Geometry of Argument Structure [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 74]. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Marc D. 2004. Object Shift and Scrambling in North and West Germanic: A Case Study in Symmetrical Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Rosen, Sara Thomas. 1998. Delimiting events. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 135–164. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Event structure and ergativity. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 187–238. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Topic or aspect: Functional heads, features and the grammaticalization of events. In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Marie Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 21–40. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara Thomas. 2007. Structured events, structured discourse. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 181–208. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 222–272. Waltham MA: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2015. The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and Prosody. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget. 2011. A minimalist program for phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 574–594. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
di Sciullo, Ana Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Second Edition, John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C.L. Yu (eds), 435–484. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 2012. Syntax and semantics: An overview. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 3], Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2173–2223. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, David Adger, Cécile De Cat & Geroge Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. 1…3-2. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gilliam Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 239–288. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter, Ramchand, Gillian, Starke, Michal & Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 2009. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 36(1). Special issue of Nanosyntax. Tromsø: Universitet i Tromsø.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.). 1997. Ways of Scope Taking [Studies in Linguistic and Philosophy 65]. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol L. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 2000. Event structure in syntax. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanrell, M. Mar, Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 2014. Dialectal variation at the Prosody-Syntax interface: Evidence from Catalan and Spanish interrogatives. Proceedings of Speech Prosody , 253–282. Trinity College, Dublin.
Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Dumping lexicalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 353–382. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte & Onea, Edgar. 2011. Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua 121(11): 1651–1670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bîlbîie, Gabriela
2020. A constraint-based approach to linguistic interfaces. Lingvisticae Investigationes 43:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue