Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (25)
References
Arnold, Jennifer E., Losongco, Anthony, Wasow, Thomas & Ginstrom, Ryan. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1): 28–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2008. Cascading parameter changes. Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory. The Rosendal Papers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113], Þórhallur Eyþórsson (ed.), 79–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bies, Ann Elizabeth. 1996. Syntax and Discourse Factors in Early New High German: Evidence for Verb-Final Word Order. MA dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 2006. Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calhoun, Sasha, Nissim, Malvina, Steedman, Mark & Brenier, Jason. 2005. A framework for annotating information structure in discourse. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky , 45–52. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production , Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haug, Dag T.T. 2011. Guidelines for annotation of givenness: The PROIEL project. [URL]
Haviland, Susan E. & Clark, Herbert H. 1974. What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 512–521. [URL]
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In Syntax and Semantics 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground , James D. McCawley (ed.), 363–385. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Komen, Erwin R. 2012. The Pentaset: Annotating information state primitives. Ms, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nissim, Malvina, Dingare, Shipra, Carletta, Jean & Steedman, Mark. 2004. An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) , 1023–1026, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1996. Cliticization in Old English. In Approaching Second. Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena , Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 366–400. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition. Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2006. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics , Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Discourse Description. Diverse Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra A. Thompson & WilliamC. Mann (eds), 195–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riester, Arndt, Lorenz, David & Seemann, Nina. 2010. A recursive annotation scheme for referential information status. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) , 717–722, Valetta, Malta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2011. The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 71–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change, María José López Couso, Bettelou Los & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds), 71–94. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight and information structure. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 835–845. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & van der Wurff, Wim (eds). 2005. Special issue on aspects of OV and VO order in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C. 2009. Antisymmetry and the Conservation of C-Command: Scrambling and Phrase Structure in Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1997. Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9: 81–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

LOS, BETTELOU, GEA DRESCHLER, ANS VAN KEMENADE, ERWIN KOMEN & STEFANO CORETTA
2023. The decline of local anchoring: a quantitative investigation. English Language and Linguistics 27:2  pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
STRUIK, TARA & GERT-JAN SCHOENMAKERS
2023. When information structure exploits syntax: The relation between the loss of VO and scrambling in Dutch. Journal of Linguistics 59:3  pp. 655 ff. DOI logo
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade
2022. Information structure and OV word order in Old and Middle English: a phase-based approach. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 25:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Tiemann, Juliane
2022. The object position in Old Norwegian. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275],  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Chrambach, Susanne
2019. From time-before-place to place-before-time in the history of English. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346],  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2018. Split coordination in English. Diachronica 35:3  pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2020. Split coordination in English. In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113],  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Dreschler, Gea
2017. Chapter 6. The information status of late subjects in passive main clauses in Old English. In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 243],  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue