In:Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 83–110
The rise and fall of double agreement
A comparison between Carinthian and Kansas Bukovina Bohemian
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.220.04wra
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.220.04wra
This paper provides a comparative description and diachronic analysis of the syntactically conditioned 1st person plural subject agreement allomorphies that can be observed in the Bavarian varieties Carinthian and Kansas Bukovina Bohemian. It is shown that these occurrences of double agreement have to be analyzed as a result of cognitive selection procedures that operate during language acquisition ensuring the choice of the most specific forms and the most economical structures that are compatible with the Primary Linguistic Data. In Carinthian as well as in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian 1st person plural double agreement emerged from the reanalysis of cliticized 1st person plural subject pronouns as C-oriented agreement markers. But it has taken different developmental paths in the respective varieties. Whereas it has been fully restored after a partial loss in Carinthian, it disappeared almost entirely in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian. In both varieties the individual change of double agreement has brought about not only a specialization of verbal paradigms but also a considerable economization of syntactic derivations and representations.
References (47)
Abraham, Werner & Wiegel, Anko. 1993. Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In Dialektsyntax, Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds), 12–49. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
. 1993. Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology and the syntax of second position. Language 69: 68–98.
Axel, Katrin & Weiß, Helmut. 2011.
Pro-drop in the history of German – From Old High German to the modern dialects. In Null Pronouns, Melani Wratil & Peter Gallmann (eds), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boas, Hans C. 2002. The Texas German Dialect Project (TGDP). [URL] (4 June 2014).
. 2003. Tracing dialect death: The Texas German dialect project. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Julie Larson & Mary Paster (eds), 387–398. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Bücherl, Rainald & Keel, William D. 1996. The Catholic Bukovinians in Kansas and Their Bohemian German Dialect. In German Emigration from Bukovina to the Americas, William D. Keel & Kurt Rein (eds), 277–284.Lawrence KS: Max Kade Center for German-American Studies.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1992. On cliticization in Germanic languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 17: 65–99.
. 1999. Pronouns in Germanic and Romanic languages: An overview. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 33–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Christl-Sorcan, Astrid & Eller, Nicole. 2008.
Iazd muasst deitschbehmisch redn, ned des Englisch! Deutschböhmische Dialekte in Kansas und Minnesota. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 34: 58–76.
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345.
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eller, Nicole. 2006. Syntax des bairischen Basisdialekts im Böhmerwald. Regensburg: Regensburger Dialektforum.
Fuß, Eric 2004. Diachronic clues to pro-drop and complementizer agreement in Bavarian. In Diachronic Clues to Synchronic Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 72], Eric Fuß & Carola Trips (eds), 59–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. The Rise of Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fuß, Eric & Wratil, Melani. 2013. Der Nullsubjektzyklus. Etablierung und Verlust von Nullargumenten. In Sprachwandelvergleich, Jürg Fleischer & Horst Simon (eds),Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.
. 1997. Verb second, the split CP and null subjects. In Early Dutch Finite Clauses. GenGenP 4(2): 133–175.
Halle, Morris 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: PF: Papers At the Interface, Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang, & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP.
Keel, William. D. 1981. On dialect mixture: The case of Ellis County (Kansas) Volga-German. In Proceedings of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference 1981, Tina Bennett-Kastor (ed.), 320–325. Wichita.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Elsewhere in phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106.New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
. 1995. The Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–170. Oxford: OUP.
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.
Lightfoot, David. 1997. Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 253–272. Cambridge: CUP.
Lunte, Gabriele M. 2006. Besondere Dialektmerkmale der bairisch-deutschböhmischen Mundart von Ellis, Kansas, USA. In Sprachinselwelten – The World of Language Island, Nina Berend & Elisabeth Knipf-Komlósi (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Rein, Kurt. 1996. Bukovina on the eve of emigration. In German Emigration from Bukovina to the Americas, William D. Keel & Kurt Rein (eds), 37–44. Lawrence KS: Max Kade Center for German-American Studies.
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 1994. Konservative Nominalflexion und “klammerndes Verfahren” im Deutschen. In Funktionale Untersuchungen zur deutschen Nominal- und Verbalmorphologie, Klaus Michael Köpcke (ed.), 115–130. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Tišerová, Pavla. 2008. Tschechien. In Handbuch der deutschen Sprachminderheiten in Mittel- und Osteuropa, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Albrecht Plewnia & Claudia Maria Riehl (eds), 171–242. Tübingen: Narr.
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892. Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1: 333–436.
Weerman, Fred. 1989. The V2 Conspiracy. A Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Die Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2005. Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik (ZDL) 72(2): 148–166.
Wiesinger, Peter. 1989. Die Flexionsmorphologie des Verbums im Bairischen. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Wratil, Melani. 2013. Double agreement in the Alpine languages. In Synchrony and Diachrony. A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone-Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
