Cover not available

In:Finiteness Matters: On finiteness-related phenomena in natural languages
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 231] 2016
► pp. 257–286

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Word order and finiteness in acquisition

A study of Norwegian and English Wh-questions

ORCiD logo with link | UiT – The Arctic University of Norway
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.231.09wes
Children acquiring languages such as English, German or Dutch typically go through a phase where they produce non-finite root clauses, often referred to as the Optional Infinitive (OI) stage. But there is a difference between English on the one hand and the other Germanic languages on the other with respect to the occurrence of non-finite wh-questions: while there is a high number of OIs in English in this context, non-finite wh-questions are virtually non-existent in child data of e.g. German or Swedish. This is often argued to be due to the early setting of the V2 parameter. Comparing Norwegian and English child data on wh-questions, this paper argues that there is no such parameter and that children instead are sensitive to fine syntactic distinctions in the input called micro-cues. On this view, both English and Norwegian have restricted V2 in wh-questions. The paper also shows that there is no causal correlation between finiteness morphology and word order in this context. Children’s non-finite root clauses are argued to generally be caused by a problem realizing auxiliaries, in both languages, and the difference between English and Norwegian is due to the type of verb required in wh-questions (auxiliaries vs. lexical verbs).
References (72)
References
Anderssen, Merete. 2006. The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Atkinson, Martin. 1998. Now, hang on a minute: Some reflections on emerging orthodoxies. In Clahsen (ed.), 451-499.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, Heike. 1993. Temporal Reference in German Child Language: Form and Function of Early Verb Use. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the absence of morphological cues: evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Proceedings from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Peter Svenonius, Anne Dahl & Marit R. Westergaard (eds). Nordlyd 31(3): 573-588.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. What’s the better move? On verb placement in Standard and Northern Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 153-188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The degree of verb movement in embedded clauses in three varieties of Norwegian. In Scandinavian Dialect Syntax 2005, Kristine Bentzen & Øystein A. Vangsnes (eds). Nordlyd 34: 127-146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berk, Stephanie. 2003. Why ‘why’ is different? In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Barbara Beachley, Amanda Brown & Frances Conlin (eds),127-137. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, Elma. 2007. Modality, infinitives, and finite bare verbs in Dutch and English child language. Language Acquisition 14(1): 75-113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129-167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two heads aren't always better than one. Syntax 1(1): 37-71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute. 1999. Icelandic plus English: Language Differentiation and Functional Categories in a Successively Bilingual Child. PhD dissertation, University of Durham.
Boser, Katharina, Lust, Barbara C., Santelmann, Lynn & Whitman, John. 1992. The syntax of V2 in early child German grammar: The Strong Continuity Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Northeastern Linguistic Society 22: 51-66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24: 79-121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition, Suzanne Flynn & Wayne O’Neil (eds), 47-75. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Muysken, Pieter. 1986. The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners – A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2(2): 93-119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 5(1): 1-29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), 181-223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Haan, Germen. 1987. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In Germen de Haan & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar, 15-30. Dordrecht: ICG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil & Simonsen, Hanne Gram. 2001. The Norwegian verb. In A Cognitive Approach to the Verb: Morphological and Constructional Perspectives, Hanne Gram Simonsen & Rolf Theil Endresen (eds), 73-94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum. 2009. Finiteness: The haves and the have-nots. In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141], Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds), 357-390 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1996. Acquisition of Italian interrogatives. In Clahsen (ed.), 241-270.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. An excursion into interrogatives in Early English and Italian. In The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics, Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 105-128, Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Thornton, Rosalind & Wexler, Ken. 1995. Negation in children’s questions: The case of English. In BUCLD 19: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Dawn MacLaughlin & Susan McEwen (eds), 228-240. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Tony & Wexler, Ken. 1996. The optional-infinitive stage in child English: Evidence from negation. In Clahsen (ed.), 1-42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Hyams, Nina. 1998. Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106: 81-112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, David & Thompson, William. 1996. Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the Modal Hypothesis. Language 72(1): 97-120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics28: 1407-1448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög. 1999. Non-finite root clauses in Swedish child language. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 63: 105-150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Input and output: Sentence patterns in child and adult Swedish. In The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 33], Gunlög Josefsson, Christer Platzack & Gisela Håkansson (eds), 95–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Bellugi[-Klima], Ursula. 1966. Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Psycholinguistic Papers, John Lyons & Roger J. Wales (eds), 183-208. Edinburgh: EUP. Also published in Lust, Barbara C. & Foley, Claire (eds). 2004. First Language Acquisition: The Essential Readings, 344-366. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William & Labov, Teresa. 1978. Learning the syntax of questions. In Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language: Formal and Experimental Approaches, Robin N. Campbell & Philip T. Smith (eds). New York NY: Plenum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, Donna. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, John Archibald (ed.), 102-129. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasser, Ingeborg. 1997. Finiteness in Adult and Child Language. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.
Lightfoot, David. 2002. Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 1994. Getting FAT: Finiteness, agreement and tense in early grammars. In Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development, [ Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 7], Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), 89-129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol. 2: The Database, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin. 1995. Syntax at age two: Cross-linguistic differences. In Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26], Carson T. Schütze, Jennifer B. Ganger & Kevin Broihier (eds), 325-382. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plunkett, Kim & Strömqvist, Sven. 1990. The Acquisition of Scandinavian Languages. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poeppel, David & Wexler, Ken. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69: 1-33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–425.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1992. The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), 23-62. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. The syntax of questions in child English. Journal of Child Language 21: 211-236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1993/94. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3(4): 371-393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63-90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Remarks on early null subjects. In The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics, Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 269-292. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom. 1999. Universal Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3), 169-186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard Wolfgang. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-drop [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M. 2000. Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What children do know?’ Journal of Child Language 27: 157-181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The development of inversion in wh-questions: A reply to Van Valin. Journal of Child Language 30: 197-212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santelmann, Lynn. 1995. The Acquisition of Verb Second Grammar in Child Swedish: Continuity of Universal Grammar in WH-questions, Topicalizations and Verb Raising. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 2004. The acquisition of Swedish wh-questions. In Gunlög Josefsson, Christer Platzack and Gisela Håkansson (eds.), The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar, 261-307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snyder, William. 2007. Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stromswold, Karin. 1990. Learnability and the Acquisition of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Theakston, Anna L., Lieven, Elena V.M., Pine, Julian M. & Rowland, Caroline F. 2001. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language 28: 127-152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, Rosalind. 2008. Why continuity? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 107-146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein A. 2005. Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 187-226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2002. The development of subject-auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: An alternative analysis. Journal of Child Language 29: 161-175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verrips, Maaike & Weissenborn, Jürgen. 1992. Routes to verb placement in early German and French: The independence of finiteness and agreement. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen Meisel (ed.), 283-331. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldmann, Christian. 2008. Input och output: Ordföljd i svenska barns huvudsatser och bisatser (Input and Output: Word Order in Swedish Children’s Main and Embedded Clauses). PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
Westergaard, Marit R. 2003. Word order in wh-questions in a North Norwegian dialect: Some evidence from an acquisition study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(1): 81-109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2008. Acquisition and change: On the robustness of the triggering experience for word order cues. Lingua 118(12): 1841-1863. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure and Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1): 49-79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009c. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5): 1023-1051. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit & Bentzen, Kristine. 2010. Word order and finiteness in the acquisition of English and Norwegian wh-questions. In BUCLD 34: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol 2, Katie Franich, Kate M. Iserman & Lauren L. Keil (eds), 457-467. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation. In Verb Movement, David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 305-350. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge Representation and Processing, Antonella Sorace, Caroline Heycock & Richard Shillock (eds). Special issue of Lingua , 23-79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wijnen, Frank, Kempen, Masja & Gillis, Steven. 2001. Root infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input? Journal of Child Language 28(3): 629-660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(3): 203-233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Poletto, Cecilia
2019. More than one way out. Linguistic Variation 19:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2014. Linguistic variation and micro-cues in first language acquisition. Linguistic Variation 14:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue