Cover not available

In:Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 163–180

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Exhaustivity operators and fronted focus in Italian

ORCiD logo with link
ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.08del
In this contribution we present an original analysis of Fronted Focus in Italian (contrastive/corrective focus in the terminology of Belletti 2004), based on the insight that Fronted Focus can be decomposed into Contrast and the Exhaustivity Operator involved in the computation of grammaticalized implicatures. We argue that the different varieties of alleged Contrastive Focus in Italian are amenable to an analysis according to which the trigger for movement is an attracting Q-feature in the clausal left-periphery, as with focus-movement in Hungarian. The difference between Italian and Hungarian can be derived from the properties of lexical endowment of the Exhaustivity Operator Exh, together with the fact that the latter ‘associates’ with Focus in Hungarian and with Contrast in Italian.
References (27)
References
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The CP of clefts. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 191–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina. 2013. On focus movement in Italian. In Information Structure and Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-Gonzáles & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano 2012. Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Christopher Piñon (ed.), 1–18. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano. 2008. On the syntax/prosody interface: An analysis of the prosodic properties of postfocal material in Italian and its implications. Nanzan Linguistics 5: 13–42. Special issue.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The Syntax-prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano & Avesani, Cinzia. 2006. Focus contrastivo nella periferia sinistra della frase: Un solo accento, ma non solo un accento. In Teorie, modelli e sistemi di annotazione. Atti del II Convegno Nazionale AISV, Associazione Italiana di Scienze della Voce, Renata Savy & Claudia Crocco (eds), 1–30. Padova: EDK Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5): 511–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, Fox, Danny & Spector, Benjamin. 2010. Hurford’s constraint and the theory of scalar implicatures. Evidence for embedded implicatures. Ms. Harvard University, MIT and Institut Jean-Nicod.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus informational focus. Language 74: 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölz, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles Leonard. 1973. Questions in Montague Grammar. Foundations of Language 10: 42–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia. 2010. Discourse features, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua 120: 1346–1369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikel im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In The Architecture of Focus, Valerie Molnar & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Titov, Elena, van de Koot, Hans & Vermeulen, Reiko. 2009. A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 15–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left-periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 2004. On embedded implicatures. Journal of Cognitive Science 5: 107–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Embedded implicatures and experimental constraints: A reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla. Semantics and Pragmatics 3(2): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The computation of scalar implicatures: Pragmatic, lexical or grammatical? Language and Linguistics Compass, 36–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 1990. Focusing and backgrounding operators. In Discourse Particles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 37–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torregrossa, Jacopo. 2012. Encoding Topic, Focus and Contrast. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Verona.
Vallduví, Enric & Vilkuna, Maria. 1998. On rheme and kontrast. In The Limits of Syntax [Syntax & Semantics 29], Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds), 79–108. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rizzi, Luigi & Giuseppe Samo
2022. Introduction: On the Role of Romance in Cartographic Studies. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dal Farra, Chiara
2018. Towards a Fine-Grained Theory of Focus. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue