In:Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 251–273
Object omission and the semantics of predicates in Italian in a comparative perspective
Published online: 30 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.08cen
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.08cen
Abstract
This paper discusses the semantics of O(bject) omission with divalent verbs in Italian, in relation to (i) the interplay of the inherent and structural aspects of verb meaning with the degree of thematic specification of the subject (i.e., agentivity/control); (ii) the inherent characteristics of the O argument (e.g., animacy); (iii) the degree of semantic implication between the verb and O; (iv) the role played by the linguistic and extra-linguistic context. It is shown that object omission in Italian is highly sensitive to the event structure template of verbs (e.g., the low degree of aspectual specification of verbs) and the elements of meaning lexicalized in the verb, interacting, in turn, with other semantic and discourse-pragmatic parameters. Whereas the constraints on Indefinite Null Instantiation appear to be similar to those at work in other languages (e.g, English and French), those applying to Definite Null Instantiation display more variability.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Object omission, event structure and transitivity: Some current issues and views
- 2.1Event structure and the licensing of arguments
- 2.1.1Structure vs constant/root participants and argument realization
- 2.2The (in)transitivity continuum and the semanto-pragmatics of object omission
- 2.1Event structure and the licensing of arguments
- 3.The semantics of predicates and object omission in Italian
- 3.1(Sub)types of object omission
- 3.1.1Indefinite Null Instantiation (Perfective and imperfective contexts)
- 3.1.2Indefinite Null Instantiation (Imperfective contexts only)
- 3.1.3Definite Null Instantiation
- 3.1.4Unexpressed objects and event structure in Italian
- 3.1(Sub)types of object omission
- 4.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (51)
Butt, Miriam & King, Tracy Holloway. 1997. Null elements in discourse structure. In Papers from the NULLS Seminar, Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas.
Cennamo, Michela. 2003. (In)transitivity and object marking: Some current issues. In Romance Objects [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 27], Giuliana Fiorentino (ed.), 49–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2011. Transitivi e intransitivi, verbi. In Enciclopedia dell'italiano, Vol II, Raffaele Simone (ed.), 535–539. Rome: Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana G. Treccani.
Cennamo, Michela & Lenci, Allesandro. Forthcoming. Gradience in subcategorization? Locative phrases with Italian verbs of motion. Studia Linguistica.
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Coseriu, Eugenio 1971. Solidarietà lessicali. In Teoria del Linguaggio e Linguistica Generale. Sette Studi, 303–316. Bari: Laterza.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Cummings, Sarah & Roberge, Yves. 2005. A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax 8(1): 44–64.
Demonte, Violeta & McNally, Louise. 2012. Introduction. In Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.
Depraetere, Ilse. 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 1–19.
Farrel, Peter. 1990. Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 325-46l.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul. 1993. Construction Grammar Coursework, MS. Berkeley: University of California.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
. 2005. Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional Approaches to Language 3], Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds), 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grimshaw, Jane. 2005[1993]. Semantic structure and semantic content in lexical representation. In Words and Structure, Jane Grimshaw, 75–89. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Transitivity prominence. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 131–47.
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2012. The Monotonicity Hypothesis. In Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 139–161 Oxford: OUP.
Lambrecht, Knud & Lemoine, Kevin. 2005. Definite null objects in (spoken) French: A construction grammar account. In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots [Constructional Approaches to Language 4], Mirjam Fried & Hans C. Boas (eds), 13–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin. 2012. Rethinking FNI. On null instantiation and control in construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 4(1): 1–23.
Lo Duca, Maria Giuseppa. 2000. Proprietà valenziali e criteri di descrizione lessicografica: Un caso di alternanza argomentale. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 29(2): 219–242.
Malchukov, Andrej. 2015. Valency classes and alternations: parameters of variation. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 73–130.
Malchukov, Andrej & Comrie, Bernard (eds). 2015. Valency Patterns in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Olsen, Mari Broman & Resnik, Philip. 1997. Implicit object constructions and the (in)transitivity continuum. CLS 33: 327–336.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008 Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. Building scalar changes. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds), 259–81. Oxford: OUP.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.
. 2010. Reflections on Manner/Result complementarity. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav & Ivy Sichel (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Ruppenhofer, Josef & Michaelis, Laura A. 2010. A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 158–184.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro
. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–557.
Sag, Ivan A. 2007. Sign-based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis. Ms, Department of Linguistics, University of Stanford.
