In:Pejoration
Edited by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer and Heike Wiese
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 228] 2016
► pp. 41–74
How do evaluative derivational meanings arise? A bit of Geforsche and Forscherei
Published online: 31 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.228.03dam
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.228.03dam
We investigate the rise of pejorative functions in word formation in a diachronic corpus-based case study on the German derivation patterns Ge-e and -(er)ei. Both patterns derive action nouns, adding the feature ‘frequentative’ and implying a dismissive/ironic attitude towards the action referred to. Our corpus data from 1350–1850 suggest that incipient pejorative derivational meanings are heavily based on utterance contexts and base types with derogative connotation. Diachronically, they conventionalize to a certain degree. However, – as implicature tests (especially calculability) show for -(er)ei and Ge-e –, they need not become a part of affix semantics. This lack of emancipation may be due to the high pragmatic productivity of pejorative contexts in reference to frequentative actions, leading to +> ‘annoyance’ in the first place, but also precluding the critical mass of neutral contexts/bases needed to prove emancipation.
Keywords: derivation, diachronic corpus study, German, nominalisation, pejoration, word formation
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Meibauer, Jörg
Bick, Eckhard
Werner, Martina
Peters, Joachim, Natalie Dykes, Maria Heckel & Christoph Ostgathe
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
