In:Cyclical Change Continued
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227] 2016
► pp. 93–112
An analytic-synthetic spiral in the history of English
Published online: 9 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227.04szm
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227.04szm
Drawing on techniques familiar from quantitative morphological typology (Greenberg 1960), this contribution marshals usage- and frequency-based, aggregative measures of grammatical analyticity and syntheticity to profile the history of grammatical marking in English between circa AD 1100 and AD 1900, tapping into the Penn Parsed Corpora of Historical English series. Results indicate that the post-Old English period is clearly not characterized by a linear drift towards more analyticity and less syntheticity. Instead, analyticity was on the rise until the end of the Early Modern English period, but declined subsequently; the reverse is true for syntheticity. In terms of typological analyticity-syntheticity coordinates, 20th century English texts are actually fairly similar to 12th and 13th century English texts. I suggest that this historical pattern can be interpreted in terms of a Gabelentz-type spiral.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Cichosz, Anna
Walkden, George
2024. Parataxis and hypotaxis in the history of English. In Keys to the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 363], ► pp. 10 ff.
Zehentner, Eva
Zehentner, Eva
KAKU, MOKAN, MIREI SHIROYANAGI, HARUHI MIZUMA & RYOKO FUJITA
Marukatat, Rangsipan
Sinnemäki, Kaius
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Maria Michaelis
2017. Analytic and synthetic. In Language variation – European perspectives VI [Studies in Language Variation, 19], ► pp. 3 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
