In:Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 129–156
Predicate nominals in Papiamentu
a comparison with Brazilian Portuguese and other languages
Published online: 3 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219.06sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219.06sch
This paper presents a comparative analysis of number in predicate nominals in Papiamentu and Brazilian Portuguese. While Papiamentu predicate nominals do not show plural agreement when the subject is plural, Brazilian Portuguese shows agreement in spite of the fact that both languages allow number neutral bare count nouns to appear in argument position. Using tools from Distributed Morphology, we provide an analysis that can explain why number morphology is not always realized in determinerless predicate nominals. We argue that the variation between the two languages arises from a difference between their respective vocabulary items. Papiamentu plural marker -
nan
cannot behave as a simple agreement marker, because it contains an additional definite feature (Schmitt & Kester 2005; Kester & Schmitt 2007). In Brazilian Portuguese, however, overt morphological number marking is the result of agreement with the subject DP.
References (38)
den Besten, H. 1996. Associative DPs. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, C. Cremers & M. den Dikken (eds), 13–24, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bosque, I. 1996. Por qué determinados sustantivos no son sustantivos determinados. In El sustantivo sin determinación. La Ausencia de Determinante en la Lengua Española, I. Bosque (ed.). 13–120. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Carlson, G. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 413–457.
Doetjes, J. 1997. Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.The Hague: HAG [HIL Dissertations 32].
Dijkhoff, M. 1983. The process of pluralization in Papiamentu. In Studies in Caribbean Language, L.D. Carrington (ed.), 217–229. Trinidad: Society of Caribbean Linguistics.
Espinal, M.T. & McNally, L. 2009. Characterizing ‘have’ predicates and indefiniteness. In Proceedings of the IV NEREUS International Workshop [Arbeitspapier 124], M.T. Espinal, M. Leonetti & L. McNally (eds). Konstanz: University Konstanz.
Fernández Laborans, M.J. 1999. La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), 2357- 2460. Madrid: Real Academia Española, Colección Nebrija y Bello.
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kester, E.-P. 1996. The Nature of Adjectival Inflection. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Kester, E.-P. & Schmitt, C. 2007. Papiamentu and Brazilian Portuguese: A comparative study of bare nominals. In Noun Phrases in Creole languages: A Multi-faceted Approach [Creole Language Library 31], M. Baptista & J. Guéron (eds), 107–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kupferman, L. 1979. Les constructions Il est un médecin/ Cést un médecin: Essai de solution. Cahier de Linguistique 9: 131–164. Montréal: Press de l’Université du Québec.
. 1991. Structure événementielle de l’alternance un/Ø devant les noms humains attributs. Langages 101: 52–75.
Munn, A. & Schmitt, C. 2001. Bare nominals and the morphosyntax of number. In Current Issues in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 220], T. Satterfield, C. Tortora & D. Cresti (eds), 225–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nakanishi, K. & Tomioka, S. 2004. Japanese plurals are exceptional. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 113–140.
Naro, A.J. & Scherre, M.M.P. 2003. A trend study of number agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: Social dimensions. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 32. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Odijk, J. 1992. Uninflected adjectives in Dutch. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 9, R. Bok-Bennema & R. van Hout (eds), 197–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roy, A. 2006. Non-verbal Predications: A Syntactic Analysis of Predicational Copular Sentences. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Sauerland, U., Anderssen, J. & Yatsushiro, J. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In Linguistic Evidence, S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), 413–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scherre, M.M.P. & Naro, A.J. 1991. Marking in discourse: 'Birds of a feather'. Language Variation and Change 3: 23–32.
Schmitt, C. & Munn, A. 1999. Against the nominal mapping parameter: Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of NELS 29, P. Tamanji, M. Hirotani & N. Hall (eds), 339–353. University of Delaware.
. 2003. The syntax and semantics of bare arguments in Brazilian Portuguese. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 185–216.
Schmitt, C. & E.-P. Kester 2005. Bare nominals in Papiamentu and Brazilian Portuguese: An exo-skeletal approach. In Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics. Selected Proceedings of the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, R. Gess & E.J. Rubin (ed.), 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Swart, H. 2001. Weak readings of indefinites: Type shifting and closure. The Linguistic Review 18: 69- 96.
