In:Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 461–478
Re-evaluating exocentricity in word-formation
Published online: 29 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.15bau
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.15bau
The distinction between endocentric and exocentric is usually taken as an important semantic factor in classifying compounds. But the same division does not appear to be used in classifying derivatives. This may be because exocentricity has no obvious correlates in derivation; but it is argued here that its correlates in compounding are illusory, and that there are alternative, and probably more explanatory, ways of dealing with exocentrics.
References (42)
2010. The typology of exocentric compounding. In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds),167–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bauer, Laurie & Huddleston, Rodney 2002. Lexical word-formation. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 1621–1721. Cambridge: CUP.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Behrens, Leila 2002. Structuring of word meaning II: Aspects of polysemy. In Lexicologie/Lexicology, Vol 1, D. Alan Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job & Peter Rolf Lutzeier (eds), 319–337. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Benczes, Réka 2006. Creative Compounding in English. The Semantics of Methaphorical and Metonymical Noun-noun Combinations [Human Cognitive Processing 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2009. Compounding and construction morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 201–216. Oxford: OUP.
Chomsky, Noam 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn.
Coseriu, Eugene 1977. Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, Herbert E. Brekle & Dieter Kastovsky (eds), 46–61. Bonn: Grundmann.
Cuyckens, Hubert & Zawada, Britta (eds). 2001. Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 177]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fabb, Nigel 1998. Compounding. In The Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 66–83. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gragg, Gene B. 1984. Polysemy and derivation: areal-diachronic perspectives. In Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, David Testen, Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds), 131–142. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Schwarze, Christoph. 2013. Italian V+N compounds, inflectional features and conceptual structure. Morphology 23: 325–350.
Jakobson, Roman 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–288.
Kenesei, István 2013. The role of creativity in the cognitive turn in linguistics. International Review of Pragmatics 5: 271–292.
Koskela, A. & Murphy, M. Lynne. 2006. Polysemy and homonymy. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9, Keith Brown (ed.), 742–744. Oxford: Elsevier.
Lehrer, Adrienne 1990. Polysemy, conventionality and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics 1–2: 207–246.
2003. Polysemy in derivational affixes. In Trends in Linguistics: Polysemy. Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language, Brigitte Nehrlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman & David D. Clarke (eds), 217–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Love, Catherine E. 1985. Collins Giunti Marzocco Concise Italian- English English-Italian Dictionary. Firenze: Giunti & Glasgow: HarperCollins.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2009. The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 34–53. Oxford: OUP.
Scalise, Sergio & Fábregas, Antonio. 2010. The head in compounding. In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 109–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene. 2010. Why compounding? In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (40)
Cited by 40 other publications
Koutsoukos, Νikos & Angela Ralli
Bowie, Jill & Gergana Popova
Depraetere, Ilse & Anastasios Tsangalidis
Dorgeloh, Heidrun & Anja Wanner
Duffley, Patrick
Egan, Thomas
Hellmuth, Sam & Ian Cushing
Herbst, Thomas
Hilpert, Martin
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
Kaltenböck, Gunther
Kortmann, Bernd
König, Ekkehard
Lohndal, Terje & Liliane Haegeman
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
Siemund, Peter
Spencer, Andrew
Spencer, Andrew
Sprouse, Jon & Carson Schütze
Taylor, John R
Thomas, Margaret
Wallis, Sean
Bauer, Laurie
BAUER, LAURIE
Bauer, Laurie
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
