Cover not available

In:Adjectives in Germanic and Romance
Edited by Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde and Harry Perridon
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 212] 2014
► pp. 245–262

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Adjectives in German and Norwegian

Differences in weak and strong inflections

 | University of North Texas
 | Lund University
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.212.10roe
In this paper, we demonstrate that adjective endings in the Germanic languages do not pattern uniformly. We illustrate this with nine syntactic contexts: possessives involving proper names and pronominals, embedded and unembedded proper names, “disagreeing” pronominal DPs, appositives, definite adjectives, vocatives, and discontinuous noun phrases. We show that German is subject to lexical and structural conditions but Scandinavian is semantic in nature. In German, the weak endings are feature-reduced forms, which always have a specific local relation to a certain type of determiner, which triggers the relevant feature reduction. Adopting Distributed Morphology, this reduction in features is implemented by Impoverishment. In Scandinavian, the weak endings are an agreement reflex of a semantic feature. We follow others in that adjectives are in – what is traditionally called – Spec,AgrP. We propose that the relevant semantic feature is on Agr and the adjective agrees with it. Given the language-specific conditions, the strong endings surface in the remaining contexts in both types of languages as the elsewhere case.
References (29)
References
Blevins, James P. 1995. Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(2): 113–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2): 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 2008. Uniformity and diversity in the syntax of evaluative vocatives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(1): 43–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages: A Comparative Study. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1998. Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik, Band 1: Das Wort. Stuttgart: Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa. 2011. On the structure of vocatives. Ms, Free University of Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1870. Deutsche Grammatik, Vol 1, 2nd edn.. Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 275–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne. 1989. Case attraction and the hierarchization of case. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 6: 138–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2008. The Internal Syntax of Determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohrmann, Susanne. 2011. A unified structure for Scandinavian DPs. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, Variation, and Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171], Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds), 111–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2002. Remarks on nominal inflection in German. In More than Words. A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds), 113–145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1989. Movement and regeneration. In Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Paola Benincà (ed.), 105–136. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 287–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and Definite Articles as Nominal Auxiliaries [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 140]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Semantically vacuous elements: Adjectival inflections and the article ein in German. Ms, University of North Texas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The inner make-up of definite determiners: The case of Germanic. Ms, University of North Texas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 1996. The late insertion of Germanic inflection. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaden, Gerhard. 2010. Vocatives: A note on addressee-management. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(1): 176–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 1999. La flexion de l’adjectif en allemand: La morphologie de haut en bas. In Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 28: 115–132. <[URL]> Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2009. Agreement, Dominance and Doubling: The Morphosyntax of DP. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Definiteness marking in Germanic: Morphological variations on the same syntactic theme. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15(2): 107–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Donald. 2001. The Great Gender Shift and the attrition of neuter nouns in West Germanic: The example of German. In New Insights in Germanic II, Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds.), 201–224. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2008. Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, Vol I. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1999. The Identification of Functional Architecture. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

van Baal, Yvonne
2024. (Den) eneste måten – When the Prenominal Determiner Can Be Omitted from Norwegian Double Definite Phrases. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 36:2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Julien, Marit & Dorian Roehrs
2023. Phrasal Proper Names in German and Norwegian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 26:1 DOI logo
Pfaff, Alexander
2023. The Prehistory of Weak Adjectival Phrases in Old Norse. In Internal and External Causes of Language Change, ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Sahel, Said
2022. Entwicklung und Durchsetzung der Monoflexion im 18. Jahrhundert. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 144:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Julien, Marit
2016. Possessive predicational vocatives in Scandinavian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Poletto, Cecilia
2016. Which clues for which V2. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 234], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Roehrs, Dorian
2015. Inflections on pre-nominal adjectives in Germanic: Main types, subtypes, and subset relations. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18:3 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Roehrs, Dorian
2019. Three Typological Differences Between the North and the West Germanic DPs. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. Quantifying Expressions in the History of German [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 230], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue