In:Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 407–430
Semantic constraints on the reflexive/non-reflexive alternation of Romanian unaccusatives
Adina Dragomirescu | “Iorgu Iordan – Al. Rosetti” Institute for Linguistics, Romanian Academy & University of Bucharest
Alexandru Nicolae | “Iorgu Iordan – Al. Rosetti” Institute for Linguistics, Romanian Academy & University of Bucharest
Published online: 30 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.13dra
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.13dra
Abstract
The paper discusses semantic effects associated with the alternation between the reflexive and the non-reflexive form of a restricted class of 38 Romanian unaccusative verbs. We start by summarizing the values of the Romanian reflexive marker se and then we present the inventory of Romanian unaccusatives which enter the reflexive/non-reflexive alternation. Finally, we tell apart several classes of Romanian alternating unaccusatives on the basis of the factors which dictate the choice of the reflexive or the non-reflexive form, we compare these factors with the ones that are at play for other Romance languages, and we conclude that a unitary semantic analysis of the alternation is not available for Romanian.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Romanian data
- 2.1The values of Romanian se
- 2.1.1 Se as a reflexive/reciprocal pronoun
- 2.1.2 Se as a formative of inherently reflexive predicates
- 2.1.3Anticausative se
- 2.1.4Summary
- 2.1.5 Se as a voice marker
- 2.2The reflexive/non-reflexive alternation of Romanian unaccusatives
- 2.2.1Preliminary remarks
- 2.2.2Inventory of alternating unaccusatives
- 2.1The values of Romanian se
- 3.Romanian vs Romance
- 4.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (31)
Alboiu, Gabriela, Barrie, Michael & Frigeni, Chiara. 2004.
SE and the unaccusative-unergative paradox. In Curent Studies in Comparative Romance Linguistics [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 107], Martine Coene, Gretel de Cuyper & Yves d’Hulst (eds), 109–139. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Achard, Michel. 2008. Verbes de rupture simples et réfléchis: Deux constructions intransitives. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert & Bernard Laks (eds), 2377–2388. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.
Calude, Andreea S. 2007. Light and heavy reflexive marking. The middle domain in Romanian. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5: 239–269.
Cennamo, Michela. 2012. Aspectual constraints on the (anti)causative alternation in Old Italian. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 394–421.
Cennamo, Michela & Jezek, Elisabetta. 2011. The anticausative alternation in Italian. In Le Interfacce, Giovanna Massariello & Silvana Dal Masi (eds), 809–823. Roma: Bulzoni.
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 1998. Remarks on syntax and the interpretation of Romanian middle passive SE sentences. Revue roumaine de linguistique XLIII(5–6): 317–342.
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Nicolae, Alexandru. 2015. The grammaticalization of a constraint of passive-reflexive constructions in Romanian. In Diachronic Variation in Romanian, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Nicula, Alexandru Nicolae & Louise Esher (eds), 309–361. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3): 399–437.
. 2004. Se‑Si type anaphors. SynCom Project. <[URL]>
. The SE-anaphor and its role in argument realization. Ms.
Dragomirescu, Adina. 2010. Ergativitatea: Tipologie, sintaxă, semantică. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
2013. Intransitive verbs. In The Grammar of Romanian, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), 72–78. Oxford: OUP.
Forest, Robert. 1988. Sémantisme entéléchnique et affinité descriptive: Pour une réanalyse des verbes symétriques et neutres en français. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 83: 137–162.
GALR 2008 I, II – Gramatica limbii române, Vol. I: Cuvântul; Vol. II: Enunţul, Valeria Guţu Romalo (ed.). Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.
GBLR 2010 – Gramatica de bază a limbii române, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.). Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic Gold.
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 77–138.
Labelle, Marie & Doron, Edit. 2010. Anticausative derivations (and other valency alternations) in French. Probus 22: 303–316.
Lekakou, Marika. 2005. In the Middle, Somewhat Elevated. The Semantics of Middles and its Crosslinguistic Realization. PhD dissertation, University of London.
Maldonaldo, Ricardo. 1988. Energetic reflexives in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 153–165. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Manoliu-Manea, Maria. 1993. Inalienabilitate şi topicalitate în limba română. In Gramatică, pragmasemantică şi discurs, Maria Manoliu-Manea, 72–89. Bucharest: Editura Litera.
Nicolae, Alexandru. 2013. A note on the syntax of Romanian aspectual verbs: Aspectuals and voice. In „Cuvinte potrivite”. Omagiu doamnei Maria Marin la aniversare, Daniela Răuţu, Adrian Rezeanu, Dana-Mihaela Zamfir (eds), 353–371. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela. 2011. Impersonals with passive morphology. In Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Luis A. Ortiz-López (ed.), 314–324. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela. 2006. Din nou despre diateză. Consideraţii pe marginea soluţiei din noua gramatică academică, In Studii de gramatică şi de formare a cuvintelor. Omagiu Mioarei Avram, Marius Sala (ed.), 332–339. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal. 2003, Thematic arity operations and parametric variation. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics TL-03-001. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Rothemberg, Mira. 1974. Les verbes à la fois transitifs et intransitifs en français contemporain. Paris: Mouton.
