Cover not available

In:Adjectives in Germanic and Romance
Edited by Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde and Harry Perridon
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 212] 2014
► pp. 113–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The resilient nature of adjectival inflection in Dutch

 | Research Foundation Flanders FWO | University of Leuven
 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.212.05vel
The rich Germanic adjectival inflection dramatically eroded in the history of Dutch as part of a general process of deflection. At present, Dutch is left with what appears to be a vestigial structure: an alternation between an inflected form in schwa and an uninflected form, the distribution of which is semantically ill-motivated. As a consequence, one might expect that the inflection is moribund and that Dutch will follow its West Germanic neighbor English in doing away with this dysfunctional piece of morphology. This is not what is happening, though. Dutch adjectival inflection is remarkably resilient. In this article it is argued that this resilience is due to refunctionalization. The inflectional schwa is turning into a transparent marker of attributive adjectives, and comes to function as a watershed between the modification and determination zone in the noun phrase. This account explains many erratic inflectional patterns in non-standard language. The whole reanalysis is a long-term process, which has not yet come to completion, but the existence of the process is supported by a detailed investigation of corpus data.
References (76)
References
Berteloot, Amand. 2005. “… eens wisen subtiils menschen …” Over de verbuiging van het adjectief in het Middelnederlands. In Gehugdic Sis Samnungun Thinro. Liber amicorum Willy Pijnenburg, Aad Quak & Tannke Schoonheim (eds), 23–37. Groningen: Gopher Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, Alied. 1994. Het ondoorgrondelijk bijvoeglijk naamwoord. Forum der Letteren 55: 81–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, Elma, Polišenská, Daniela & Weerman, Fred. 2006. Effects of age on the acquisition of agreement inflection. Morphology 16: 313–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Articles, adjectives and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research 24: 297–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boumans, Louis. 2002. Meertaligheid op de Marokkaanse elektronische prikborden. Levende Talen 3: 11–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 2008. Observations on the origins of definiteness in ancient Germanic. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 351–371.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Keizer, Evelien. 2012. Syntax of Dutch, Vol. I: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coene, Martine & Yves D’hulst. 2003. Introduction: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. In From DP to NP, Vol I: The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 56], Martine Coene & Yves D’hulst (eds), 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Schutter, Georges. 1998. The noun phrase in Dutch. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 86: 309–356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Het achterveld in de nominale constituent in het Nederlands. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 88: 323–354.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88(3): 601–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diepeveen, Janneke & Van de Velde, Freek. 2010. Adverbial morphology: How Dutch and German are moving away from English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22: 381–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Noun phrase structure. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed.), 151–205. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duinhoven, Anton M. 1988. Middelnederlandse Syntaxis, Synchroon en Diachroon, Deel 1: De Naamwoordgroep. Leiden: Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fudeman, Kirsten. 2004. Adjectival agreement vs. adverbal inflection in Balanta. Lingua 114: 105–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek. 2011. A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, intensification and (inter)subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 22(4): 765–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1998. Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 227–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Deygers, Katrien, Van Aken, Hilde, van den Heede, Vicky & Speelman, Dirk. 2000. Het CONDIV-corpus geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5(4): 356–363.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, de Rooij, Jaap & van den Toorn, Maarten C. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, nd edn. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. The behaviour-before-coding principle in syntactic change. In Mélanges Denis Creissels, Franck Floricic (ed.), 493–506. Paris: Presses de L’École Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. On degrammaticalization. In Historical Linguistics 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237], Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds), 163–179, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds). 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 1992. Diachronic explanation: Putting the speaker back into the picture. In Explanations in Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 84], Garry W. Davis & Gregory K. Iverson (eds), 123–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2004. How much of the Germanic strong adjective inflection is pronominal? <[URL]>
Narrog, Heiko. 2007. Exaptation, grammaticalization, and reanalysis. California Linguistic Notes 32(1). <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2002. The final stages of grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 45–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Old Dutch dictionary. <[URL]>
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 423–523. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plevoets, Koen, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2009. De verspreiding van de -e(n)-uitgang in attributieve positie. Taal en Tongval Thematic issue 22: 112–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polišenská, Daniela. 2010. Dutch Children’s Acquisition of Verbal and Adjectival Inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quak, Aad & van der Horst, Joop. 2002. Inleiding Oudnederlands. Leuven:Leuven University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, Charles L. 1969 [1955]. An Old English Grammar. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raidt, Edith H. 1968. Geskiedenis van die Byvoeglike Verbuiging in Nederlands en Afrikaans. Kaapstad: Nasou Beperk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ranheimsæter, Harald. 1945. Flektierte und unflektierte Nominativformen im Deutschen Adjektivsystem. Oslo: J.G. Tanum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royen, Gerlach. 1948. Buigingsverschijnselen in het Nederlands, Vol 2. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1953. Buigingsverschijnselen in het Nederlands, Vol. 3(2). Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruette, Tom & Van de Velde, Freek. Forthcoming. Moroccorp: Tien miljoen woorden uit twee Marokkaans-Nederlandse chatkanalen. Lexikos.
Scott, Gary-John. 2002. Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. In Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 91–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Horst. 2010. “Exaptation” in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung. In Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 41–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, John-Charles. 2006. How to do things without junk: the refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance. In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics, Vol. II: Phonetics, Phonology and Dialectology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 276], Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (ed.), 183–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Change and continuity in form-function relationships. In The Cambridge History of the Romance languages, Martin Maiden, John-Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 268–317. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk. 1997. Abundantia Verborum. A Corpus-tool for Carrying out Corpus Based Linguistic Case Studies. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066, Richard M. Hogg (ed.), 168–289. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In The Handbook of Language Contact, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 299–319. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, Gorden H. 1998. The Lexicogrammar of Adjectives: A Systemic Functional Approach to Lexis. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tummers, José. 2005. Het Naakt(e) Adjectief: Een Kwantitatief-empirisch Onderzoek naar de Buigingsvariatie bij Neutra in het Nederlands. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
é, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2004. Quantifying semantic effects. The impact of lexical collocations on the inflectional variation of Dutch attributive adjectives. In Le poids des mots, Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds), 1079–1088. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
é, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2005. Inflectional variation in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch: A usage-based account of the adjectival inflection. In Perspectives on Variation. Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds), 93–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bree, Cor. 1987. Historische Grammatica van het Nederlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Lubbe, Henricus F.A. 1958. Woordvolgorde in het Nederlands: Een Synchrone Structurele Beschouwing. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2006. Herhaalde exaptatie. Een diachrone analyse van de Germaanse adjectiefflexie. In Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels, Matthias Hüning, Arie Verhagen, Ulrike Vogl & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 47–69. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. De Nominale Constituent. Structuur en Geschiedenis. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48(2): 263–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Anaphoric adjectives becoming determiners. A corpus-based account. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, Variation, and Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171], Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds), 241–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & van der Horst, Joop. 2013. Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences 36: 66–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Johannes A. 1862. De verbuiging van enkele telwoorden. De Taalgids 4: 65–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leuvenste?n, Arjan & Dekker, M.C.H. 1990. Adnominale flexie en genusmarkering in 16de-eeuws Brugs. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 79: 257–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Loon, Jozef. 1988. Zwakke, sterke en pronominale adjectiefflexie in het Oudnederlands. Naamkunde 20: 37–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Marle, Jaap. 1995. On the fate of adjectival declension in overseas Dutch (with some notes on the history of Dutch). In Historical Linguistics 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Hennig Andersen (ed.), 283–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Roey, Jacques. 1974. A Contrastive Description of English and Dutch Noun Phrases. Brussel: AIMAV.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. Exaptation and grammaticalization. In Historical Linguistics 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Hennig Andersen (ed.), 433–445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 2003. Een mooie verhaal. Veranderingen in uitgangen. In Waar gaat het Nederlands naartoe? Panorama van een Taal, Jan Stroop (ed.), 249–260. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Adverbia als adjectiva. In A.D. 2005. Taalkundige Artikelen voor Ad Welschen, Els Elffers & Fred Weerman (eds). Amsterdam: Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. It’s the economy, stupid! Een vergelijkende blik op men en man. In Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels, Matthias Hüning, Arie Verhagen, Ulrike Vogl & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred, Bisschop, Jannetje & Punt, Laura. 2006. L1 and L2 acquisition of Dutch adjectival inflexion. ACLC Working Papers 1: 5–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, David 2010. Degrammaticalization and obsolescent morphology: evidence from Slavonic. In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119], Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds), 151–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik. In Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 29–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WNT: Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. 2003. ’s-Gravenhage: Sdu. Cd-rom version of: Matthias de Vries & Lammert te Winkel (1882–1998). Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. ’s-Gravenhage: Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziemann, Hendrikje, Fred Weerman & Esther Ruigendijk. 2011. Nederlands later geleerd: Gebruik van lidwoorden en flexie van bijvoeglijke naamwoorden door Duitstalige kinderen en volwassenen. Internationale Neerlandistiek 49(3): 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Appendix: Corpora
TwNC: Twente News Corpus, see: <[URL]>
CONDIV: see Grondelaers et al. (2000).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MOROCCORP: see Ruette & Van de Velde (Forthcoming).
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Lipták, Anikó & Rint Sybesma
2024. Missing and not found. Linguistic Variation 24:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Roehrs, Dorian
2019. Three Typological Differences Between the North and the West Germanic DPs. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2018. Baseline elaboration and echo-sounding at the adjective adverb interface. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
2016. Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van de Velde
2016. Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? . Folia Linguistica 50:2 ► pp. 543 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek & Muriel Norde
2016. Exaptation. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue