Cover not available

In:Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In honor of Janez Orešnik
Edited by Franc Lanko Marušič and Rok Žaucer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 236] 2016
► pp. 193–220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The left periphery of multiple wh-questions in Slovenian

 | University of Nova Gorica
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.236.09mis
In this paper I focus on multiple wh-questions in Slovenian and argue for an analysis in which wh-phrases move to the extended left periphery of the sentence. Assuming the Cartographic approach, I consider the order of wh-phrases in Slovenian multiple wh-questions, which was previously described as free, e.g. Golden (1997). While I confirm that the order of wh-phrases in the left periphery is generally free, I show that there are some exceptions, e.g. zakaj ‘why’ and kako ‘how’ tend to precede other wh-phrases. In addition, I show that the order of wh-phrases with respect to focus and topic phrases is free, but that one wh-phrase needs to appear in a clause initial position for a question to get a true wh-question reading. Based on this, I propose that the clause initial wh-phrase moves to the Interrogative Projection, in the sense of Rizzi (2001a), and the remaining wh-phrases to Wh-Projections. Crucially, because wh-movement is not restricted by a requirement on chains, cf. Krapova & Cinque (2005), the order of wh-phrases is free.
References (33)
References
Aboh, Enoch O. & Pfau, Roland. 2011. What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 91–124. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Carl L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of language 6: 197–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351−383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Topicalization, focalization, lexical insertion, and scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 613–638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai Shen. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. Studies in Linguistics 2: 42–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. A phase-based approach to Russian free word order. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2010. Semantic type effects on crossing movement in German. Language and Logos: Studies in Theoretical and Computational Linguistics 72: 48–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Aäussler, Jana & Weskott, Thomas. 2013. Constituent order in German multiple questions: Normal order and (apparent) anti-superiority effects. The Mind Research Repository (beta), Vol. 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golden, Marija. 1997. Multiple wh-questions in Slovene. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting, 1995, Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornisch, Natasha Kondrashova & Draga Zec (eds), 240−266. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & Postal, Paul. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana. 2004. Word order in Topic-Focus structures in the Balkan languages. In Romània Orientale XVII. Atti del IX convegno internazionale di studi sul sud-est europeo (Tirana, 30.08–3.09. 2004): 139–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 171–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1993. Grammar and Discourse Principles: Functional Syntax and GB Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela. 2005. On merging positions for arguments and adverbs in the Romance Mittelfeld. In Contributions to the thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa 2005, Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 105–128. Venice: Università Ca’Foscari Venezia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambova, Mariana. 2003. On the interaction of multiple (non) wh-fronting and multiple Topicalization in Bulgarian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(1): 127–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana & Stegovec, Adrian. 2012. On the syntax of ditransitive sentences in Slovenian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59(1–2): 177–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Roland. 2004. Superiority effects in Russian, Polish and Czech: Judgments and Grammar. Ms, University of Leipzig & University of Regensburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mišmaš, Petra. 2014. Multiple wh-fronting can be optional too. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: the McMaster Meeting 2013, Cassandra Chapman, Olena Kit & Ivona Kučerová (eds), 225–244. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. On the Optionality of Wh-fronting in a Multiple Wh-fronting Language. PhD dissertation, University of Nova Gorica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001a. On the position ―Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to L. Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. Relativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Martin Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 89–110. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojina, Nina. 2011. The Syntactic Structures of Russian Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445−501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela. 2011. Where’s ‘Why’? Linguistic inquiry 42(4): 651–669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soare, Gabriela. 2007. A cross-linguistic typology of question formation and the antisymmetry hypothesis. Generative Grammar in Geneva 5: 107–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur. 1998. On Wh-fronting is Russian. In Proceedings of NELS 28, Pius N. Tamanji & Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds), 453–467. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(3): 589–638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože. 2004. Slovenska slovnica (Slovenian grammar). Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue