In:Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Kristin Bech and Kristine Gunn Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213] 2014
► pp. 295–312
Subjects and objects in Germanic and Romance
Published online: 7 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.11faa
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.11faa
The syntactic functions of subject and object are usually characterized by a certain semantic role and/or discourse function (information structure). In a “free word order” language, the position of a phrase at main clause level tends to be determined by its discourse function, while retaining its prototypical semantic role. In this paper we show that in the earlier stages of Germanic (represented by Norwegian) and of Romance (Spanish), the syntactic functions of subject and object were largely characterized by their semantic role, rather than by information structure. These languages then underwent a change, whereby the discourse-functional properties of subjects and objects became more prominent, allowing subjects to express various semantic roles.
References (34)
DN:
Diplomatarium Norvegicum
Eg: Jónsson, F. (ed)
Egils saga Skalla-Grímssonar
. København 1886–8.
Hkr: Jónsson, F. (ed)
Heimskringla
: Noregs konunga s?gur af Snorri Sturluson I-IV. København 1893–1901.
Davies, Mark. 2002.
Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s-1900s
. [URL]
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Psycholinguistic perspectives on language change. In
The Handbook of Historical Linguistics
, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 736–743. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986.
Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use
. New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing.
Comrie, Bernard. 1989.
Language Universals and Linguistic Typology
. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique subjects: a common Germanic inheritance.
Language
81: 824–881.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990.
Syntactic Change. Towards a Theory of Historical Syntax
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 1995. Diachrony, typology, and universal grammar: from “Classical” European to Modern Western European. In
Papers from the 31st Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society
, Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need & Sheri Parman (eds.), 153–170. Chicago IL: CLS.
. 2000. Reanalysis in word order stability and change. In
Stability, Variation and Change of Word-order Patterns over Time
[Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 87], Rosanna Sornicola, Erich Poppe & Ariel Shisha-Halevy (eds), 119–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2001. The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. In
Grammatical Relations in Change
[Studies in Language Companion Series 56], JanTerje Faarlund (ed.), 99–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
. 2008. A mentalist interpretation of grammaticalization theory. In
Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113], Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed), 221–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. The pro cycle. In
Argument Structure in Flux
[Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds), 257–284.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fontana, Josep M. 1993. Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language
56: 251–299.
Janda, Richard D. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization.
Language Sciences
23(2–3): 265–340.
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In
Subject and Topic,
Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York NY: Academic Press.
Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid. 1996. Reflexiones acerca de una descripción funcional de la posición del sujeto en el español medieval.
Actas del III Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española
1, 471–488. Madrid: Arcos libros.
Öhl, Peter. 2010. Formal and functional constraints on constituent order and their universality. In
Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 165], Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds), 231–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
