Cover not available

In:Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 183212

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (36)
References
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Zwarts, J. 2010. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 20, D. Lutz & N. Li (eds), 179–196. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ašić, T. 2008. Espace, Temps, Préposition. Droz: Genève.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In print. Les prépositions dans les constructions téliques et fonctionelles en français, en serbe et en bulgare. In Actes du Colloque DEAF2. University of Kragujevac.
Aurnague, M. 2004. À cet endroit vs. dans un tel endroit: Ce que à nous dit d’endroit et vice-versa. Langages 173: 34–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Les structures de l’espace linguistique: Regards croisés sur quelques constructions spatiales du Basque et du Français. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C. 1993. Definite possessives and discourse novelty. In Chicago Linguistic Society, 28: Papers from the Twenty-Eight Regional Meeting, Vol. 1, C. Canakis, G. Chan & J. Denton (eds), 26–41. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. Possessive weak definites.
Borillo, A. 1983. La détermination et la préposition de lieu à en français. In Détermination et Formalization [Linvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 23], X. Blanco, P.-A. Buvet & Z. Gavriilidou (eds), 85–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosch, P. 2010. Weak definites and German preposition-determiner contractions. Paper presented at Workshop Specificity from Theoretical and Empirical Points of View, Institut für Linguistik, Universität Stuttgart.
Carlson, G. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 413–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, G. & Sussman, R. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In Linguistic Evidence, S. Kepsar & M. Reis (eds), 71–85. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corblin, F. 1987. Indéfini, défini et démonstratif. Construction linguistique de la référence. Paris : Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Les formes de reprise dans le discours. Anaphores et chaînes de référence. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Défini et génitif: Le cas des définis défectifs. In Cahier Jean-Claude Milner, J.-M. Marandin (ed.), 19–54. Lagrasse: Editions Verdier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Représentation du discours et sémantique formelle. Introduction et applications au français [Collection linguistique nouvelle]. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Des définis para-intensionnels: être à l’hôpital, aller à l’école . Langue française 171(3): 55–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Weak definites as bound relational definites. Revue Linguistique de Vincennes 42: 91–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H. 2004. The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flaux, Nelly. 1992. Les syntagmes nominaux du type le fils d'un paysan: Référence définie ou indéfinie? Le Français Moderne 1: 113–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993 Les syntagmes nominaux du type le fils d'un paysan: Référence définie ou indéfinie? Le Français Moderne 2: 23–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furukawa, Naoyo. 1986. L’article et le problème de la référence en français. Tokyo: France Tosho.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefinitenes. A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kehler, A. & Shieber, S.M. 1997. Anaphoric dependencies in ellipsis. Computational Linguistics 23(3): 457–466.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, G. 2001. Déterminants indéfinis ou Quand les faibles jouent aux forts . In Détermination et Formalisation [Linguisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 23], X. Blanco, P.-A. Buvet & Z. Gavriilidou (eds), 195–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M. 2004. Structural features of language and language use. In Group Interaction in High Risk Environments, R. Dietrich & T. Michell Childress (eds), 141–164. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löbner, S. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4(4): 279–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, J.-C. 1982. Ordres et raisons de langue. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poesio, M. 1994. Weak definites. In Proceedings of Salt IV, M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (eds), 282–299. Ithaca NY: Cornell DMLL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, C. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 287–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanojević, V. 2010. O nekim aspektima referencijalnosti u francuskom i u srpskom jeziku. In Interdisciplinarnost i jedinstvo savremene nauke, Knjiga 4, tom 1, Pale: Univezitet u Istočnom Sarajevu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. De la référence définie en serbe par comparaison avec le français. In Les etudes françaises, aujourd’hui, 271–283. Belgrade: Faculté de Philologie de l’Université de Belgrade, Association de coopération culturelle Serbie-France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevanović, M. 1964. Savremeni Srpskohrvatski Jezik I. Beograd: Naučno delo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stvan, L.S. 1998. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Bare Singular Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.
Vandeloise, C. 1987. La préposition à et le principe d’anticipation. Langue française 76: 77–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 2011. Weak Definites and Generics. BA thesis, Universität Osnabrück.
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Ašić, Tijana, Tatjana Grujić & Marina Kebara
2024. Specific telic constructions with the preposition do in Serbian. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Pristini 54:3  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Ašić, Tijana, Tatjana Samardžija, Marija Simović, Frédéric Torterat, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Montébran, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux, G. Merminod & G. Philippe
2024. Les déterminants dans les circonstants d’atmosphère construits avec la préposition par. SHS Web of Conferences 191  pp. 12011 ff. DOI logo
Ašić, Tijana & Marija Simović
2024. Relations of simultaneity of prepositions in local and temporal usage. Bastina :62  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Hsiung, Hui-Ju
2023. Chinese Locative Expressions: Prepositions and Localizers. In Chinese Language Resources [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 49],  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Ašić, Tijana
2017. Spatial Deictic Expression in Serbian Ovde, Tamo, Tu; A New Approach. In Formal Models in the Study of Language,  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Corblin, Francis & Tijana Asic
2017. Une nouvelle approche de l’opposition ici/là et ovde/tu. Travaux de linguistique n° 72:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Schumacher, Petra B. & Hanna Weiland-Breckle

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue