In:Studies in Övdalian Morphology and Syntax: New research on a lesser-known Scandinavian language
Edited by Kristine Bentzen, Henrik Rosenkvist and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 221] 2015
► pp. 177–230
Get fulltext
The morphological expression of case in Övdalian
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 3.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 22 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.221.08sve
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.221.08sve
The purpose of this paper is to document and describe the case system of the most conservative variety of Övdalian still spoken (‘Traditional Övdalian,’ TÖ). The system is compared with the four-case system of Old Swedish (OS) and the three-case system of Classical Övdalian (CÖ) described by Levander (1909). I argue that TÖ distinguishes three cases, but in full noun phrases, only manifests a two-case system, where Dative case is opposed to a Direct case comprising nominative and accusative functions. Pronouns generally show a different alignment, distinguishing nominative from objective cases. I focus on the nominal suffixes, which distinguish gender, number, definiteness, and case, as well as declension class. I argue that TÖ nouns have only one suffix, where OS had three, and CÖ was in transition between two suffixes and one. I examine the patterns of syncretism, and suggest that some can be explained in terms of markedness cooccurrence restrictions, but not others. I also briefly discuss adnominal modifiers (determiners and adjectives).
References (52)
Åfarli, Tor Anders & Fjøsne, Eldfrid Haaker. 2012. Weak dative case in Norwegian dialect syntax. Studia Linguistica 66(2): 75–93.
Åkerberg, Bengt. 2000. Ulum Dalska Grammatik 2000. Ulum Dalska. [URL]
Baerman, Matthew. 2009. Case syncretism. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 219–230. Oxford: OUP.
Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt, Håkon Jahr, Ernst, Karker, Allan, Naumann, Hans-Peter & Teleman, Ulf (eds). 2002. The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Jonas, Dianne. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27(2): 195–236.
Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In New Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 69], Dieter Wanner & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds), 143–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 427–495. Oxford: OUP.
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Dahl, Östen & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2006. The resilient dative and other remarkable cases in Scandinavian vernaculars. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(1): 56–75.
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626–657.
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2002. The morphology of Old Nordic, II: Old Swedish and Old Danish. In Bandle, et al. (eds), Vol. 1, 925–939.
. 2003. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen, Øystein Alexander Vangsnes, Anders Holmberg & Lars-Olof Delsing (eds),11–64. Oslo: Novus.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Laake, Signe & Åfarli, Tor A. 2012. Dative case in Norwegian, Icelandic and Faroese: Preservation and non-preservation. Journal of Nordic Linguistics 35(3): 219–249.
. 2009. On the history of definiteness marking in Scandinavian. Journal of Linguistics 45(3): 617–639.
Garbacz, Piotr. 2010. Word Order in Övdalian: A Study in Variation and Change. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–449.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Terminology of case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.
Helgander, John. 1996. Mobilitet och språkförändring. Exemplet Övre Dalarna och det vidare perspektivet. Falun, Högskolan Dalarna. Rapport 1996: 3.
. 2005. Älvdalsmål i förändring – några reflektioner kring en fallstudie. In Rapport från Fuost konferensn um övdalskų/Första konferensen om älvdalska, Gunnar Nyström. Uppsala Universitet. [URL]
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1935. La catégorie des cas: Étude de grammaire générale, Vol. 1. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–288.
Lahiri, Aditi, Wetterlin, Allison & Jönsson-Steiner, Elisabet. 2005. Sounds definite-ly clitic: Evidence from Scandinavian tone. Lingue e linguaggio 2: 243–262.
Levander, Lars. 1909. Älvdalsmålet i dalarna: Ordböjning ock syntax. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söner.
Morén-Duolljá, Bruce. 2013. The prosody of Swedish underived nouns: No lexical tones required. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 40(1): 196–248.
Müller, Gereon. 2005. Syncretism and iconicity in Icelandic noun declensions: A distributed morphology approach. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 229–271.
Noyer, Ralf. 1992. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Nyström, Gunnar. 1964. Ett prov på Karlarvsmålet i älvdalen. Utskrift och översättning av bandinspelning jämte kommentarer. Ms, SOFI Uppsala ref. nr 25661.
Ringmar, Martin. 2005. Älvdalska – en önordisk språk ö på fastlandet? In Rapport från Fuost konferensn um övdalskų/Första konferensen om älvdalska, Gunnar Nyström (ed.). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet. [URL]
Sandøy, Helge. 2000. Vitnemål frå ein dativbrukar. In Dialekter og folkminnen. Hyllningsskrift till Maj Reinhammar den 17 maj 2000, Lennart Elmevik (ed.), 231–239.Uppsala: Sällskapet för svensk dialektologi.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Svenonius, Peter. 2008. The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP. In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds), 16–42. Oxford: OUP.
. To appear. Declension class and the Norwegian definite suffix. In The Morpho-Syntax Phonology Connection, Vera Gribanova & Stephanie Shih (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander
2015. The polyfunctionality of which in Övdalian. In Studies in Övdalian Morphology and Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 221], ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
