In:Cross-linguistic Investigations of Nominalization Patterns
Edited by Ileana Paul
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 210] 2014
► pp. 3–24
Nominalizations in Ojibwe
Published online: 18 February 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.210.01mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.210.01mat
The aim of this paper is to account for nominalization processes in Ojibwe including agent and non-agent nominalizations. I make two main claims: (1) in Ojibwe (even) simple nouns (result nominals, cf. Grimshaw 1990) have internal (verbal) structure; (2) agent nominals in Ojibwe are not exactly nominalizations: they are more like full clauses (with no nominal projection on top of the CP). Theoretically, I address for Ojibwe the puzzle mentioned by Harley (2009) for English nominalizations: meaning shifts from event to result readings do not affect the internal morphological structure of the nominalization. In Ojibwe, it will be argued that, although many nominalizations have transitive morphology, the transitive verb that is imported into the nominalization process is devoid of an internal and of an external argument, creating result nominalization rather than event nominalization.
References (35)
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalizations and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: The case of (Greek) deverbal nominals. In Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou & Monica Rathert (eds), 253-280. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina, Iordachioaia & Soare, Elena. 2010. Syntactic realization of plural in Romance and Germanic nominalizations. In Romance Linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 313], Karlos Arregi, Zsuzsanna Fagyal, Silvina A. Montrul and Annie Tremblay (eds), 107-124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barrie, Michael & Mathieu, Eric. 2011. Head movement and noun incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 133-142.
Basic, Monika. 2010. On the morphological make-up of nominalizations in Serbian. In The Syntax of Nominalizations Across Languages and Frameworks, Artemis Alexiadou & Monica Rathert (eds), 39-66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blain, Eleanor Marie. 1997. Wh-Constructions in Nêhiyawêwin (Plains Cree). PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1957. Eastern Ojibwa: Grammatical Sketch, Texts and Word List. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations. In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds), 31-67. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Borsley, Robert & Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2000. Mixed extended projections. In The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories, Robert Borsley (ed.), 101-132. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Brittain, Julie. 2003. A Distributed Morphology account of the syntax of the Algonquian verb.
Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association
, [URL] (18 June 2013).
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184-221. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
. 1977. On wh movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akajian (eds), 71-132. New York NY: Academic Press.
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Fredin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133-166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger [Current Studies in Linguistics], Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53-109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalizations, Anastasia Giannakidou & Monica Rathert (eds), 321-343. Oxford: OUP.
Hirose, Tomio. 2002. Origins of Predicates: Evidence from Plains Cree. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Johns, Alana. 2008. Some issues concerning Algonquian WH questions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 29.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lochbihler, Bethany & Mathieu, Eric. 2008/2009. Wh-agreement in Ojibwe: Consequences for feature inheritance and the categorical status of tense. In
University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, Proceedings of WSCLA 13 & 14, Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas
, Heather Bliss & Raphael Girard (eds), 14-31. Vancouver BC: University of British Columbia.
. To appear. Héritage des traits morphologiques ϕ et δ en ojibwe.
Papers of the 40th Algonquian Conference
.
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201-225.
Mathieu, Eric. 2008. The syntax of abstract and concrete finals in Ojibwe. In
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 37)
, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 101-114. Charleston SC: BookSurge Publishing.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Richards, Marc. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 231-246.
Roberge, Yves. 2002. Transitivity requirement effects and the EPP. Paper presented at WECOL 2002
, Vancouver BC.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
