In:Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 229–250
Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery
Clitic Left Dislocation and Hanging Topic
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.10gio
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.10gio
In this work I consider the properties of Clitic Left Dislocation (CLLD) and Hanging Topic (HT) in Italian. Rizzi (1997) proposed that the syntactic space pertaining to the complementizer must be conceived of as a layer, i.e. as a set of hierarchically ordered projections, including those for contrastive focus and topics. In the literature following this hypothesis, a focused phrase is argued to be moved, whereas topics such as CLLD and HT are analyzed as base generated in the left periphery. Here I argue that their unmoved status follows from their very special syntax, given that the heads projecting the phrases where they are hosted belong to a peculiar category, i.e. they are prosody- oriented heads. Prosody-oriented heads are not associated to a lexical content, but to a phonological one, i.e. are read off at the interface with phonology as instructions for the assignment of prosodic values. The properties and distribution of CLLD and HT will be shown to follow from this hypothesis.
References (28)
Burton-Roberts, Noel, 2006. Parentheticals. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed), 179-182. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52-75. Oxford: OUP.
. 2008. Two types of nonrestrictive relative clauses. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 99-137. <[URL]>
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yadranka (eds). 2007. Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dehé, Nicole. 2009. Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 45: 569-615.
Döring, Sandra. 2007. Quieter, faster, lower and set off by pauses? In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yadranka Kavalova (eds), 285-307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2004. Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality: A comparative analysis of left and right topic constructions in Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Mahne & Petra Sleeman (eds), 98-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 87-116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2014. Prosodic signals as syntactic formatives in the left periphery In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque, Yoshio Endo (eds), 161-188. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.
. 2015. Integrated parentheticals in quotations and free indirect discourse. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics. Interdisciplinary Studies, Alessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds). Dordrecht: Springer.
. To appear. Epistemic adverbs, the prosody-syntax interface and the theory of phases,
Proceedings of the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages
, NYU, 2014.
Iatridou, Sabine. 1995. Clitics and island effects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 11-30.
Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. On the interpretation of three-dimensional trees. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 261-281.
Potts, Christopher. 2002. The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623-689.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2015. The Interaction of Focus and Giveness in Italian Clause Structure. Oxford: OUP.
Selkirk, Lisa. 2005. Comments on intonational phrasing. In Prosodies, Sonia Frota, Marina Vigario & Maria Joao Freitas (eds), 11-58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Villalba, Xavier. 1998. Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Language, Olga Fullana & Francesc Roca (eds), 227-241. Girona: Universitat de Girona.
de Vries, Mark. 2007. Invisible constituents? In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yadranka Kavalova (eds), 203-235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (26)
Cited by 26 other publications
Cinque, Guglielmo
2025. ‘Frankly’, and the syntacticization of speech acts. In The Ziggurat of Grammar [Language Faculty and Beyond, 20], ► pp. 478 ff.
Munaro, Nicola
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
Syed, Saurov & Andrew Simpson
Corr, Alice
Cruschina, Silvio
Neagu, Anda
Badan, Linda
Cardinaletti, Anna
2020. Left- and Right-Dislocation and the speaker’s perspective. In Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 260], ► pp. 87 ff.
Giorgi, Alessandra
Giorgi, Alessandra
Giorgi, Alessandra
2018.
Ma non era rosso? (But wasn’t it red?). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 14], ► pp. 69 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
