Cover not available

In:Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 321–342

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Intervention effects in the spontaneous production of relative clauses in (a)typical language development of French children and adolescents

Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.15ham
The present study investigates spontaneous production of 4 groups of typically developing French speaking children (TD6, TD8, TD11, TD14) and a group of French children with specific language impairment (SLI) with focus on the production of types of relative clauses and the occurrence of intervening elements and avoidance strategies. We provide data complementing much of Adriana Belletti’s recent work in that intervention is avoided in the choice of the relative subject, frequently a pronoun and animate, and because we do not find subject relatives with passive. We argue that investigation of spontaneous speech naturally controls for discourse effects and allows to uncover patterns in the feature specifications of relative heads and subjects that are relevant for theoretical descriptions of intervention.
References (57)
References
Adani, Flavia. 2011. Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language 38(1): 141–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Some notes on the acquisition of relative clauses: New data and open questions. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 6–13. CISCL Press: University of Siena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adani, Flavia, Forgiarini, Matteo, Guasti, Maria Teresa & van der Lely, Heather. 2013. Number dissimilarities facilitate the comprehension of relative clauses in children with (Grammatical) specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 40: 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arosio, Fabrizio, Guasti, Maria Teresa & Stucchi, Natale. 2011. Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40: 137–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2014. Notes on passive object relatives. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol.9, Peter Svenonius (ed), 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Chesi, Cristiano. 2011. Relative Clauses from the input: syntactic considerations on a corpus-based analysis of Italian. Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers) Vol.4, 5–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Contemori Carla. 2010. Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, Joao Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas (eds), 39–52. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique, & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10): 1053–1069. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Ways of avoiding intervention: Some Thoughts on Object relatives, Passive and Control. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini & Robert C. Berwick (eds), 115–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt, Silke, Kidd, Evan, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The discourse basis of relativisation: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 539–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Courtney Leigh. 2012. Early Word Order and Animacy. Groningen: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics, 104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contemori, Carla. 2011. The Comprehension and Production of Relative Clauses in Italian across Populations and in Different Modalities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Siena.
Correa, Leticia M. 1995. An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 183–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronel-Ohayon, Stéphany. 2004. Etude Longitudinal d’une Population d’Enfants Francophones Présentant un Trouble Specific du Developpement du Langage: Aspects Syntaxiques. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Delage, Hélène. 2008. Evolution de l’Hétérogénéité Linguistique chez les Enfants Sourds Moyen Lègers: Etude de la Complexité Morphosyntaxique. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tours.
Delage, Hélène, Monjauze, Cecile, Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurie. 2008. Relative clauses in atypical acquisition of French. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2007, Anna Gavarró & Maria J. Freitas (eds), 166–176. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael. 2005. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81(4): 882–906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66: 297–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, Ulrich, Segui, Juan & Mehler, Jacques. 1980. Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 328–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Gvion, Aviah. 2003. Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation: A dissociation between semantic and phonological encoding. Brain and Language 86: 23–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31: 661–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Szterman, Ronit. 2006. Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11: 56–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68: 1–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds), 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodluck, Helen. 2005. D(iscourse)-linking and question formation: comprehension effects in children and Broca’s aphasics. In UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation, Anna Maria Di Scullio (ed). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Object extraction is not subject to child relativized minimality. Lingua 120(6): 1516–1521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodluck, Helen & Tavakolian, Susan. 1982. Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition 11: 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Johnson, Marcus. 2001. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27(6): 1411–1423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grillo, Antonino. 2008. Generalized Minimality: Syntactic Underspecification in Broca`s Aphasia. Utrecht: LOT dissertations.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa & Cardinaletti, Anna. 2003. Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15: 47–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa & Shlonsky, Ur. 1995. The acquisition of French relative clauses reconsidered. Language Acquisition 4(4): 257–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Håkansson, Gisela & Hansson, Kristina. 2000. Comprehension and production of relative clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language 27: 313–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamann, Cornelia. 2006. Speculations about Early Syntax: The production of Wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5: 143–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamann, Cornelia & Abed Ibrahim, Lina. In preparation. Computational complexity and sentence repetition in German.
Hamann, Cornelia, Tuller, Laurice, Monjauze, Cécile, Delage, Hélène & Henry, Célia. Heather Caunt-Nulton2007. (Un)successful subordination in French-speaking children and adolescents with SLI. Proceedings of BUCLD31 , , Samantha Kulatilake & I-hao Woo (eds), 286–297. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurice. In revision. Genuine vs. superficial relatives in French: The depth of embedding factor.
Jakubowicz, Celia. 2004. Is movement costly? The grammar and the processor in language acquisition, Paper presented at JEL 2004, University of Nantes.
. 2005. The language faculty: (Ab)normal development and interface constraints, Paper presented at the GALA conference, University of Siena, September 8–10 2005.
Kidd, Evan, Brandt, Silke, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael. 2007. Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(6): 860–897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 1990. Predication, WH-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 1: 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. The acquisition of relative clauses: Movement or no movement? Language Acquisition 5(2): 65–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mak, Willem M., Vonk, Wietske & Schriefers, Herbert. 2002. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 4: 50–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 5: 466–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Memory & Cognition 31: 170–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, Rama & Friedmann, Naama. 2006. The production of relative clauses in SLI: a window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 8: 364–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed), 223–251.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Locality. Lingua 130: 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move Dissolves in to Merge. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Geneva.
Stavrakaki, Stavroula. 2001. Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in Specifically Language Impaired and Normally Developing Greek children. Brain and Language 77: 419–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuller, Laurice, Henry, Célia., Sizaret, Eva & Barthez, Marie-Anne. 2012. SLI at adolescence: Avoiding complexity. Applied Psycholinguistics 33: 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Lely, Heather. 1998. SLI in children: Movement, Economy, and Deficits in the Compuational-syntactic System. Language Acquisition 7: 161–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volpato, Francesca. 2012. The comprehension of relative clauses by hearing and hearing-impaired, cochlear-implanted children: the role of marked number features. In Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn IV Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, Sandrine Ferré, Philippe Prévost, Laurice Tuller & Rasha Zebib (eds), 306–329. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubin, David A. 1979. Discourse function of morphology: the focus system in German. In Syntax and Semantics. Volume 12. Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed), 469–504. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zurif, Edgar B. & Caramazza, Alfonso. 1976. Linguistic structures in aphasia: Studies in syntax and semantics. In Studies in Neurolinguistics (Vol. 2), Haiganoosh Whitaker & Harry A. Whitaker (eds), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sukenik, Nufar
2025. Relative clause production abilities of Hebrew-speaking children with ASD. Language Acquisition 32:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sukenik, Nufar, Eléonore Morin, Naama Friedmann, Philippe Prevost & Laurice Tuller
2021. Coconuts and curtain cakes: The production of wh-questions in ASD. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 6 DOI logo
Delage, Hélène & Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder
2019. Syntax and working memory in typically-developing children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 10:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Sukenik, Nufar & Naama Friedmann
2018. ASD Is Not DLI: Individuals With Autism and Individuals With Syntactic DLI Show Similar Performance Level in Syntactic Tasks, but Different Error Patterns. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Karssenberg, Lena, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. ‘Il n’y a que Superman qui porte le slip par-dessus le pantalon’ – les clivées enil n’y a que x qui. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02009 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue