Cover not available

In:Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Aspects of Bavarian syntax

ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.220.01gre
References (39)
References
Barbiers, Sjef, Koeneman, Olaf, Lekakou, Marika & van der Ham, Margreet (eds). 2008. Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Doubly-filled comp, wh head-movement, and derivational economy. Ms, Konstanz University.
. 2013. Das W-Pronomen als Kopf. Handout Workshop Schweizerdeutsche Syntax , Annesso Cartesiano, Villa Salmi, Arezzo.
Bayer, Josef & Brandner, Eleonore. 2008. On wh-head-movement and the doubly-filled-COMP filter. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 87–95. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle. 2010. Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandner, Eleonore. 2012. Syntactic microvariation. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(2): 113–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2013. Null Subjects. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000a. Minimalist Inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 2001. The lower operator position with parasitic gaps. In Features and Interfaces in Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 222], Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén & Karon Zagona (eds), 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative … Concord?. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther. 2012. Wh-movement as topic movement. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 55–68. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. Satztypen und die linke/rechte Peripherie. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds), 652–679. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Double fronting in Bavarian left periphery. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West-Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1986. Verb projection raising, scope and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417–466.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric. 1993. Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation. In Dialektsyntax [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 5], Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes. 2008. History of German Negation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 118]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1983. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie. 1989. Zu System und Genese der nebensatzeinleitenden Konjunktionen im heutigen Bairischen. In Bayrisch-österreichische Dialektforschung. Würzburger Arbeitstagung 1986, Vol. I, Erwin Koller, Werner Wegstein & Norbert R. Wolf (eds), 264–282. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merkle, Ludwig. 1990. Bairische Grammatik, 4th edn. Munich: Hugendubel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 1999. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Mamuro. 2012. Sentence types and the Japanese right periphery. In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 147–175. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1994. Verb movement and the licensing of argumental Wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 335–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stechow, Armin & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Duplex negatio non semper affirmat. A theory of double negation. Linguistics 37(5): 819–846.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. On two types of natural languages. Some consequences for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 27(1): 87–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. A quantifier approach to negation in natural languages. Or why negative concord is necessary. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 125–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A question of relevance. Some remarks on standard languages. In What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? The Case of Innateness, Martina Penke & Anette Rosenbach (eds). Special issue of Studies in Language 28(3): 648–674, 680–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Inflected complementizers in continental West Germanic Dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72: 148–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. UG und syntaktische (Mikro-)Variation. In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand. Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 19], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 173–207. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. The Wackernagel position and complementizer agreement – The emergence of a syntactic particularity at the left edge of the German middle field. In The German Middle Field in a Comparative and Diachronic Perspective, Roland Hinterhölzl, Kristine Bentzen, Augustin Speyer & Luka Szucsich (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zehetner Ludwig 1985. Das bairische Dialektbuch. Unter Mitarbeit von Ludwig M. Eichinger, Reinhard Rascher, Anthony Rowley, & Christopher J. Wickham,München: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue