Cover not available

In:Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214] 2014
► pp. 253282

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (37)
References
Adger, David. 2007. Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4): 238–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2 ], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 1999. On focus vs. wh-movement: The case of Caribbean Spanish. Sophia Linguistica 44–45: 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2006. In situ focus in Caribbean Spanish: Towards a unified account of focus. In Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium , 13–23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56(1): 29–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2(4): 303–351.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik , Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The syntax of time arguments. Lingua 117(2): 330–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel, Meinunger, André & Wilder, Chris. 2000. Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 54(1): 41–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 1994. Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus [Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 “Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik” 51]. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 2009. On the nature of covert operations: the case of focus in Spanish pseudo-clefts. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 87–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1997. Questions. In Handbook of Logic and Language , Jan van Benthem & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 1055–1124. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James & May, Robert. 1981. Questions, quantifiers and crossing. The Linguistic Review 1(1): 41–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, Roger. 1976. The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English . Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2009. The Syntax of Sentential Stress . Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 2007. Topic and Focus: Two structural positions associated with logical functions in the left-periphery of the Hungarian sentence. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6 [Working Papers of SFB 632], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 69–81. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71(4): 669–695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book , Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1991. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik [Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte 4], Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In The Architecture of Focus , Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Méndez-Vallejo, Catalina. 2009. Focalizing SER (‘TO BE’) in Colombian Spanish. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molnár, Valéria & Winkler, Susanne. 2010. Edges and gaps: contrast at the interfaces. Lingua 120(6): 1392–1415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the Left Periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook of Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1972. Act. In Semantics of Natural Language , Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 10–126. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 1998. Pseudocleft connectivity and the structure of noun phrases. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Clausal equations (a note on the connectivity problem). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(1):157–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect . Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1993. The syntax of tense. Ms, UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 1990. Times as temporal argument structure. Paper presented at the conference “Time in Language”. Cambridge MA: MIT.
. 1995. Temporal argument structure: configurational elements of construal. In Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality . Vol. 1: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives , Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentino Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds), 397–410. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Tense, aspect and modality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax , Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 746–792. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Heidinger, Steffen
2022. Corpus Data and the Position of Information Focus in Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Vercauteren, Aleksandra
2018. European Portuguese focalizing SER ‘to be’. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13],  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue