In:Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 109–149
A labeling system for valency
Linguistic coverage and applications
Published online: 30 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.04kro
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.04kro
Abstract
We illustrate a format for valence representation called the Construction Labeling system (CL), earlier presented in Hellan and Dakubu 2010, which can be used in annotation of single examples and in enumerations and collections of valency types. It is applicable across language families and has been used for Germanic, Kwa, Ethio-Semitic, Bantu and Indo-Aryan languages. It is formally defined so as to be interoperable with digital and computational applications. The illustration of the format will first be done for the closely related languages Norwegian and English, and then contrasting these to Ga (spoken in Ghana). Among digital utilizations of the system we mention a multilingual valency repository and a strategy of grammar induction from annotated text.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Construction Labeling (CL) notation
- 3.Labeling valence patterns of English and Norwegian
- 3.1Syntactic argument structure of Norwegian
- 3.2Illustrating CL on simple patterns in Norwegian and English
- 3.3Shared complex patterns
- 3.4Un-shared complex patterns
- 3.5Valency profiles
- 4.Valency and construction patterns of Ga
- 4.1Patterns
- 4.2Summarizing remarks
- 5.Utilizing CL notation in Grammar and in Ontology
- 5.1Grammatical interpretation of CL templates
- 5.2Induction of grammar from Interlinear Glossed Text (IGT) and CL jointly
- 5.3Using CL templates for designing a construction ontology.
- 6.‘Life cycles’ of systems and applications using CL
- 7.Comparisons with Coding frames in ValPal
- 8.Final remarks
Notes References Appendix
References (47)
Beermann, Dorothee. 2014. Data management and analysis for less documented languages. In Language Documentation and New Technology, Mari C. Jones & Christopher Connolly (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Beermann, Dorothee & Mihaylov, Pavel. 2013. Collaborative databasing and resource sharing for linguists. Languages Resources and Evaluation 48(2): 203–225.
Bender, Emily M., Drellishak, Scott, Fokkens, Antske, Poulson, Laurie & Saleem, Safiyyah. 2010. Grammar customization. Research on Language & Computation 8(1): 23–72.
Bender, Emily M., Goodman, Michael Wayne, Crowgey, Joshua & Xia, Fei. 2013. Towards creating precision grammars from interlinear glossed text: Inferring large-scale typological properties. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 74–83. Sofia.
Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp. 2008a. Ga verb features. In Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 100], Felix Ameka & Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu (eds), 91–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2008b. The construction label project: A tool for typological study. Presented at West African Languages Congress (WALC), Winneba.
Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp & Hellan, Lars. 2016. Ga Verb classes and Valency classes. Presented at 2nd Conference on West African Languages (SyWAL 2), University of Vienna.
Farrar, Scott & Langendoen, D. Terrence. 2003. A linguistic ontology for the semantic web. GLOT International 7(3): 97–100.
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hellan, Lars. 2008. Enumerating verb constructions cross-linguistically. In Proceedings from COLING Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks. Manchester. <[URL]>
. 2010. From descriptive annotation to grammar specification. In Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW4), 172–176, ACL. <[URL]>
. 2014. Infinitive construction types in Norwegian. An inventory. <[URL]> (4 September 2014).
Hellan. Lars. to appear. A design for the analysis of bare nominalizations in Norwegian. In A. Malicka-Kleparska & M. Bloch-Trojnar (eds.) Aspect and valency in nominals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hellan, Lars & Beermann, Dorothee. 2011. Inducing grammar from IGT. In Proceedings from the 5th Language Technology Conference (LTC 2011), Poznan.
. 2014 Inducing grammars from IGT (Expanded version of Hellan & Beermann 2011). In Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics. Proceedings of LTC 2015, Poznan, Zygmunt Vetulani & Joseph Mariani (eds). Berlin: Springer.
. 2014b. Infinitive constructions in Norwegian in a comparative perspective. Presented at Syntax of the World’s Languages VI, Pavia.
. 2015. Relating ImagAct to online resources for text annotation and valency. Presented at Lablita Workshop, Firenze.
Hellan, Lars, Beermann, Dorothee, Bruland, Tore, Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp & Marimon, Montserrat. 2014
MultiVal – towards a multilingual valence lexicon. Presented at LREC 2014.
Hellan, Lars & Bruland, Tore. 2013. Constructing a multilingual database of verb valence. Paper presented at the 19th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2013, Oslo).
Hellan, L. & Dakubu, Mary Esther Krop. 2009. A methodology for enhancing argument structure specification. In Proceedings from the 4th Language Technology Conference (LTC 2009), Poznan.
Hellan, Lars & Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp. 2010: Identifying Verb Constructions Cross-Linguistically. Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin 6.3. Legon: Linguistics Dept., University of Ghana. <[URL]>
. 2013. The Construction Labeling system (CL) in the creation of complete, cross-linguistic valence‑ and construction repositories. Presented at ALT 10, Leipzig.
Herbst, Thomas & Götz-Votteler, Katrin (eds). 2007. Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kay, Paul. 2010. The limits of construction grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Lødrup, Helge. 1999. Linking and optimality in the Norwegian presentational construction. Ms, Stanford CA.
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Comrie, Bernard (eds). 2015. Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Michaelis, Laura A. Forthcoming. Sign based construction grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Nordgård, Torbjørn. 1998. Norwegian Computational Lexicon (NorKompLeks). In Proceedings of NODALIDA 98, Oslo.
Ogie, Ota. 2010. Using an online tool for the documentation of Edo language. In Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop, ACL 2010, 109–112, Uppsala, 15–16 July. Association for Computational Linguistics. <[URL]>
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Shluinsky, Andrey. 2013. ‘Take’ serial verb constructions in Kwa: An intra-genetic typology. Paper presented at ALT 10, Leipzig.
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2011. Typological Variation in Grammatical Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig. <[URL]>
