Cover not available

In:Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Kristin Bech and Kristine Gunn Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213] 2014
► pp. 341–376

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

On the interaction between syntax, prosody and information structure

An interface approach to word order developments in Germanic

 | University of Ca’Foscari, Venice
Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.13hin
In this paper, I argue that the distinction between OV and VO word orders should not be accounted for by a distinction in the base. More specifically, I argue that this distinction can be reduced to the workings of two parallel interface conditions that define the optimal mapping from syntax to PF and from syntax to LF, respectively. I discuss how mixed OV/VO orders in Old High German and Old English can be accounted for in this framework and then lay out the historical conditions and the possible grammatical factors that made English develop into a PF-transparent VO language and German into a scope-transparent OV language.
References (54)
References:
Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The Syntax of Interpretation [HIL Dissertation 14].The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax , Band 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bies, Ann. 1996. Syntax and Discourse Factors in Early New High German. Evidence for Verb-final Word Order. MA thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Wurmbrand, Susi. 2012. Word order and scope: Transparent interfaces and the 3/4 signature. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 371–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Bare phrase structure. In Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program , Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 383–439. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. On phases. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Crosslinguistic Perspective . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 20]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 369–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax . New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escribano, José Luis González. 2009. Head-Final Effects and the Nature of Modification. PhD dissertation, Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication . Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2000. Adverb placement – Convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The Syntax of German . Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1987. An Essay on Stress . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2002. Parametric variation and scrambling in English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 131–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Scrambling, Remnant Movement and Restructuring . Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. A phase-based comparative approach to modification and word order in Germanic. Syntax 12(3): 242–284.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Information structure and basic word order in older Germanic. In Information Structure from Different Perspectives , Caroline Féry & Malte Zimmermann (eds), 282–304. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. How prosody restricts syntax. In Festschrift for Annarita Puglielli , Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 81–100. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear a. An interface account of word order variation in OHG. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds), Proceedings of DIGS 12. Oxford: OUP.
. To appear b. Economy conditions and coreference: From minimal pronouns to referential acts. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 91 (2013).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2001. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO [Linguistik Akuell/Linguistics Today 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1984. Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik. Linguistische Berichte 91: 25–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book , Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 123–175. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1984. Fokus, Topik, syntaktische Struktur und semantische Interpretation. Ms, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Verb–object order in Early Middle English. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms , Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 132–163. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert. 1986. Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology 3: 311–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Intonational Phonology . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic Words. PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal Movement and its Kin . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana & Speyer, Augustin. 2011. Focus movement and focus interpretation in Old English. In Focus Marking Strategies and Focus Interpretation, of Lingua 121(11), Edgar Onea & Malte Zimmermann (eds), 1751–1765.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase Structures in Competition. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 289–330. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 1997. Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change , Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 397–426. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Uhlirova, Ludmila. 1998. An overview of word order in Slavic languages. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe , Anna Siewierska (ed.), 105–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlachter, Eva. 2010. Zur Entwicklung des rechten Satzrandes (AHD > MHD). 12. Interner Workshop des SFB 632, 22–23 April 2010, Reckhan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. Sentence prosody: intonation, stress and phrasing. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory , John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. l. Yu (eds), 550–569. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan 2008. The effect of information structure on object position in the history of English. Talk given at ICEHL 15, Munich 24 – 30 August 2008.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 2001. Verb movement Variation in Germanic and Optimality Theory. Habilitation thesis, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Asymmetries in prosodic domain formation. In Perspectives on Phases , N. Richards & M. McGinnis (eds), 329–367. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1): 160–163.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

De Bastiani, Chiara
2022. The reanalysis of VO in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Magistro, Giuseppe, Claudia Crocco & Anne Breitbarth
2022. Information structure and Jespersen’s cycle. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
De Bastiani, Chiara & Roland Hinterhölzl
2020. On the syntax of object pronouns in Old English and Early Middle English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2017. Chapter 2. From OV to VO in English. In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 243], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Leuschner, Torsten
2016. Fictive questions in conditionals?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue