Cover not available

In:Dependency Linguistics: Recent advances in linguistic theory using dependency structures
Edited by Kim Gerdes, Eva Hajičová and Leo Wanner
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 215] 2014
► pp. 207–228

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Dependencies over prosodic boundary tones in spontaneous spoken Hebrew

 | The Research Center for Innovation in Learning Technologies, The Open University of Israel
Published online: 1 October 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.215.10sil
The aim of the present study is to investigate two aspects of speech: suprasegmental characteristics and syntagmatic relations. More specifically, it focused on the segmentation role of prosody and its interface with the syntagmatic sequence. While certain prosodic boundary tones seem to break speech with correlation to syntactic phrasing, it was found that excessive elongated words are indeed prosodic breaks of various “strong” dependencies. Such a break is not due only to prosody or phonological rules, but can be attributed to the strength of syntagmatic relations (i.e. dependencies) between the elongated word and the word that precedes it, and between the elongated word and the following word. The findings suggest an encompassing approach to the prosody-syntax interface which says that through the elongated boundaries phenomenon, speakers and listeners are exposed to the tension between the prosodic strata and the syntactic strata of language, i.e. between a prosodic break and syntactic continuity. This tension occurs about 10%–18% of spontaneous Israeli Hebrew boundary tones.
References (37)
References
Anderson, S.R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, L. 2007. Antconc Version 3.2.1w. Center for English Language Education, Waseda University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. 2007. Linguistic analysis of spoken language: The case of French language. In Spoken Language Corpus and Linguistic Informatics: Contributions of Linguistics, Applied Linguistics, Computer Sciences, Y. Kawaguchi, S. Zaima & T. Takagaki (eds). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, K.E. & Miller, J.E. (eds). 1996. Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CoSIH-. The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew. [URL]
Cresti, E. & Moneglia, M. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danieli, M., Garrido, J.M., Moneglia, M., Panizza, A., Quazza, S. & Swert, M. 2004. Evaluation of consensus on the annotation of prosodic breaks in the Romance corpus of spontaneous speech ‘C-ORAL-ROM’. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) , 26–28. Lisboa.
Fraser, N.M. 1996. Dependency grammar. In Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories, K.E. Brown & J.E. Miller (eds), 71–75. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, N.M., Corbett, G.G. & McGlashan, S. 1993. Introduction. In Heads in Grammatical Theory, G.G. Corbett, N.M. Fraser & S. McGlashan (eds), 1–10. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, A. 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B., Maschler, Y. & Uhmann, S. 2006. A cross-linguistic study of self-repair in English, German, and Hebrew. Paper read at ICCA 2006 , May 12, Helsinki.
Goldberg, Y. 2011. Automatic Syntactic Processing of Modern Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva.
Goldberg, Y. & Elhadad, M. 2010. Easy first dependency parsing of Modern Hebrew. In Proceedings of the SPMRL-2010 – An NAACL/HLT workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages , June 5, Los Angeles CA.
Hudson, R.A. 1990. English Word Grammar. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Do we have heads in our minds? In Heads in Grammatical Theory, G.G. Corbett, N.M. Fraser & S. McGlashan (eds), 266–291. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Word grammar. In Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories, K.E. Brown & J.E. Miller (eds), 368–372. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izre’el, S. 2005. Intonation units and the structure of spontaneous spoken language: A view from Hebrew. Paper read at IDP05 – International Symposium on ‘Towards modeling the relations between prosody and spontaneous spoken discourse’ , Aix-en-Provence, France.
. 2010. The basic unit of language: A view from spoken Israeli Hebrew. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Afroasiatic Languages, 55–89. Tsukuba, Ibaraki: Tsukuba University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izre’el, S. & Mettouchi, A. Forthcoming. Representation of speech in CorpAfroAs: Transcriptional strategies and prosodic units. In CorpAfroAs: The Corpus of AfroAsiatic Languages. [URL]
Lacheret-Dujour, A. 2007. Prosodie-discours: Une interface à muiltiples facettes. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 7–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leipzig Glossing Rules (LGR), List of Standard Abbreviations [URL]
Maschler, Y. 2009. Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 181]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.A. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mertens, P. 2011. Prosodie, syntaxe, discours: autour d’une approche predictive. In Actes d’IDP 2009 ; Septembre 2009, H.-Y. Yoo & E. Delais-Roussarie (eds), 19–32. Paris.
Rosén, H.B. 1977. Contemporary Hebrew. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosta, A. 2006. Structural and distributional heads. In: Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure, K. Sugayama & R.A. Hudson (eds), 171–200. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SAMPA (Speech Assessment Methods Phonetic Alphabet). SAMPA for Hebrew. [URL]
Schneider, G. 1998. A Linguistic Comparison of Constituency, Dependency and Link Grammar. MA thesis, University of Zurich.
Selkirk, E. 1995. The Prosodic Structure of Function Words. [URL]
Silber-Varod, V. 2010. Phonological aspects of hesitation disfluencies. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010 , May 14–19, Chicago IL.
. 2011. The SpeeCHain Perspective: Prosodic-Syntactic Interface in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, The Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies, Tel Aviv University.
Steedman, M. 2001. Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31(4): 649–685. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, N. 1994. Dictionary of Hebrew Verbs: The Valence and Distribution of the Verb in Contemporary Hebrew. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press(in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugayama, K. & Hudson, R.A. (eds). 2006. Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, T. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Izre'el, Shlomo
2022. The syntax of existential constructions. Journal of Speech Sciences 11 ► pp. e022001 ff. DOI logo
Silber-Varod, Vered, Mária Gósy & Anat Lerner
2021. Is It a Filler or a Pause? A Quantitative Analysis of Filled Pauses in Hebrew. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12997], ► pp. 638 ff. DOI logo
Shor, Leon
2020. Reassessing the third person pronominal “copula” in spoken Israeli Hebrew. Linguistics 58:6 ► pp. 1807 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue