In:Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214] 2014
► pp. 253–282
Chapter 9. On the grammaticalization of the Assertion Structure
A view from Spanish
Published online: 31 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.214.14zub
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.214.14zub
This paper argues that the standard and colloquial variety of Spanish pseudo-clefts provide support for the bi-clausal analysis of such constructions (Ross 1972, Schlenker 1998, 2003, den Dikken et al. 2000), and this transparently encodes the Assertion Structure of the sentence: the pre-copular clause encodes the presupposition and the post-copular clause the assertion, with the focused phrase contained within the latter. It is furthermore argued that the Caribbean Spanish bare-copular construction, in particular the Andean variety of the Bucaramanga dialect of Colombia (Méndez-Vallejo 2009), constitutes a more advanced stage of the bi-clausal grammaticalization of the Assertion Structure, with a reduced bi-clausal structure. Finally, it is suggested that standard Spanish monoclausal sentences with a sentence final focus in a non-canonical word order can be given an analysis that involves a variant of the reduced bi-clausal structure proposed for the Caribbean Spanish bare-copular construction.
References (37)
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In
The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2
], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.
Bosque, Ignacio. 1999. On focus vs. wh-movement: The case of Caribbean Spanish.
Sophia Linguistica
44–45: 1–32.
Camacho, José. 2006.
In situ focus in Caribbean Spanish: Towards a unified account of focus. In
Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium
, 13–23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization.
Studia Linguistica
56(1): 29–57.
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In
Ken Hale: A Life in Language
, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In
Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik
, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
den Dikken, Marcel, Meinunger, André & Wilder, Chris. 2000. Pseudoclefts and ellipsis.
Studia Linguistica
54(1): 41–89.
Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 1994.
Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus
[Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340 “Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik” 51]. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.
Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 2009. On the nature of covert operations: the case of focus in Spanish pseudo-clefts. In
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 87–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1997. Questions. In
Handbook of Logic and Language
, Jan van Benthem & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 1055–1124. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Higginbotham, James & May, Robert. 1981. Questions, quantifiers and crossing.
The Linguistic Review
1(1): 41–79.
Higgins, Roger. 1976.
The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English
. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Kiss, Katalin É. 2007. Topic and Focus: Two structural positions associated with logical functions in the left-periphery of the Hungarian sentence. In
Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6 [Working Papers of SFB 632], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 69–81. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In
The Generic Book
, Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
Krifka, Manfred. 1991. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In
Informationsstruktur und Grammatik
[Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte 4], Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In
The Architecture of Focus
, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Méndez-Vallejo, Catalina. 2009. Focalizing SER (‘TO BE’) in Colombian Spanish. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Molnár, Valéria & Winkler, Susanne. 2010. Edges and gaps: contrast at the interfaces.
Lingua
120(6): 1392–1415.
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the Left Periphery. In
Elements of Grammar. Handbook of Generative Syntax
, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Ross, John. 1972. Act. In
Semantics of Natural Language
, Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 10–126. Dordrecht: Reidel.
. 2003. Clausal equations (a note on the connectivity problem).
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
21(1):157–214.
Zagona, Karen. 1990. Times as temporal argument structure. Paper presented at the conference “Time in Language”. Cambridge MA: MIT.
. 1995. Temporal argument structure: configurational elements of construal. In
Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality
. Vol. 1:
Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives
, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentino Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds), 397–410. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Heidinger, Steffen
Vercauteren, Aleksandra
2018. European Portuguese focalizing SER ‘to be’. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13], ► pp. 297 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
