Cover not available

In:Dependency Linguistics: Recent advances in linguistic theory using dependency structures
Edited by Kim Gerdes, Eva Hajičová and Leo Wanner
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 215] 2014
► pp. 33–52

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Delimitation of information between grammatical rules and lexicon

 | Charles University in Prague
 | Charles University in Prague
Published online: 1 October 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.215.02pan
The present paper contributes to the long-term linguistic discussion on the boundaries between grammar and lexicon by analyzing four related issues from Czech. The analysis is based on the theoretical framework of Functional Generative Description (FGD), which has been elaborated in Prague since 1960s. First, the approach of FGD to the valency of verbs is summarized. The second topic, concerning dependent content clauses, is closely related to the valency issue. We propose to encode the information on the conjunction of the dependent content clause as a grammatical feature of the verb governing the respective clause. Thirdly, passive, resultative and some other constructions are suggested to be understood as grammatical diatheses of Czech verbs and thus to be a part of the grammatical module of FGD. The fourth topic concerns the study of Czech nouns denoting pair body parts, clothes and accessories related to these body parts and similar nouns. Plural forms of these nouns prototypically refer to a pair or typical group of entities, not just to many of them. Since under specific contextual conditions the pair/group meaning can be expressed by most Czech concrete nouns, it is to be described as a grammaticalized feature.
References (31)
References
Abeillé, A. & Rambow, O. (eds). 2000. Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalisms, Linguistic Analysis and Processing. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ajdukiewicz, K. 1935. Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica I: 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apresjan, J.D., Boguslavskij, I.M., Iomdin, L.I. & Sannikov, V.Z. 2010. Teoretcheskije problemy russkogo sintaksisa. Vzaimodejstvije grammatiki i slovarja. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskich kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, J. 1965. Souvětí s větami obsahovými, Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university. A 13: 55–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, R.A. Jacobs & P.S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, S.J. 2010. The Chain of Being and Having in Slavic [Studies in Language Companion Series 122]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G.G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneš, F. 1968. Dostal jsem přidáno a podobné pasivní konstrukce. Naše řeč, 51: 269–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Věta a text. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giger, M. 2003. Resultativa Im Modernen Tschechischen. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hajič, J., Panevová, J., Urešová, Z., Bémová, A., Kolářová, V. & Pajas, P. 2003. PDT-VALLEX: Creating a large-coverage valency lexicon for Treebank annotation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories , 57–68. Vaxjo: Vaxjo University Press.
Hajič, J., Panevová, J., Hajičová, E., Sgall, P., Pajas, P., Štěpánek, J., Havelka, J., Mikulová, M., Žabokrtský, Z. & Ševčíková Razímová, M. 2006. Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kettnerová, V. 2008. Czech verbs of communication with respect to the types of dependent content clauses. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 90: 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopatková, M., Žabokrtský, A. & Kettnerová, V. 2008. Valenční slovník českých sloves. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopatková, M. 2010. Valency Lexicon of Czech Verbs: Towards Formal Description of Valency and Its Modeling in an Electronic Language Resource. Habilitation thesis, Charles University, Prague.
Mathesius, V. 1925. Slovesné časy typu perfektního v hovorové češtině. Naše řeč, 9: 200–202.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.A. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Explanatory combinatorial dictionary. In Open Problems in Linguistics and Lexicography, G. Sica (ed.), 225–355. Monza: Polimetrica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikulová, M., Bémová, A., Hajič, J., Hajičová, E., Havelka, J., Kolářová, V., Kučová, L., Lopatková, M., Pajas, P., Panevová, J., Razímová, M., Sgall, P., Štěpánek, J., Urešová, Z., Veselá, K. & Žabokrtský, Z. 2006. Annotation on the Tectogrammatical Level in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Annotation Manual [Technical Report 2006/30]. Prague: Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Načeva Marvanová, M. 2010. Perfektum v současné češtině. Praha: NLN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panevová, J. 1974. On verbal frames in functional generative description I. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 22: 3–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. On verbal frames in functional generative description II. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 23: 17–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Valency frames and the meaning of the sentence. In The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics [Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe 41], P.L. Luelsdorff (ed.), 223–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. O rezultativnosti (především) v češtině. In Zbornik Matice srpske: Gramatika i leksika u slovenskim jezicima, 165–176. Novi Sad: Matica sprska.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panevová, J. & Ševčíková, M. 2010. Annotation of morphological meanings of verbs revisited. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , 1491–1498. Paris: ELRA.
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E. & Panevová, J. 1986. The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Praha & Dordrecht: Academia & Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sgall, P. 1967. Generativní popis jazyka a česká deklinace. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Teorie valence a její formální zpracování. Slovo a slovesnost 59: 15–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svozilová, N., Prouzová, H. & Jirsová, A. 1997. Slovesa pro praxi. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urešová, Z. 2011. Valenční slovník Pražského zavislostního korpus. PDT-Vallex. Praha: Ústav formalní a aplikované lingvistiky.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue