Cover not available

In:Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 2350

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (58)
References
Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Altmann, Hans. 1984. Das System der enklitischen Personalpronomina in einer mittel-bairischen Mundart. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 51(2): 191–211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 15–47. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. In press. Doubly-filled comp, wh head-movement, and derivational economy. Ms, Universität Konstanz.
Bayer, Josef & Brandner, Ellen. 2008. On wh-head-movement and the doubly-filled-comp filter. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 87–95. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Bader, Markus. 2007. On the syntax of prepositional phrases. In Interface and Interface Conditions, Andreas Späth (ed.), 157–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef, Bader, Markus & Meng, Michael. 2001. Morphological underspecification meets oblique case: Syntactic and processing effects in German. Lingua 111: 465–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandner, Eleonore. 2004. Head-movement in minimalism and V2 as force-marking. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 97–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bury, Dirk. 2002. Particles, V2 and the ungrammaticality of verb-initial structures. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 368–387.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1999. Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages: An overview. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk C. van Riemsdijk (ed.), 33–81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam A. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam A. & Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Complex wh-phrases don’t move: On the interaction between the split CP-hypothesis and the syntax of wh-movement. In The Complementizer Phase. Subjects and Operators, Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2011. Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Wh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 21–46. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2004. Münchhausen-style head movement and the analysis of verb second. In Three Papers on German Verb Movement, Ralf Vogel (ed.). Linguistics in Potsdam 22: 9–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Konfigurationalität. Untersuchungen zur Universalgrammatik am Beispiel des Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2010. Ā‑movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua 120(6): 1416–1435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004a. Economy, innovation, and prescriptivism: From spec to head and head to head. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7: 59–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgi, Doreen & Müller, Gereon. 2010. Noun-phrase structure by reprojection. Syntax 13: 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodall, Grant. 2005. Contraction. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 1, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 688–704. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther. 2012. Wh-movement as topic movement. In Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 7, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecila Poletto (eds), 55–68. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutch, Donald. 1992. Linking and intrusive r in English and Bavarian. In Language and Civilization: A Concerted Profusion of Essays and Studies in Honor of Otto Hietsch, Vol. 1, Claudia Blank (ed.), 555–611. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Nunes, Jairo & Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2006. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kathol, Andreas. 2000. Linear Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The distribution of declarative verb second in Germanic. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 175–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutz, Ulrich. 1997. Parasitic gaps und Vorfeldstruktur. In Zur Satzstruktur des Deutschen, Franz-Josef d‘Avis & Ulrich Lutz (eds). Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340(90): 55–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merkle, Ludwig. 1975[1984]. Bairische Grammatik, reprint, 2nd edn. München: Hugendubel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noth, Harald. 1993. Alemannisches Dialekthandbuch vom Kaiserstuhl und seiner Umgebung. Freiburg im Breisgau: Schillinger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry: 303–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortmann, Albert. 1998. Consonant epenthesis: Its distribution and phonological specification. In Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages, Wolfgang Kehrein & Richard Wiese (eds), 51–76. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric J. Reuland & Alice G.B. ter Meulen (eds.), 98*#x2013;129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfalz, Anton. 1918. Suffigierung der Personalpronomina im Donau-Bairischen [Sitzungsberichte 190]. Wien: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, philosophisch-historische Klasse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 1996. Attraktion, Tilgung und Verbposition. Zur diachronen und dialektalen Variation beim Relativpronomen im Deutschen. In Language Change and Generative Grammar [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 7], Ellen Brandner & Gisella Ferraresi (eds), 120–153. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1996. Germanic verb second – attract versus repel: On optionality, A-bar movement and the symmetrical/asymmetrical verb second hypothesis. In Deutsch – typologisch, Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonoun (eds), 92–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2004. On wh-clitics and wh-doubling in French and some North Eastern Italian dialects. Probus 16: 241–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Modern Studies in English, David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1985. Satzeinleitende Strukturen im Deutschen. Über COMP, Haupt- und Nebensätze, w-Bewegung und die Doppelkopfanalyse. In Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Werner Abraham (ed.), 271–311. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiepek, Josef. 1899. Der Satzbau der Egerländer Mundart. Prag: Verlag des Vereines für Geschichte der Deutschen in Böhmen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmeller, J. Andreas. 1872, 1877[2008]. Bayerisches Wörterbuch, 2 Vols. Reprint. München: Oldenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schönenberger, Manuela. 2006. A glimpse of doubly-filled COMPs in Swiss German. In Organizing Grammar: Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), 572–581. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steininger, Reinhold. 1994. Beiträge zu einer Grammatik des Bairischen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surány, Balázs. 2003. Head movement and reprojection. In Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae. Sectio Linguistica, Tomus XXVI: 313–342. Budapest: ELTE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein. 2005. Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 187–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. On two types of natural languages. Some consequences for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 27: 87–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Vom Nutzen der Dialektsyntax. In Morphologie und Syntax deutscher Dialekte und historische Dialektologie des Deutschen, Beiträge zum 1. Kongress der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen, Marburg/Lahn, 5.–8. März 2003, F. Patocka & P. Wiesinger (eds), 21–41, Wien: Edition Präsens.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Inflected complementizers in continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72: 148–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2009. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12: 49–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit & Vangsnes, Øystein. 2005. Wh-questions, V2, and the left periphery of three Norwegian dialect types. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8(1–2): 119–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Schallert, Oliver & Ermenegildo Bidese
2021. Doubly-filled COMPs in Alpine varieties. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 74:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
van Koppen, Marjo
2017. Complementizer Agreement. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lutz, Uli

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue